this actually overstates the case, because we all know the US military does a lot more than "killing our enemies." if NOTHING else, this overlooks a wide variety of humanitarian missions they undertake. but i digress:DarcSkies777;123855 said:Actually there's validity to it. The US Military is not in the business of weather reading. We already have Air Force meteorologist for that. The USMIlitary is in the business of killing our enemies. PERIOD.
...No matter what job there is in the military from desk jobs to on the ground jobs the end mission is to kill our enemies.
well, let's say this is the case: controlling the weather to benefit your military forces is a far cry from "we've developed a machine to shoot an earthquake at Haiti." and if you take HAARP at face value ("investigate the potential for developing ionospheric enhancement technology for communications and surveillance purposes"), it sounds like something with military use that has nothing to do with the conspiracy theories about it.DarcSkies777;123855 said:But controlling the weather is essential to winning battles and is also feasible scientifically
so saying there's validity to it should be followed up with a serious explanation of HOW HAARP is going to do the things they claim and/or, you know, proof of some kind. because it's still easier for guys like Chavez to make random comments about it than to address their actual problems.
that was evident. i'm curious as to how the Red Cross rises to the level of your expression.Chike;123868 said:Well that was mostly an expression meant to measure the level of wickedness we're dealing with when it comes to these so-called charities you see all over the place.
Last edited: