Official 2014 NBA Draft Thread (the race to the bottom)

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
They just had the same debate on PTI about Embid staying and getting better vs him leaving and it not mattering. Kornhieser was pro Embid leaving and Wilbon was for him staying a few years
 
Last edited:
MarcusGarvey;6762150 said:
Parker goes for 29pts


Had a dream last night that Jabari and Oladipo were the KD and Westbrook of the East. That shit felt too real smh woke up happy as hell. 4 more months till that shit is a reality.

 
af.r.i.c.a.;6764430 said:
MarcusGarvey;6762150 said:
Parker goes for 29pts


Had a dream last night that Jabari and Oladipo were the KD and Westbrook of the East. That shit felt too real smh woke up happy as hell. 4 more months till that shit is a reality.


Whispers are that Bari is staying one more year.
 
MarcusGarvey;6764830 said:
af.r.i.c.a.;6764430 said:
MarcusGarvey;6762150 said:
Parker goes for 29pts


Had a dream last night that Jabari and Oladipo were the KD and Westbrook of the East. That shit felt too real smh woke up happy as hell. 4 more months till that shit is a reality.


Whispers are that Bari is staying one more year.


I think Marcus Smarts situation is gonna change Embid and Parker's mind. I think Parker is more likely to declare because the Jazz are in prime position to draft him and that would be perfect for both sides.

 
Next years class has potential to be one of the GOATs for big men. Especially if Embid comes back.

Embid

Okafor

Alexander

Turner

Towns

Lee

Those are some quality Players

 
Jim (Milwaukee)

If Giannis had to drop out of the NBA right now and reenter the draft, where would be be on your big board?

Chad Ford (1:22 PM)

Something like 5 or 6. See Embiid, Wiggins, Parker and Exum ahead of him. That's about it. Maybe Randle.

John canada [via mobile]

Is this draft still as good in your opinion as it was before the season?

Chad Ford (1:32 PM)

No. But I say that every February. We've analyzed and over analyzed players and right now it's their weaknesses that are coming to the forefront. But we will hit March and a few of these guys will shine. And then we will get into workouts and teams will start talking themselves into players. But is this draft loaded with transcendent talent? Maybe, but it's no longer the sure thing we thought it would be in

Chad, are the sixers still leaning towards Wiggins over Parker?

Chad Ford (1:48 PM)

Yes. As are a lot of teams. Parker is a more polished offensive player, but Wiggins length, athletic ability and upside set him apart. NBA guys aren't really paying attention to the box scores. They are looking for the types of attributes that could make a player dominant at the next level. Wiggins has many. Even his biggest weakness (that he can be passive at times) has started to dissipate. He's been much more aggressive trying to create his own shot off the dribble. He's got to be a better finisher at the rim and continue to improve his three point shooting, but his upside is huge. Parker will also be a great NBA player and is better right now. But in 5 years, most teams are still betting on Wiggins. But remember we still have a few more months before the draft.

What have you seen from PJ Hairston in the d-league? Has his stock improved?

Chad Ford (1:53 PM)

He's played really well. He'll go somewhere in the second half of the first round. Lots of talent there. It's the off the court stuff he kept getting into at UNC that will limit his stock. If he had no off the court issues, he might be a pick in the 10-14 range.

Ben (UT) [via mobile]

Is there any truth to Noah Vonleh being preferred over Julius Randle rumors? Have GM's really soured on Randle's skill set?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

Some do. Vonleh is bigger and longer and has shown a more advanced perimeter game. But Randle is more of a beast in the paint offensively. Lately Vonleh has been the better rebounder. And he's younger. So yeah, there's an argument to made there. But right now we have Randle higher on the Big Board.

Paul (SC)

Did Smart make a mistake staying in school?

Chad Ford (1:38 PM)

No. Not at all. Because he went back for the right reasons. He knew he's be a Top 2 or 3 pick. He had the correct intel. He wanted to go back because he liked school, liked his teammates, wanted to help OSU win a title and he wanted to work on his game. Some of that hasn't worked out, but no one is a fortune teller. He went back for the right reasons and actually shows you the character of the young man. Basketball was more important to him than money. I think the media narrative about him right now couldn't be more off. Everyone makes mistakes. You have to look at the track record.
http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/50010/nba-insider-chad-ford

 
If Giannis was playing college ball right now I think he would be a top 5 pick. Kid is a beast and his ceiling is unlimited. He plays for the Bucks so he's under the radar if he played for a large market team different story. Still a young cub in the league but he has many things he needs to improve. His height will be problem for defenders if he can develop a consistent j.
 
Last edited:
one_manshow;6778475 said:
If Giannis was playing college ball right now I think he would be a top 5 pick. Kid is a beast and his ceiling is unlimited. He plays for the Bucks so he's under the radar if he played for a large market team different story. Still a young cub in the league but he has many things he needs to improve. His height will be problem for defenders if he can develop a consistent j.

I would take him 4th behind Wiggins/Parker/Embid. Bucks have some solid talent. I hope they ever get out of Milwaukee. Seattle makes the most sense

 
one_manshow;6778475 said:
If Giannis was playing college ball right now I think he would be a top 5 pick. Kid is a beast and his ceiling is unlimited. He plays for the Bucks so he's under the radar if he played for a large market team different story. Still a young cub in the league but he has many things he needs to improve. His height will be problem for defenders if he can develop a consistent j.

I'm glad Giannis is actually gettin' consistent minutes... Larry Drew is notorious for stuntin' the development of rookies by not playin' them. A trait he got from Mike Woodson.
 
af.r.i.c.a.;6777131 said:
Jim (Milwaukee)

If Giannis had to drop out of the NBA right now and reenter the draft, where would be be on your big board?

Chad Ford (1:22 PM)

Something like 5 or 6. See Embiid, Wiggins, Parker and Exum ahead of him. That's about it. Maybe Randle.

John canada [via mobile]

Is this draft still as good in your opinion as it was before the season?

Chad Ford (1:32 PM)

No. But I say that every February. We've analyzed and over analyzed players and right now it's their weaknesses that are coming to the forefront. But we will hit March and a few of these guys will shine. And then we will get into workouts and teams will start talking themselves into players. But is this draft loaded with transcendent talent? Maybe, but it's no longer the sure thing we thought it would be in

Chad, are the sixers still leaning towards Wiggins over Parker?

Chad Ford (1:48 PM)

Yes. As are a lot of teams. Parker is a more polished offensive player, but Wiggins length, athletic ability and upside set him apart. NBA guys aren't really paying attention to the box scores. They are looking for the types of attributes that could make a player dominant at the next level. Wiggins has many. Even his biggest weakness (that he can be passive at times) has started to dissipate. He's been much more aggressive trying to create his own shot off the dribble. He's got to be a better finisher at the rim and continue to improve his three point shooting, but his upside is huge. Parker will also be a great NBA player and is better right now. But in 5 years, most teams are still betting on Wiggins. But remember we still have a few more months before the draft.

What have you seen from PJ Hairston in the d-league? Has his stock improved?

Chad Ford (1:53 PM)

He's played really well. He'll go somewhere in the second half of the first round. Lots of talent there. It's the off the court stuff he kept getting into at UNC that will limit his stock. If he had no off the court issues, he might be a pick in the 10-14 range.

Ben (UT) [via mobile]

Is there any truth to Noah Vonleh being preferred over Julius Randle rumors? Have GM's really soured on Randle's skill set?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

Some do. Vonleh is bigger and longer and has shown a more advanced perimeter game. But Randle is more of a beast in the paint offensively. Lately Vonleh has been the better rebounder. And he's younger. So yeah, there's an argument to made there. But right now we have Randle higher on the Big Board.

Paul (SC)

Did Smart make a mistake staying in school?

Chad Ford (1:38 PM)

No. Not at all. Because he went back for the right reasons. He knew he's be a Top 2 or 3 pick. He had the correct intel. He wanted to go back because he liked school, liked his teammates, wanted to help OSU win a title and he wanted to work on his game. Some of that hasn't worked out, but no one is a fortune teller. He went back for the right reasons and actually shows you the character of the young man. Basketball was more important to him than money. I think the media narrative about him right now couldn't be more off. Everyone makes mistakes. You have to look at the track record.
http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/50010/nba-insider-chad-ford

Thanks for dropping this write up and sparking good debate on the young guys who might make the leap to the NBA
 
#1hiphopjunki3;6782220 said:
af.r.i.c.a.;6777131 said:
Jim (Milwaukee)

If Giannis had to drop out of the NBA right now and reenter the draft, where would be be on your big board?

Chad Ford (1:22 PM)

Something like 5 or 6. See Embiid, Wiggins, Parker and Exum ahead of him. That's about it. Maybe Randle.

John canada [via mobile]

Is this draft still as good in your opinion as it was before the season?

Chad Ford (1:32 PM)

No. But I say that every February. We've analyzed and over analyzed players and right now it's their weaknesses that are coming to the forefront. But we will hit March and a few of these guys will shine. And then we will get into workouts and teams will start talking themselves into players. But is this draft loaded with transcendent talent? Maybe, but it's no longer the sure thing we thought it would be in

Chad, are the sixers still leaning towards Wiggins over Parker?

Chad Ford (1:48 PM)

Yes. As are a lot of teams. Parker is a more polished offensive player, but Wiggins length, athletic ability and upside set him apart. NBA guys aren't really paying attention to the box scores. They are looking for the types of attributes that could make a player dominant at the next level. Wiggins has many. Even his biggest weakness (that he can be passive at times) has started to dissipate. He's been much more aggressive trying to create his own shot off the dribble. He's got to be a better finisher at the rim and continue to improve his three point shooting, but his upside is huge. Parker will also be a great NBA player and is better right now. But in 5 years, most teams are still betting on Wiggins. But remember we still have a few more months before the draft.

What have you seen from PJ Hairston in the d-league? Has his stock improved?

Chad Ford (1:53 PM)

He's played really well. He'll go somewhere in the second half of the first round. Lots of talent there. It's the off the court stuff he kept getting into at UNC that will limit his stock. If he had no off the court issues, he might be a pick in the 10-14 range.

Ben (UT) [via mobile]

Is there any truth to Noah Vonleh being preferred over Julius Randle rumors? Have GM's really soured on Randle's skill set?

Chad Ford (1:43 PM)

Some do. Vonleh is bigger and longer and has shown a more advanced perimeter game. But Randle is more of a beast in the paint offensively. Lately Vonleh has been the better rebounder. And he's younger. So yeah, there's an argument to made there. But right now we have Randle higher on the Big Board.

Paul (SC)

Did Smart make a mistake staying in school?

Chad Ford (1:38 PM)

No. Not at all. Because he went back for the right reasons. He knew he's be a Top 2 or 3 pick. He had the correct intel. He wanted to go back because he liked school, liked his teammates, wanted to help OSU win a title and he wanted to work on his game. Some of that hasn't worked out, but no one is a fortune teller. He went back for the right reasons and actually shows you the character of the young man. Basketball was more important to him than money. I think the media narrative about him right now couldn't be more off. Everyone makes mistakes. You have to look at the track record.
http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/50010/nba-insider-chad-ford

Thanks for dropping this write up and sparking good debate on the young guys who might make the leap to the NBA

No problem. I enjoy the debates in this thread. The NBA thread is watered down with niggas who don't know shit so this thread gives others a platform to talk real hoop

 
af.r.i.c.a.;6788383 said:
MarcusGarvey;6784425 said:
http://youtu.be/4-jc8Jae6ZE

Parker 6/16 FG, 2/6 3PT, 9/10 FT. 23pts 8reb

This kid is gonna be a star

One thing I notice is that he takes too many difficult shots at this stage of his career. At this point he's good enough to get high percentage shots
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
981
Views
840
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…