MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14
New member
its over: 2012!;3715748 said:No. Taking over a sport means that you are the main attraction, for the sake of this conversation. That was the exchange there, so don't come trying to fleece truths pal...lol...plus
The fact that the players can own, nothing, and still cost the owners this level of jurisprudence processes...at least, proves me right.
at slave auctions black slaves were the (2012 bold) main attraction (/2012bold) at horse races where slaves raced in the 1800's black horse racers were the (2012 bold) main attraction (/2012bold) and when white folk pay 3,000 to watch melo courtside at MSG black folk are the (2012 bold) main attraction (/2012bold).
The nba isn't on some soul train shit....there aint no black CEO's and black front offices or any type of diversity. And the fact they are playing the please the owners and white fans that pay to go to games in theory makes the nba players "house negros" if you think about it. Cause the house negro got to be inside from the shade and had a little better life and they got a little cockier than the average slave. The house negro would get "a slice of the pie" for their work while the feild negro would rather run away from the plantation to freedom and bake their own pies.
Last edited: