Nagging Moms: The Amazons in Justice League Edition

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Black_Samson;c-10098780 said:
CashmoneyDux;c-10098735 said:
lmao @ the "functional armor" argument

Nigga, they blowing up worlds with weapons and shit, fabric across their stomachs aint gon do shit

Well then by that logic, only superhero worth a damn is Namor the Submariner...

robdzy288tdu.jpg

Either you don't understand his point or you don't understand how logic works. lol
 
I mean, they don’t even look that feminine, so...

If anything the first one was more wrong cause it’s nothing but good looking women
 
Last edited:
Copper;c-10098884 said:
Functional armor for bitches that are a few hundred years old and can throw cars like a football?

Copper;c-10098884 said:
Functional armor for bitches that are a few hundred years old and can throw cars like a football?

Can we also point out that the "functional" armor that they had on in Wonder Woman didn't even protect them from WW1 weaponry?
 
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.
 
LUClEN;c-10099220 said:
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.

Don't you know, female choice only matters when they use that choice to do what feminists want. Ask the housewives who get bashed by feminists for choosing to do that.
 
LUClEN;c-10099220 said:
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.

Pretty sure that's not how movies work.
 
Kat;c-10099229 said:
LUClEN;c-10099220 said:
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.

Pretty sure that's not how movies work.

Right. But movies are also super oppositional to feminist thinking. If a director says "ay lead actress, you're gonna do a sex scene" she has no say in the matter. Which is exactly my point: if these critics really wanted to promote feminism, then they would be in favour of these women choosing what they wear, not trying to decide what they ought to wear.
 
LUClEN;c-10099288 said:
Kat;c-10099229 said:
LUClEN;c-10099220 said:
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.

Pretty sure that's not how movies work.

Right. But movies are also super oppositional to feminist thinking. If a director says "ay lead actress, you're gonna do a sex scene" she has no say in the matter. Which is exactly my point: if these critics really wanted to promote feminism, then they would be in favour of these women choosing what they wear, not trying to decide what they ought to wear.

A legitimate feminist position would be objecting to these women being FORCED into wearing that costume.

If one of the actresses said she didn't want to or felt pressured into it then they would have an argument but none of them said that.
 
jono;c-10099325 said:
LUClEN;c-10099288 said:
Kat;c-10099229 said:
LUClEN;c-10099220 said:
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.

Pretty sure that's not how movies work.

Right. But movies are also super oppositional to feminist thinking. If a director says "ay lead actress, you're gonna do a sex scene" she has no say in the matter. Which is exactly my point: if these critics really wanted to promote feminism, then they would be in favour of these women choosing what they wear, not trying to decide what they ought to wear.

A legitimate feminist position would be objecting to these women being FORCED into wearing that costume.

If one of the actresses said she didn't want to or felt pressured into it then they would have an argument but none of them said that.

jono;c-10099325 said:
LUClEN;c-10099288 said:
Kat;c-10099229 said:
LUClEN;c-10099220 said:
Wouldn't the most feminist thing be to let women choose wtf they want to wear? If the actress says she likes the one piece let her cook, and if she wants the two piece give her the two piece.

Pretty sure that's not how movies work.

Right. But movies are also super oppositional to feminist thinking. If a director says "ay lead actress, you're gonna do a sex scene" she has no say in the matter. Which is exactly my point: if these critics really wanted to promote feminism, then they would be in favour of these women choosing what they wear, not trying to decide what they ought to wear.

A legitimate feminist position would be objecting to these women being FORCED into wearing that costume.

If one of the actresses said she didn't want to or felt pressured into it then they would have an argument but none of them said that.

Of course not, same reason all these people are just now speaking up about the shit going on in Hollywood and DC..they scared to be blackballed.
 
Kat;c-10099506 said:
Copper;c-10099455 said:
Amazons in DC comics

67f1e102f187175b5fcb85eb52d911fd--dc-comics-girls-batman-dc-comics.jpg

DC artists have drawn many different depictions of the Amazonians though, you picked one of the raciest.

Thats not just any artist thats jim lee

Point im trying to make is ...are these pics sexist?

And if so whats sexist about it?

Women in the UFC wear less is that sexist?

I thought the slut walk was about not shaming women bodies so now were shaming actresses that work out and show thier bodies?
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
46
Views
3
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…