Miley Cyrus doesn't listen to hip hop anymore because it's "misogynistic"

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?
 
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

So do you think black women don't want to be on equal standing with black men?
 
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.
 
blackrain;c-9768142 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

So do you think black women don't want to be on equal standing with black men?

They already are on equal standing with black men. With the way the black family structure is today there is no family hierarchy anymore.
 
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?
 
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

Do you support democracy?
 
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

white feminist have their faults

but ultimately the tenants and policies championed by feminism such as gender equality, equal representation in government, higher minium wage, reporoductive rights, guaranteed sick/maternity leave, etc would help blk women the most and by extension their families

perpetuating this falsehood that feminism goes hand and hand with white supremacy ....or that misogyny, sexism is not something blk women have to or should have to concern themselves with is ridiculous

and only servers to preserve the power structure in this country

whether or not you believe the misogyny present in our community is of european influence, is besides the point. we don't live in a bubble and blk women same as other women still suffer under the weight of patriarchy here in this country and beyond
 
Undefeatable;c-9768170 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?

Black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda than the white feminist groups hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic.
 
Undefeatable;c-9768171 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

Do you support democracy?

Why?
 
5th Letter;c-9768193 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768170 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?

Black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda than the white feminist groups hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic.

If black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda, then why do you think that black feminists are "suspect," as you put it?
 
5th Letter;c-9768195 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768171 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

Do you support democracy?

Why?

I will explain why when you answer.
 
Undefeatable;c-9768203 said:
5th Letter;c-9768193 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768170 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?

Black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda than the white feminist groups hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic.

If black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda, then why do you think that black feminists are "suspect," as you put it?

"hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic"
 
Undefeatable;c-9768205 said:
5th Letter;c-9768195 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768171 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

Do you support democracy?

Why?

I will explain why when you answer.

Oh well.
 
5th Letter;c-9768209 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768203 said:
5th Letter;c-9768193 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768170 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?

Black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda than the white feminist groups hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic.

If black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda, then why do you think that black feminists are "suspect," as you put it?

"hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic"

That's not what you said. You said that any black woman that identifies as a feminist is "suspect" in your eyes.
 
fortyacres;c-9768119 said:
LUClEN;c-9768029 said:
fortyacres;c-9768001 said:
LUClEN;c-9767993 said:
blackrain;c-9767918 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

Most don't even know what they're railing against when they say they hate feminism. Anyone who can't believe that the mere concept of women wanting to be on equal social standing with men would have eventually began no matter what name you call it is being willfully ignorant.

Women were treated poorly all over the world. If what you're saying is true we would have seen feminism all over the world. Instead, it's mostly been in white countries.

It was and its well documented

Where was the feminism outside of the West?

You need to start read and research the following countries and people in the 17/18/19th centuries:

Egypt (read up on Huda Sha'arawi or Qasim Amin)

Iran (research Jam'iyat-e Nesvan-e Vatankhah)

Japan ( read up on Fusae Ichikawa)

China (He Zhen ,Yu Zhengxie and Yuan Mei.

India (read up on Savitribai Phule or Tarabai Shinde)

Africa (not a country obviously) women like Adelaide Casely-Hayford, the Sierra Leonian women’s rights activist referred, Charlotte Maxeke who in 1918 founded the Bantu Women’s League in South Africa.Ndate Yalla Mbodj, Nzinga , Nehanda etc.

its not hard dude all you gatta is library this shit or do your googles.Its obsurd to assume womens rights are solely exclusive to western ideology.

*absurd
 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9768187 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

white feminist have their faults

but ultimately the tenants and policies championed by feminism such as gender equality, equal representation in government, higher minium wage, reporoductive rights, guaranteed sick/maternity leave, etc would help blk women the most and by extension their families

perpetuating this falsehood that feminism goes hand and hand with white supremacy ....or that misogyny, sexism is not something blk women have to or should have to concern themselves with is ridiculous

and only servers to preserve the power structure in this country

whether or not you believe the misogyny present in our community is of european influence, is besides the point. we don't live in a bubble and blk women same as other women still suffer under the weight of patriarchy here in this country and beyond

Because modern feminism was started by women with white supremacists views? Word to them saying that the white woman (notice how she didn't say ALL women, but WHITE women) deserve the right to vote over black men and how white women were superior to black men. The very definition of white supremacy is believing that white people are superior to most other races. So my point stands.

 
Undefeatable;c-9768214 said:
5th Letter;c-9768209 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768203 said:
5th Letter;c-9768193 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768170 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?

Black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda than the white feminist groups hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic.

If black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda, then why do you think that black feminists are "suspect," as you put it?

"hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic"

That's not what you said. You said that any black woman that identifies as a feminist is "suspect" in your eyes.

White feminism
 
5th Letter;c-9768222 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768214 said:
5th Letter;c-9768209 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768203 said:
5th Letter;c-9768193 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768170 said:
5th Letter;c-9768156 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768141 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

Feminism is not an organization.

Let me ask you this. Do you support democracy?

There are feminist organizations so 9/10 times when someone says "I'm a feminist" it's understood that she may be apart of an organization or group of some kind.

I doubt most feminists are a part of any organization.

Anyway, there are different organizations. For example, there are all-black feminist organizations. Are such organizations working for the empowerment of white women only?

Black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda than the white feminist groups hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic.

If black feminist groups for the most part have a different agenda, then why do you think that black feminists are "suspect," as you put it?

"hence why I specifically said white feminist in most of my posts on this topic"

That's not what you said. You said that any black woman that identifies as a feminist is "suspect" in your eyes.

White feminism

Huh?

You said that any black woman that identifies as a white feminist is "suspect" in your eyes?

Black women do not usually identity as white feminists.

lol
 
Last edited:
5th Letter;c-9768158 said:
blackrain;c-9768142 said:
5th Letter;c-9768133 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768116 said:
5th Letter;c-9768083 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768057 said:
5th Letter;c-9768043 said:
Undefeatable;c-9768022 said:
5th Letter;c-9767922 said:
LUClEN;c-9767915 said:
playmaker88;c-9767541 said:
Whatever name you want to call.. a movement where women would want equality/equitable treatment, civl protections .. so on and so forth would have.. eventually have come to fruition..., Someone alluded to that point. it probably would have took on a different yet similar shape. So what are you really arguing bout.. the label?

You can't know that for sure. You're just speculating. A lot of the factors that spawned feminism were white specific. A lot of the issues feminism deals with are also white specific. So if the underlying context is different then obliviously whatever results will be different, assuming if and only if anything results at all. Not ever colony rebelled like Haiti despite facing similar conditions. So what makes you think feminism would have still developed?

Pretty much feminism was started because white women wanted a seat at the table. Then they recruited black women to help build their numbers and sold them on a lie of ALL women empowerment. Yet when stuff happens to black women at the hands of white men these feminist groups are quiet.

Can you answer this question: Are black women OK with being subordinated to men (unlike white women)?

You're making it sound like they have no interest in that, but are simply dupes of white women.

Men historically have always been the leaders of the household and there was always a power structure. Men unquestioned leaders, women 2nd in command then the children in order of age. Men were the breadwinner of the family so naturally there was some level of subordination of women to their men regardless of race.

The problem isn't women wanting equal rights. The problem is the fact that feminism was started because the white women wanted the same benefits that their white male counterparts received which said benefits were attained based on the subjugation of black people. So when you consider this why would ANY black woman support feminism? And when I say feminism I'm talking about identifying with it and being apart of these feminist groups.

Why would any black woman support feminism? Cause it is fundamentally about achieving equality for women.

There is so much confusion in your post. Even if the early feminists were racists, that does not mean that current feminists have to be racists as well. Nor does it mean that the character of feminism was fixed once and for all by what white feminists were arguing in 1900.

Feminism is about achieving the same benefits as their white male counterparts. To be on even footing with them. Do you think white women want to share these benefits with black women. Let me ask you a question since you are naive enough to believe their bullshit. If it's about "equality" then why do they rarely say anything when white males harm black women? They only seem to make a fuss when a black man harms a black woman.

We don't know if the current feminists are racists or not so therefore when you consider how/why that organization was formed any white woman claiming it is suspect in my eyes.

Feminism is not about achieving equality for white women only. You are assuming again that the goals of early white feminists must be the current goals of feminism.

They do speak out.

You really don't know what you are talking about. What about what I said yesterday about how there would be feminism (whether it was called that or something else) even if the whole world was just black?

Yes yes it is about gaining a seat next to their white male counterparts. If you joined an organization do you not do research into the history of said organization? Who started it and why? You think these white feminists don't know this? They only use black women for a numbers game and since black society is so fractured it's easy to pit black people against each other and even fight against their self interest. If they speak out then why were there little to no outrage by them over Sandra Bland or over many of the cases where race soldiers assault black women? But they'll raise hell when a black man harms a black woman.

So do you think black women don't want to be on equal standing with black men?

They already are on equal standing with black men. With the way the black family structure is today there is no family hierarchy anymore.

With some of the answers some of ya'll give I'm convinced you never actually have conversations with women about these things. Go ask some black women you know if they feel they're on equal standing with men...
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
203
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…