kingblaze84
New member
janklow;3175424 said:why are we putting quotes around "freedom" there? is this a scam where Libya is not actually going to be free of Gadafi? or just a vote saying you think he's a cool dude.
well, there is a good reason if you think it's going to make for a vast overall improvement for Libya. you might not like to spend the money for that reason as much as OTHER reasons --it's totally fine to prioritize-- but that's also not the same thing as "no good reason."
i also suspect this has a lot to do with a mindset that refuses to allow for the US having done anything good ever
the "internet position" is not about calling this war wasteful; as noted in the post you supposedly read above, it's about refusing to acknowledge anything good about the US in any way and needing to thus spin America's actions.
i remain convinced that there was a lot of hypocritical talk at the time from people who were incredibly against some government spending of any sort while simultaneously championing this mission and the related spending. welcome to politics, i suppose
That money wouldv'e been better spent bailing out American cities and states, so NO I don't see any good reason to have wasted money on this damn war. If you expect me to give American govt props for this, look for another poster. Americans need help now and don't benefit much from Gadafi being gone from power. I highly doubt Congress and the White House will get any major approval rating bumps from this but hey Gadafi is gone and yes he was a bad guy. Hopefully we can spend the next billion bucks helping American cities now, wouldnt that be great?
Last edited: