LMS Debate RD3. Is it better to date someone attractive and popular or intelligent and smart?

[atribecalledgabi]

mannnnn imma crip!

Ummm excuse me............

 

[CapitalB]

mannnnn imma crip!

Ummm excuse me............

hahahaha

u know what I meant..

u know I'm with the shit..

suuuuwooop and all that for that fire and blood!!!

cuhz! hahahaha

 

[CapitalB]

Gabi makes a case for attractiveness being appealing and popularity being attractive. What she doesn't properly address is whether or not those traits are better to date, she does NOT address whether those traits are better for relationships or even the long-term ramifications. You can lead to attract but they're not useful at all in sustaining relationships. Attraction is where it starts but intelligence and smartness is where it builds and maintains. If attractiveness is the beginning, intelligence is the next phase. She doesn't even so much as address the issues with those 2 qualities. Attractiveness and popularity make you look good, they make you stand out versus being overlooked but they fade over time and aren't qualities we even think about 4-5 years deep into a relationship with great importance relative to the surface of a person's soul. Intelligence and smartness is innate it's within us and we use what we have in our minds and fall in love with each other when this connection is made - hence why we refer to our significant others as "soul mates". Attractiveness and popularity do NOT make you better to date or build relationships with. They make you more likely to attract people but don't make you better to date or build a relationship with.The crux of what Gabi is arguing is attractiveness and appeal are more attractive than intelligence or smartness, this has no relevance as to whether or not it's better for you to date or build a relationship with versus what's in your mind and soul.

Another point, you need to be aware of the environment (street smarts) if I'm smart enough to realise good and bad traits in a person I can avoid a lot of the pitfalls which come with dating. If I'm smart enough to realise an opportunity to approach and attract a woman I can win out against the rest.

As for sex, everybody is having sex ugly or pretty but no woman wants to be looked at solely as a piece of meat to a lover. Even if they want to, women are smart enough to play up being angels and wifey material to a potential good man to establish their value in the dating pool in case she finds one who will save her. Some women are smart enough to know how to play the game and remain on top of their shit and avoid the pitfalls which may come with dating. Attractiveness is where it can start but smartness is the next phase. Dating becomes tedious the more you're jumping from partner to partner. We have an inner being and inner intelligence that we reach at some point, maturing, realising we desire more than just a physical relationship. Because no matter attractive or popular someone is, or how many partners or more sex you have, there's always going to be one person who will catch feelings and grow emotional because it is innate in us to desire an emotional attachment to one's mind and be stimulated by it. Better yet you will leave someone eventually for someone who you can establish this attachment to. Behind every bad bitch there's a nigga tired of fucking her and putting up with her bullshit.

Sex is more mental than it is physical, any man can control a woman's body the key is to control her mind. This is the basis of the art of seduction and the language of flirting. Cleopatra was called the whore of the nile and while Caesar and Marc Antony could surely find far prettier women than she, her ability to strategically control their minds and ruin many a man were legend and made her stand out above the rest and thrive in Egypt for decades even after her she began to bald after being poisoned and was threatened with war from every angle.


(from 2:14 on-going)

As for health, anybody can go out and have a baby, it takes a man to raise one tho. None of those traits you mentioned have any relevance as to whether or not they make you better to date and build a relationship with - I'd even charge it's a superficial response. Even if I'm intelligent and my significant other is beautiful, if she doesn't have an inner level of intelligence whatsoever - be it emotionally or mental stability, she becomes a liability to children and their future development and the CHOICES made in raising the family, this trickles down to use of finances, scholastic choices in where they go to school, social development, life choices and much more.

What's desireable and what's attractive has no relevance as to whether or not they're better qualities to date. Again these are superficial qualities wane. Being complimentary also has no relevance either, it only does if we're talking about preferences in that case neither looks nor intelligence matter in the realm of being attracted to one another. Your intelligence will make you more conscious of how to maintain your relationship and please your partner. You're going to pay closer attention to what pleases them and how to get better at it. Whereas someone utterly gorgeous or popular doesn't have or need the incentive to since they may feel they don't have as they'll always be able to find someone else when they get bored (or cheat). You're going to need a mental component to keep someone attracted to you or you'll become smart enough to realise not everybody is for you and to move on so you don't get hurt in this situation and become the bitter ex who couldn't read between the lines (taken further or be smart enough to recognise a broken heart and mend it). Dating can be tedious and breaking up hurts as hell but through our experiences hopefully we get smarter in how we approach the situation and how our standards and preferences change in what we desire and would be willing to compromise for.

As for overlooking smart people. We constantly put an emphasis and argue about who should have a good man or woman. We place a high value on them and pray we find them and those qualities of intelligence, smartness, morality, emotional intelligence are the defining qualities of such (anything else is bonus) the point here is we refer to their inner qualities. The fact this emphasis exists goes to tell you that subconsciously we know they are better for us. As for online dating, that's a terrible (and irrelevant) example, because smart people or less attractive people who would be overlooked in social settings can easily find other smart people on those sites tailored to their interests and it goes back to what I said earlier, in such a condensed pool you're still going to need an edge to standout amongst all the people competing. You're going to have to be smarter in how you go about pulling people and establishing a connection and building it into a relationship. Not everyone is attractive or very popular so if you're worried about being overlooked - online dating is the perfect place to find anyone for you and sure enough you will find one.

To end this debate, it is better to date someone who is intelligent and smart - whether it's emotional intelligence they have, wit, personality, morals, spirituality, social, intellectual intelligence, etc. all these are part of your intelligence and smartness. You need to build a deeper and lasting connection to someone in order to build a relationship. Whether you're being seduced mentally in the short run, or whether you're trying to build a relationship for the long term with prospects of marriage. These things deepen and enhance the experience and take it to another level - therefore they're better for you. The looks and popularity will surely fade, but intelligence is forever. You learn from experiences and it makes you smarter and more capable to deal with the game of life.

I leave you all with these classics to dwell on:

Spoiler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT7VnaGBKKY7

 

[atribecalledgabi]

Right??? Nigga waited his last post to unleash all these words

 

[CapitalB]

i hope the judges forget jus what the fuck this nigga was tryin to say by the time they get to the end of his post..

next round there really need to be a cap..

all jokes aside..

and rounds need to be cut down to 3 replies..

if u retarded and cant convey a message in that amount of time wit a word cap then u shouldnt be in a debate no damn way..

ita go take the jusges a whole day jus to review his shit to properly assess it. smmfh

 

[yellowtapesport]

Blah blah blah, artificial intelligence...Blah blah blah, Emotional intelligence.

Residential intelligence, commercial intelligence, blah blah blah, and the most important asexual intelligence.

And my next response will show community intelligence.

Check out this article at www.intelligence.com; I suggest you read it..

 

[BEAM]

Yea @Sion , your side was rather easy to argue.

You typed out waay too much, gave your opponent more to challenge.

Should've kept it concise, let her do the rambling.

Better luck next time.

 

[2stepz_ahead]

can we get the voting

@Mastery

@_Goldie_

@bussy_Getta

 

[CapitalB]

Yea @Sion , your side was rather easy to argue.

You typed out waay too much, gave your opponent more to challenge.

Should've kept it concise, let her do the rambling.

Better luck next time.

very rare when me and @BEAM agreeing..

and he even used my word of the day@ the underlined. lmmfao

a good argument is like a good steak..

when u dont know what ur doin u overseason it..

over cook it..

AND WORSE oversaturate it with sauce..

Sion in here tryin to mask the fact he dont know how to make a steak..

and like @BEAM said @Sion was givin the best cut to work wit..

we in here eatin that shit like..

 

[Mastery]

I agree with Boss that in the next round the replies should be cut down to 3 instead of 5. I don't agree on a word limit though haha.

There isn't really anything to criticize in this debate. Two power houses came together to give us a great debate. Both sides made their point, one, more concisely than the other, but that's besids the point.

There were no would've, could've, or should've in this debate. There were times during the debate when I thought @atribecalledgabi was going to win and times when I thought @Sion was going to win.

In the end, @Sion gets my vote in a closely contested debate.

Gabi it's still suwooop all day though, fuck Sion in that regard. You hear that Sion? Fuck you nigga! haha

 

[atribecalledgabi]

 

[CapitalB]

ill let the judges cast they vote before i say my piece..

but real shit i aint even read Sion's last two replies..

didnt even have the fuckin energy.

but it was sooooo many holes in that nigga's post i really wished Gab wouldve pounced on..

but based off her post we can still pull this off..

this nigga @Mastery actin like the man wit many faces right now tho! hahahaha

 

[yellowtapesport]

@Mastery this that 0.1% of the time you on some other shit my nigga

Type nigga that read them 'Upper Room' pamphlets on your windshield smh

 

[CapitalB]

@Mastery this that 0.1% of the time you on some other shit my nigga

Type nigga that read them 'Upper Room' pamphlets on your windshield smh

ol' readin jus to read ass nigga. lol

 

[Mastery]

but it was sooooo many holes in that nigga's post i really wished Gab wouldve pounced on..

But niggas mad at my vote? Must be two sides haha

 

[Mastery]

And yes @yellowtapesport and @BOSSExcellence

I fucking read!!! Lmao!

Do you niggas realize what I do for a living? That's all I fucking do is read!

 

[CapitalB]

but it was sooooo many holes in that nigga's post i really wished Gab wouldve pounced on..

But niggas mad at my vote? Must be two sides haha

yeh..

cause on the other side shit was airtight! hahaha

 

[CapitalB]

And yes @yellowtapesport and @BOSSExcellence

I fucking read!!! Lmao!

Do you niggas realize what I do for a living? That's all I fucking do is read!

and @Mastery its not jus about u..

everyone else doesnt read for a living..

we're doing this on our leisure..

who besides u want to work all day and come on here and have to "work" through Sion's post..

we not gettin a grade degree or paycheck for this shit..

there's no incentive to read through that bullshit.. not after a long ass day..

it takes the fun out of it??

if IM invested in this shit cause of me bein on the squad and I dont even want to read it.. whats gonna keep the casual reader interested and participating!?

its not..

its a reason why all the other debates is fun and entertaining besides Sion's hahahaha

i think there really should be a cap..

for the sake of the game..

 

[Mastery]

I hear you... And I agree with the 3 post cap.

Lmao! I read @Sion shit specifically while I'm at work nigga haha. Mobile FTW!!! Gotta merge the two for this long-winded ass nigga mayne. Lol

And I'm a judge bruh... I HAVE to read this everything to come to a decision.

 

[Mastery]

@_Goldie_ @"Bussy_Getta"