LMS Debate rd2. Does not paying child support warrant jail time

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
_Goldie_;c-9618495 said:
Man Allergens fell df off this round compared to his debate with Kai.

This nigga misquoting mfs, using wrong names in his analogies "U remember Ridley Scott... the cop?"
aubreybigga.png


This was another battle of opinion vs facts. It's cool to have an opinion on an issue, but at some point you're going to have to support it with facts and not only did Sion do that to support his stance but also to dismantle Allergen's.

Allergens made a few good points, but then he fucked it up with alot of dumb shit, ie comparing this topic to murder "I guess we should let all the killers out of jail, cuz life is hard" to not even being able to get the names in his arugment right.

Winner: Sion

This is why it's good to have judges with different points of view. We had the same winner but @_Goldie_ wasn't a fan of Solemns opinions while I was. Likewise, he was a big fan of Sions facts but I would have preferred some more of Sions opinion on the matter.
 
k7bqxi65naum.gif


Fuck being gracious, I'm a petty nigga

Yo Goldie, if you don't mind. Could you qoute and bold one of the arguments that Sion made, that really stood out to you?

Also Mastery do the same if u don't mind
 
Last edited:
This shit bodied your argument

Sion;c-9613730 said:
It's too easy to sit and say "well you shouldn't have laid with her/him !" in that case you shouldn't live in the hood if you don't want to be poor - STOP there's too many socioeconomic reasons for why these things occur and human nature is impossible to predict. That's why we go to court, to deal with the consequences.

If a person is sent to jail the child support doesn't stop, it arrears and becomes even more expensive to deal with. It's impossible to work from a jail and write checks. Not to mention you still have to rehabilitate people to get them back into society and working. As the NY Times article showed, plenty of young people get caught up and as a result lose decent jobs going to jail and then have to work even harder to find a new one that's even able to take care of the debt owed. The economic damage ? Approximately $35 billion nationwide. The cycle continues. There is a difference between the UNWILLING and the UNABLE.

Not only did he provide info on how flawed the system is, he presented a great solution to the issue.

Sion;c-9618181 said:
There are other means that can be used to extract child support payments that can't be paid back. Child support payments could be decided by actual income made not pre-tax or imputed income. By jailing people for child support you create a vicious cycle which affects not only the individual but the entire family structure destroying it. You can penalise people for missing payments but jail time is absolutely unnecessary. It's not about having no consequences it's about creating a system that is fair and actually works. If someone owed me money the last thing I'd want to hear is that they're sitting in a 6 by 4 because I know they can't work from one to pay me what is owed. I'd prefer to instead impose child support come from their actual income made and deposited to me as opposed to pretax, I'd do everything in my power to make sure they have the means to be able to work to pay me every dime owed. Having a child support judgement against one's name makes it harder to apply for credit and get loans which is good enough punishment but to throw them in jail and fuck up their ability to make money ? Doesn't make sense and doesn't work.

 
7figz;c-9618276 said:
Of course it warrants going to jail...

... for the mother !
I kid... I kid. My vote's for Sion. It probably costs more to keep somebody in jail than the government pays for in "supporting a child", and they need to reform their outrageous system before thinking about putting people in jail.

My nigga said "it probably costs more to keep somebody in jail than the government pays for supporting a child"

I cant even bruh..
 
SolemnSauce;c-9618582 said:
Might as well have been an all female forum and I had to debate if rape is ok

Nah nigga you dropped the ball on this one. You didn't even mention the fact that the responsible fathers stay on top of it. You don't automatically get thrown in jail for not paying.

To stay out of jail, go to the contempt of court hearing prepared to show that you have not deliberately disobeyed the court’s order to pay child support. You may have to convince the judge that you’re not as irresponsible as it appears. Preparing evidence is a must.

Your first step is to show why you didn’t pay. If you’ve been out of work, get a sworn statement from your most recent employer stating why you were let go. If you went job searching but had no luck, provide records of when you interviewed or filled out an application and with whom you spoke.

Next, you must explain why you didn’t request a modification hearing when it became evident that you couldn’t meet your support obligation.

Judges rarely put a parent in jail for contempt of court. Usually, it happens only if an income-withholding order and a wage garnishment won’t work. Courts recognize that a jailed parent cannot earn money to make child support payments.

Now that all of that is framed for the responsible parent, you should have focused on the deadbeats who skirt the system in an effort NOT to pay child support. Men who won't work on purpose because they don't want to pay. Men who strictly work under the table, etc. There is a few ways you could have taken this.

 
My vote goes to the Sauce. NH

Stepped into the shoes of a devils advocate and actually opened my eyes to the other side or this shit.

Asked good personal questions, i felt that shit.

I still side with Sions side or course, but my perspective definitely shifted.

Best debate so far.
 
Mastery;c-9618611 said:
SolemnSauce;c-9618582 said:
Might as well have been an all female forum and I had to debate if rape is ok

Nah nigga you dropped the ball on this one. You didn't even mention the fact that the responsible fathers stay on top of it. You don't automatically get thrown in jail for not paying.

To stay out of jail, go to the contempt of court hearing prepared to show that you have not deliberately disobeyed the court’s order to pay child support. You may have to convince the judge that you’re not as irresponsible as it appears. Preparing evidence is a must.

Your first step is to show why you didn’t pay. If you’ve been out of work, get a sworn statement from your most recent employer stating why you were let go. If you went job searching but had no luck, provide records of when you interviewed or filled out an application and with whom you spoke.

Next, you must explain why you didn’t request a modification hearing when it became evident that you couldn’t meet your support obligation.

Judges rarely put a parent in jail for contempt of court. Usually, it happens only if an income-withholding order and a wage garnishment won’t work. Courts recognize that a jailed parent cannot earn money to make child support payments.

Now that all of that is framed for the responsible parent, you should have focused on the deadbeats who skirt the system in an effort NOT to pay child support. Men who won't work on purpose because they don't want to pay. Men who strictly work under the table, etc. There is a few ways you could have taken this.

Didnt have to mention things that you already know are flawed in his argument. I assumed the audience was smart enough to know that.
 
Last edited:
I explained the reasoning of the system due to that. Without having to explain aint shit niggaz to niggaz who know what aint shit niggaz do.
 
This is a debate though. You can't assume the audience knows anything. You should assume the audience knows nothing and paint the picture for them.

If we go off assumptions, then Sion wins the debate before it even starts due to the side he was arguing.

You could have won my dude. I just felt you didn't bring the heat I know you could. You were supposed to be the Trump to his Clinton except you didn't do enough.
 
Mastery;c-9618723 said:
This is a debate though. You can't assume the audience knows anything. You should assume the audience knows nothing and paint the picture for them.

If we go off assumptions, then Sion wins the debate before it even starts due to the side he was arguing.

You could have won my dude. I just felt you didn't bring the heat I know you could. You were supposed to be the Trump to his Clinton except you didn't do enough.

Nah truth be told, I didn't read any of his reponses and wrote every reponses while I took my morning dump. So he deserved to win, im just saying the nigga aint out Fox me b.
 
Last edited:
SolemnSauce;c-9618726 said:
Mastery;c-9618723 said:
This is a debate though. You can't assume the audience knows anything. You should assume the audience knows nothing and paint the picture for them.

If we go off assumptions, then Sion wins the debate before it even starts due to the side he was arguing.

You could have won my dude. I just felt you didn't bring the heat I know you could. You were supposed to be the Trump to his Clinton except you didn't do enough.

Nah truth be told, I didn't read any of his reponses and wrote every reponses while I took my morning dump. So he deserved to win, im just saying the nigga aint out Fox me b.

Well you just confirmed what I said from the get-go. You didn't put forth maximal effort and it cost you the W. Even so, I still had it neck and neck.
 
Mastery;c-9618738 said:
SolemnSauce;c-9618726 said:
Mastery;c-9618723 said:
This is a debate though. You can't assume the audience knows anything. You should assume the audience knows nothing and paint the picture for them.

If we go off assumptions, then Sion wins the debate before it even starts due to the side he was arguing.

You could have won my dude. I just felt you didn't bring the heat I know you could. You were supposed to be the Trump to his Clinton except you didn't do enough.

Nah truth be told, I didn't read any of his reponses and wrote every reponses while I took my morning dump. So he deserved to win, im just saying the nigga aint out Fox me b.

Well you just confirmed what I said from the get-go. You didn't put forth maximal effort and it cost you the W. Even so, I still had it neck and neck.

Shots

u617qzx8xw55.gif


I see u
 
SolemnSauce;c-9618750 said:
Mastery;c-9618738 said:
SolemnSauce;c-9618726 said:
Mastery;c-9618723 said:
This is a debate though. You can't assume the audience knows anything. You should assume the audience knows nothing and paint the picture for them.

If we go off assumptions, then Sion wins the debate before it even starts due to the side he was arguing.

You could have won my dude. I just felt you didn't bring the heat I know you could. You were supposed to be the Trump to his Clinton except you didn't do enough.

Nah truth be told, I didn't read any of his reponses and wrote every reponses while I took my morning dump. So he deserved to win, im just saying the nigga aint out Fox me b.

Well you just confirmed what I said from the get-go. You didn't put forth maximal effort and it cost you the W. Even so, I still had it neck and neck.

Shots

u617qzx8xw55.gif


I see u

Mastery;c-9618271 said:
This debate was close. It really was.

My vote goes to Sion. I felt Solemnsauce could have taken it had he stepped it up a little bit more.

Nah, no shots. Facts. Sion almost lost this debate... almost.

But who knows, maybe you killed Kai while you were taking a dump as well so this may have very well been your best effort.

3gawngzn258y.gif


 
Last edited:
Mastery;c-9618782 said:
SolemnSauce;c-9618750 said:
Mastery;c-9618738 said:
SolemnSauce;c-9618726 said:
Mastery;c-9618723 said:
This is a debate though. You can't assume the audience knows anything. You should assume the audience knows nothing and paint the picture for them.

If we go off assumptions, then Sion wins the debate before it even starts due to the side he was arguing.

You could have won my dude. I just felt you didn't bring the heat I know you could. You were supposed to be the Trump to his Clinton except you didn't do enough.

Nah truth be told, I didn't read any of his reponses and wrote every reponses while I took my morning dump. So he deserved to win, im just saying the nigga aint out Fox me b.

Well you just confirmed what I said from the get-go. You didn't put forth maximal effort and it cost you the W. Even so, I still had it neck and neck.

Shots

u617qzx8xw55.gif


I see u

Mastery;c-9618271 said:
This debate was close. It really was.

My vote goes to Sion. I felt Solemnsauce could have taken it had he stepped it up a little bit more.

Nah, no shots. Facts. Sion almost lost this debate... almost.

But who knows, maybe you killed Kai while you were taking a dump as well so this may have very well been your best effort.

3gawngzn258y.gif

pikc54v41nfx.png


Da nerve
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
148
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…