LMS Debate Lou_cypher vs ZZombie. Should PARENTS be held legally responsible for....

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:
zzombie;9529726 said:
BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:
it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..

Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.

what you are doing is misrepresenting reality

kinda like 1+1 is 2

we are assuming that both 1s are equal.

this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.

you have to present it in a way so it will be true.

space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations

math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.

again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.

SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.

1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.
 
zzombie;9529772 said:
2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:
zzombie;9529726 said:
BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:
it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..

Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.

what you are doing is misrepresenting reality

kinda like 1+1 is 2

we are assuming that both 1s are equal.

this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.

you have to present it in a way so it will be true.

space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations

math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.

again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.

SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.

1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.

i said travel ...i didnt say understand.

but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.

a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....

as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.

so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009

makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth
 
These chicks in the "insecure" thread got me tight!! If we're doing the battle of the sexes next , I WANT IN!

@atribecalledgabi , be ready nigga!

EzBOWN.gif


 
_Goldie_;9529788 said:
These chicks in the "insecure" thread got me tight!! If we're doing the battle of the sexes next , I WANT IN!

@atribecalledgabi , be ready nigga!

EzBOWN.gif

lol what thread is that??
 
_Goldie_;9529788 said:
These chicks in the "insecure" thread got me tight!! If we're doing the battle of the sexes next , I WANT IN!

@atribecalledgabi , be ready nigga!

EzBOWN.gif

we doing battle of the sexes......an i will remember
 
2stepz_ahead;9529781 said:
zzombie;9529772 said:
2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:
zzombie;9529726 said:
BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:
it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..

Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.

what you are doing is misrepresenting reality

kinda like 1+1 is 2

we are assuming that both 1s are equal.

this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.

you have to present it in a way so it will be true.

space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations

math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.

again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.

SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.

1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.

i said travel ...i didnt say understand.

but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.

a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....

as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.

so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009

makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth

Just because you understand something it does not follow that you can control it because controlling it maybe impossible. Nuclear explosions do not just keep on going because there is a limited amount of fission material in each bomb. The perfect 1 is the only real 1

ALL YOU ARE DOING IS misrepresenting the math so in other words you are just making shit up.
 
_Goldie_;9529801 said:
One of the best shows in 2016

The feelings from the females start around page 9 or 10
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/551443/issa-rae-hbo-show-insecure-oct-9/p1

awwww yeh..

fam i couldve told u and spared u ur feelings..

when it comes to these tv shows..

its best to align urself on the side of Gabi.. she takes no prisoners!! im gonna go read for laughs..

but i havent seen the show. but i know whats goin on cause it was all over my FB feeds the other day..

shit should be hilarious..
 
Lmaooo I said what I had to say in the insecure thread and i wasnt even thinkin about it no more but here come @_Goldie_ bringing up old shit and STILL mad lololol.
 
zzombie;9529806 said:
2stepz_ahead;9529781 said:
zzombie;9529772 said:
2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:
zzombie;9529726 said:
BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:
it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..

Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.

what you are doing is misrepresenting reality

kinda like 1+1 is 2

we are assuming that both 1s are equal.

this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.

you have to present it in a way so it will be true.

space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations

math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.

again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.

SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.

1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.

i said travel ...i didnt say understand.

but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.

a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....

as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.

so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009

makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth

Just because you understand something it does not follow that you can control it because controlling it maybe impossible. Nuclear explosions do not just keep on going because there is a limited amount of fission material in each bomb. The perfect 1 is the only real 1

ALL YOU ARE DOING IS misrepresenting the math so in other words you are just making shit up.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.false.proof.html

Here's one from the Dr. Math archives:

"Proof" that 1 + 1 = 1

a = 1

b = 1

a = b

a2 = b2

a2 - b2 = 0

(a-b)(a+b) = 0

(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)

1(a+b) = 0

(a+b) = 0

1 + 1 = 0

2 = 0

1 = 0

1 + 1 = 1

You'll want to read the detailed discussion in the archives. This false proof relies on dividing both sides of an equation by zero (disguised as a-b), whereas you can divide both sides of an equation by the same thing only as long as you are NOT dividing by zero.

And another:

"Proof": 2 = 1

a = b

a2 = ab

a2 - b2 = ab-b2

(a-b)(a+b) = b(a-b)

a+b = b

b+b = b

2b = b

2 = 1

What is wrong with this proof? Well, the fact that we got 2 = 1 is proof that the method of getting the solution was not mathematically sound

as i said.....it is how its presented
 
2stepz_ahead;9529942 said:
zzombie;9529806 said:
2stepz_ahead;9529781 said:
zzombie;9529772 said:
2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:
zzombie;9529726 said:
BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:
it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..

Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.

what you are doing is misrepresenting reality

kinda like 1+1 is 2

we are assuming that both 1s are equal.

this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.

you have to present it in a way so it will be true.

space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations

math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.

again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.

SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.

1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.

i said travel ...i didnt say understand.

but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.

a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....

as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.

so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009

makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth

Just because you understand something it does not follow that you can control it because controlling it maybe impossible. Nuclear explosions do not just keep on going because there is a limited amount of fission material in each bomb. The perfect 1 is the only real 1

ALL YOU ARE DOING IS misrepresenting the math so in other words you are just making shit up.
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.false.proof.html

Here's one from the Dr. Math archives:

"Proof" that 1 + 1 = 1

a = 1

b = 1

a = b

a2 = b2

a2 - b2 = 0

(a-b)(a+b) = 0

(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)

1(a+b) = 0

(a+b) = 0

1 + 1 = 0

2 = 0

1 = 0

1 + 1 = 1

You'll want to read the detailed discussion in the archives. This false proof relies on dividing both sides of an equation by zero (disguised as a-b), whereas you can divide both sides of an equation by the same thing only as long as you are NOT dividing by zero.

And another:

"Proof": 2 = 1

a = b

a2 = ab

a2 - b2 = ab-b2

(a-b)(a+b) = b(a-b)

a+b = b

b+b = b

2b = b

2 = 1

What is wrong with this proof? Well, the fact that we got 2 = 1 is proof that the method of getting the solution was not mathematically sound

as i said.....it is how its presented

you are misrepresenting things again..... i gave you the statement 1+1=2 not an abstract algebra equation that requires the use of variables.

The only way you CAN make 1+1= something other than 2 is by misrepresenting the actually numerical value of 1 which is why that equation works IT'S CALLED A FALSE PROOF FOR A REASON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_fallacy
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
77
Views
22
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…