BOSSExcellence;9529744 said:shut up nigga..
ur mentally limited.
No i am not. You tried to argue using a logical fallacy.... nigga that shit won't work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BOSSExcellence;9529744 said:shut up nigga..
ur mentally limited.
2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:zzombie;9529726 said:BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..
Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.
what you are doing is misrepresenting reality
kinda like 1+1 is 2
we are assuming that both 1s are equal.
this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.
you have to present it in a way so it will be true.
space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations
math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.
again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.
zzombie;9529772 said:2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:zzombie;9529726 said:BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..
Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.
what you are doing is misrepresenting reality
kinda like 1+1 is 2
we are assuming that both 1s are equal.
this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.
you have to present it in a way so it will be true.
space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations
math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.
again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.
SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.
1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.
_Goldie_;9529788 said:These chicks in the "insecure" thread got me tight!! If we're doing the battle of the sexes next , I WANT IN!
@atribecalledgabi , be ready nigga!
![]()
_Goldie_;9529788 said:These chicks in the "insecure" thread got me tight!! If we're doing the battle of the sexes next , I WANT IN!
@atribecalledgabi , be ready nigga!
![]()
2stepz_ahead;9529781 said:zzombie;9529772 said:2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:zzombie;9529726 said:BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..
Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.
what you are doing is misrepresenting reality
kinda like 1+1 is 2
we are assuming that both 1s are equal.
this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.
you have to present it in a way so it will be true.
space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations
math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.
again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.
SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.
1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.
i said travel ...i didnt say understand.
but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.
a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....
as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.
so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009
makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth
_Goldie_;9529801 said:One of the best shows in 2016
The feelings from the females start around page 9 or 10
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/551443/issa-rae-hbo-show-insecure-oct-9/p1
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.false.proof.htmlzzombie;9529806 said:2stepz_ahead;9529781 said:zzombie;9529772 said:2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:zzombie;9529726 said:BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..
Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.
what you are doing is misrepresenting reality
kinda like 1+1 is 2
we are assuming that both 1s are equal.
this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.
you have to present it in a way so it will be true.
space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations
math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.
again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.
SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.
1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.
i said travel ...i didnt say understand.
but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.
a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....
as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.
so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009
makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth
Just because you understand something it does not follow that you can control it because controlling it maybe impossible. Nuclear explosions do not just keep on going because there is a limited amount of fission material in each bomb. The perfect 1 is the only real 1
ALL YOU ARE DOING IS misrepresenting the math so in other words you are just making shit up.
2stepz_ahead;9529942 said:http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.false.proof.htmlzzombie;9529806 said:2stepz_ahead;9529781 said:zzombie;9529772 said:2stepz_ahead;9529753 said:zzombie;9529726 said:BOSSExcellence;9529713 said:it wouldnt be based on fallacies it would be based on perspective.. 1+1= 11 no it doesnt ADD up to 11 but two 1s TOGETHER is..
Yeah a false perspective. 1+1 is not 11 because 1+1 is it's own mathematical equation that has it's own meaning that represents a different numerical value that does not equal eleven.
what you are doing is misrepresenting reality
kinda like 1+1 is 2
we are assuming that both 1s are equal.
this is only true because it was simplified to not take into consideration anything else.
you have to present it in a way so it will be true.
space shuttles blow up all the time b...guess why. fukked up equations
math is true in the controlled environments we understand not outside the dimensions that we dont understand.
again its not infinite...otherwise we would have been able to understand the space time theory and solve it and travel using fission and fusion.
SMH.... MORE LOGICAL FALLACIES.
1 AS A mathematical concept refers to a singular there is no way for you to accurately represent the concept of a singular thing as being a plural. either 1 is 1 or it's not actually one human misunderstanding of that does not invalidate the concept of 1. WE DO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND FISSION AND FUSION we just have not had a way to make the latter practical yet.
i said travel ...i didnt say understand.
but if you understand it...then you can control it. i mean if the math is right....would you agree.
a nuclear explosion is control by understanding the math of the reaction.....otherwise whats stopping the reaction from keep reacting and circling the planet until we are all destroyed.....
as for the singular 1.....we are using the perfect 1. since when has two things in this universe been complete replicas, never.
so we use 1 without the 1.000000000000000000000009
makes it simplier but doenst make it the truth
Just because you understand something it does not follow that you can control it because controlling it maybe impossible. Nuclear explosions do not just keep on going because there is a limited amount of fission material in each bomb. The perfect 1 is the only real 1
ALL YOU ARE DOING IS misrepresenting the math so in other words you are just making shit up.
Here's one from the Dr. Math archives:
"Proof" that 1 + 1 = 1
a = 1
b = 1
a = b
a2 = b2
a2 - b2 = 0
(a-b)(a+b) = 0
(a-b)(a+b)/(a-b) = 0/(a-b)
1(a+b) = 0
(a+b) = 0
1 + 1 = 0
2 = 0
1 = 0
1 + 1 = 1
You'll want to read the detailed discussion in the archives. This false proof relies on dividing both sides of an equation by zero (disguised as a-b), whereas you can divide both sides of an equation by the same thing only as long as you are NOT dividing by zero.
And another:
"Proof": 2 = 1
a = b
a2 = ab
a2 - b2 = ab-b2
(a-b)(a+b) = b(a-b)
a+b = b
b+b = b
2b = b
2 = 1
What is wrong with this proof? Well, the fact that we got 2 = 1 is proof that the method of getting the solution was not mathematically sound
as i said.....it is how its presented