In Something That Make Your Soul Burn Slow News: Man Ordered To Pay child Support For Her Baby...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
KingFreeman;9113566 said:
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

faint.gif

I think its like Chris Rock said, "Women go to court and say 'your honor, I was accustomed to this', and they get all type of child support. They probably sell the story to the judge that "even though its not his child, when he was with us he helped shoulder the load, I cant do it by myself without some continued financial support from him"...which is BS
 
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

Daaaaamn that's some scary shit, there's so many fine ass baby mamas out there (most women over 26). I'll keep this in mind if I ever shack up with a chick who has a kid, but these policies are going to make a lot of men avoid marriage and serious relationships if these lawmakers and judges keep fucking things up.
 
Last edited:
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is fucked up - end... of.... story.
 
Last edited:
BiblicalAtheist ;9113378 said:
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

If it the same reasoning as here:

If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life.

Not even worth the risk.

What if he dies or gets locked up?

Guess who's gonna have to pay then?
 
deadeye;9115813 said:
BiblicalAtheist ;9113378 said:
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

If it the same reasoning as here:

If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life.

Not even worth the risk.

What if he dies or gets locked up?

Guess who's gonna have to pay then?

So what's the explanation for this fuckery? Does the judicial system feel that woman can't handle their responsibilities as an adult? I don't see any other reason why a child is forced on someone.

 
7figz;9115748 said:
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is fucked up - end... of.... story.

You can't just gloss over being separated for 16 years and not getting divorced. Yes, the the law is fucked up but that 16 years is not just some small detail in this
 
Last edited:
7figz;9115748 said:
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is fucked up - end... of.... story.

Word son

How the hell fems and they fembots manage to make this the husbands fault is beyond me.
 
kingblaze84;9115529 said:
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

Daaaaamn that's some scary shit, there's so many fine ass baby mamas out there (most women over 26). I'll keep this in mind if I ever shack up with a chick who has a kid, but these policies are going to make a lot of men avoid marriage and serious relationships if these lawmakers and judges keep fucking things up.

These policies are gonna lead to alot of situations where as Chris Rock said "He shouldnt of killed her........but I understand"
 
They probably didn't divorce because it would've been "expensive" or complicating. You might as well do it because it gets worse when you stay.
 
I didn't get divorced because I didn't have the money is what people always say. divorce is expensive when u fighting each other. if y'all not fighting over homes and shit its really not that expensive. you can do it yourself for a few hundred. this nigga been split like 16 years. in 16 years he couldn't go to the chick and say yo I got this 500 and imma go down to the courthouse file these papers and u don't have to do shit. I mean literally she didn't have to do shit. it would have been uncontested and the judge would have signed off. its his fault he is in this position.
 
numbaz...80's baby;9115898 said:
deadeye;9115813 said:
BiblicalAtheist ;9113378 said:
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

If it the same reasoning as here:

If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life.

Not even worth the risk.

What if he dies or gets locked up?

Guess who's gonna have to pay then?

So what's the explanation for this fuckery? Does the judicial system feel that woman can't handle their responsibilities as an adult? I don't see any other reason why a child is forced on someone.

Don't try to find logic in this, because there isn't any.

Basically, the game is rigged.......and not in men's favor.

The only way to win is if you don't play.
 
blackrain;9115900 said:
7figz;9115748 said:
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is fucked up - end... of.... story.

You can't just gloss over being separated for 16 years and not getting divorced. Yes, the the law is fucked up but that 16 years is not just some small detail in this

Regardless of whether or not he followed through with a divorce, it doesn't make sense to require that man to pay for a child that clearly isn't his.
 
Last edited:
deadeye;9118128 said:
blackrain;9115900 said:
7figz;9115748 said:
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is fucked up - end... of.... story.

You can't just gloss over being separated for 16 years and not getting divorced. Yes, the the law is fucked up but that 16 years is not just some small detail in this

Regardless of whether or not he followed through with a divorce, it doesn't make sense to require that man to pay for a child that clearly isn't his.

Never said it did make sense...but don't leave yourself open to some bullshit for 16 years and then complain when bullshit happens. Shit if he had died legally because she's still his wife she would've been given all his shit....you can't play games with your future like that and for 16 years this dude did. He got a raw deal because of a fucked up law but I can't have but so much sympathy for somebody who ain't proactive against protecting themselves from bullshit
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
58
Views
101
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…