In Something That Make Your Soul Burn Slow News: Man Ordered To Pay child Support For Her Baby...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Marriage it self is not the issue in this case. They should have gotten a divorce a long time ago. Why let it go to the way side for 16 years?
 
The woman is dirty man takin' that money. The other guy has no pride but fuck it, free gwup.

Yeah 100 could not have been me
 
Last edited:
It's easy to know this is wrong, when you don't start entertaining all of that convoluted biased logic the law uses.

The law's wrong, and I'm sure she could do something about it so she's probably wrong too.
 
Last edited:
Those fools in Iowa allowed that stupid law to pass. Whoever is on the birth certificate should be the one paying for support. If her husband did not agree to adopt the child then this is bogus.
 
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

 
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

Because the government don't want to pay for that child.
 
taeboo;9111651 said:
Marriage it self is not the issue in this case. They should have gotten a divorce a long time ago. Why let it go to the way side for 16 years?

As wrong as the courts were, this is a damn good point. In life there's often consequences for ignorance.

No logical reason why that divorce shouldn't have been finalized after 16 years. This has to be the result of simpish behavior. Might've even been hitting his wife off and on. Nigga had a damn target sign on his back far as she, or they, we're concerned. The poor simple simone didn't stand a chance.
 
Last edited:
KingFreeman;9110128 said:
jono;9110101 said:
KingFreeman;9110095 said:
Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.

That shit ain't her fault. Its the state law. He needs to gun down the legislature.

This shit awful and the other dude grinning hard as fuck right now.

Nah ol girl and dude with the slick grin getting clapped.

DCZwKA.gif

Right, cuz she could always give him his $$$ back every month. But you know these hoes have no morals and proud of being an adult that gets taken cared of.

Will Munny;9110163 said:
Why on earth would any male want to get married in this country?

This....

Man made laws made marriage undesirable.
 
Last edited:
mryounggun;9110190 said:
The law is the law. There will always be these sorts of one off situations where the law fucks someone over.

Outrage should really be aimed at the wife.

The law is blatant bullshit. Outrage needs to be aimed at the law too. Nobody would have a reason to be mad at the wife if a dumbass law wasn't in place.
 
Last edited:
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

If it the same reasoning as here:

If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life.
 
lethal5;9112779 said:
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a bitch and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???

faint.gif


 
yea i ain't got much sympathy on this one....should've got that final divorce paperwork and you would t be worrying bout this dumb shit
 
taeboo;9111651 said:
Marriage it self is not the issue in this case. They should have gotten a divorce a long time ago. Why let it go to the way side for 16 years?

This.. How u separated for 16 years without signing divorce papers to make it official?.. That makes no sense..

16 years...
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
58
Views
101
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…