KingFreeman
New member
Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
KingFreeman;9110095 said:Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
1CK1S;547507 said:In Which It Isnt't His!
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
jono;9110101 said:KingFreeman;9110095 said:Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
That shit ain't her fault. Its the state law. He needs to gun down the legislature.
This shit awful and the other dude grinning hard as fuck right now.
bununs alias;9110111 said:1CK1S;547507 said:In Which It Isnt't His!
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
if they are still legally married, who petitioned for support, the wife ?
1CK1S;547507 said:In Which It Isnt't His!
A man was shocked when he was ordered to pay child support to a his former wife for a child she had with her current boyfriend.
45-year-old Joe Vandusen received a letter from the Iowa Department of Human Services, notifying him that he would have to pay support for the child, although he is not the father.
The Davenport man is protesting the new state law that requires him to financially support the child who is not his.
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
One year ago, his wife gave birth to a baby by another man, but the state is coming after him for child support.
Vandusen contact the Iowa Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) to say that he is not the biological father of his estranged wife’s child and he offered to take a paternity test to prove it.
However, he was told that it does not matter whether he is the father or not.
“They said that since I am still legally married, I will be responsible for child support,” Vandusen said.
A spokesperson for Human Services said that in a case like this, the husband is considered the legal father of his wife’s child.
Other states have similar laws, which are intended to ensure that all children receive adequate financial support.
Vandusen said that he recently lost his job and does not have the money to pay child support or for an attorney to file for divorce.
mryounggun;9110190 said:The law is the law. There will always be these sorts of one off situations where the law fucks someone over.
Outrage should really be aimed at the wife.
BiblicalAtheist ;9110727 said:Happy father's day?
BiblicalAtheist ;9110727 said:Happy father's day?
Will Munny;9110163 said:Why on earth would any male want to get married in this country?