If adam and eve only had two sons and no daughters where did humanity come from?

[ItzGravitation]

at some point of time two men could procreate

or

They fucced their mother

or

The women werent too important so they didnt get mentioned

most likely adam had daughters that we dont know about

but those first to were funny

 

[glowy]

It's something that was overlooked by the people who wrote the bible.

 

[One Spliff]

It's something that was overlooked by the people who wrote the bible.

no, the people who read it quite clearly overlooked something.

the symbolism obviously went over your head.

so foolish.

 

[major pain]

who wants to take a stab at it

You obviously dont read about this much do you? They had three NAMED sons. Cain, Abel, and Seth.... They also had many other children not named.

Passage Genesis 5:4:
4And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

 

[ThaChozenWun]

You obviously dont read about this much do you? They had three NAMED sons. Cain, Abel, and Seth.... They also had many other children not named.

Passage Genesis 5:4:

4And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

So the females must not have been important to life? They must not be important in gods eyes in general. Also were Adam n Eve married? If they are the only ones they could not be have been truly married without someone there, they commited sin then. But smh@ god for not thinking women were important enough to mention.

 

[major pain]

So the females must not have been important to life? They must not be important in gods eyes in general. Also were Adam n Eve married? If they are the only ones they could not be have been truly married without someone there, they commited sin then. But smh@ god for not thinking women were important enough to mention.

What....MANY children were not named. Cain, Abel, and Seth. Why only these three... who knows? I'll assume its because of the importance of their stories though? Cain and Abel should be obvious to anyone remotely versed in the bible and Seth is where the lineage to Jesus can be traced. It could also be argued that they were married conditionally by God himself.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

What....MANY children were not named. Cain, Abel, and Seth. Why only these three... who knows? I'll assume its because of the importance of their stories though? Cain and Abel should be obvious to anyone remotely versed in the bible and Seth is where the lineage to Jesus can be traced. It could also be argued that they were married conditionally by God himself.

So basically your saying the females side of stories is not an important point of view, like i said women must not have been important if nothing about them was placed anywhere.

 

[major pain]

So basically your saying the females side of stories is not an important point of view, like i said women must not have been important if nothing about them was placed anywhere.

No, stop putting words in my mouth. I'm saying the stories themselves, regardless of male/female perspective are what is important.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

No, stop putting words in my mouth. I'm saying the stories themselves, regardless of male/female perspective are what is important.

I still find it hard to believe no females are mentioned you would think at least would have some sort of essential story to add.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

I always wonderEd why the few women of the bible was whores.

I dont remember any woman ever being quoted in the bible in a good way, it does seem as if the all women in that time were portrayed as whores.

 

[And Step]

Simple.

Adam and Eve were not the first nor only human beings on the planet.

If you read the scripture very carefully it alludes to the fact.

And if you knew the Hebrew text, it would in no way translate "In the Beginning". It would read "In a Beginning".

Big difference. Big difference.

Next question, Please.................

 

[One Spliff]

it should've started off...Once upon a time, in a land far far away..........lol.

A so according to scripture god created the everything in 6 days. Does that include the the other people you speak of? Cause it doesn't allude to that.

you're so dumb thats it actually hurts when i read your posts...

why do you post here ?

the symbolism in the bible quite clearly goes waaaaaaaaay over your head, and in turn you just make yourself look so stupid...

ok i get it...u get kicks out of postin on a religious forum and making fun of christians, but dont you ever get bored of looking dumb ?

lol @ u believing the 6 days is literal, or anything in the bible is literal...

seriously...just stop.

 

[One Spliff]

and you constantly respond. Lol
how smart are you to read my post, then accuse me of believing the shit. Lol
how smart are you for calling me dumb yet millions of people take the bible literaly?
You call me dumb but can NEVER answer any question I post. And when you do you get mad and fustrated when I or anyone exspose hole in your weak theories.

Having said that. Your one of my favorite responders. Lol

if show a will to learn, then thats different...but clearly just wana make fun and mock...i dont get it...

you show intrest and you care, because if u didnt you wouldnt be here...but do u actually want to be enlightened or stay supressed ?...it really is your choice.

the bible has many scriptures some literal some figurative, symbolic, cryptic....its quite clear to anyone who isnt a dumbass which are which, your job is to decipher it and find the wisdom and knowledge needed to do so.

most of the symbolism is explained in other parts...it says quite clearly 1 day on earth is like 1000 in heaven...but thats just 1 example....really what that 6 days equates to is the time of creation to the time of the end..

really this is a waste of time, because evidently you dont wana learn anything.

 

[dholt23]

You obviously dont read about this much do you? They had three NAMED sons. Cain, Abel, and Seth.... They also had many other children not named.

Passage Genesis 5:4:

4And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

800 years thats a long time what diet was they on

 

[And Step]

Your reaching and trying too hard, bro. You have a disquieting doubt about you t hat screams insecurity and uncertainty. It's cool. Off the couch for a moment.

But the scripture I was alluding to was the fact it mentions the existence of other people in the opening chapter on two occasions. Secondly, If you read Hebrew and even Arabic. The Scripture doesn't really translate into six days, but rather six periods of time. The word "Yom" has many different meanings, depending on how you use it. The English Translators took liberty with the translation because they didn't know what each period of time consisted of. So they arbitrarily assigned a time period to it.

You arguing against the scripture on the basis of a poorly translated english version is like me arguing against spaghetti because I had a bad plate of it.

 

[And Step]

For clarity sake, Both Arabic and Hebrew have a word called Yaum or Yom, that translates into a period of time. Some translators call it Day but it really means a period of time.

Day of Judgement and Day of Atonement are not talking of particular 24 hour periods, but a period of time for those specific functions. The day is symbolic of light or revelation before the Judgment full force comes down. In other words before you have to pay the piper. This is a period of time for you to get your shit together before the Creator or Universe, or whatever force that controls the world we live in begins to cleanse itself of unwanted burdens.

 

[And Step]

So why didn't god bless the translators so everyone would have the opportunity to learn his word? You mean to tell me I could go to hell because when I made the attemp to learn his word, it's some miss translated shit?
I blame god for this.

Because they were devils. They intentionally did it.

But now he is blessing you with some insight through me, so if you choose to remain ignorant after I showed you a little bit, then it's your fault.

If you don't know, now you know, nigga.............................

 

[And Step]

Lol. Ok. So now if I don't accept YOUR translation than I'm ignorant? Boy that way of thinking sounds familiar.

No. What I am telling you is go study it for yourself.Like I did. Don't take my word for it.

Plus that is hypocritical. You keep ramming down peoples throat what the Bible says. Be balanced and quit being lazy, my nigga.

 

[purecomp]

And Step is currently servin niggaz. Glad to see somebody that isn't blind or brainwashed. Keep it up, my nigga.

 

[TX_Made713]

Simple.

Adam and Eve were not the first nor only human beings on the planet.

If you read the scripture very carefully it alludes to the fact.

And if you knew the Hebrew text, it would in no way translate "In the Beginning". It would read "In a Beginning".

Big difference. Big difference.

Next question, Please.................

did you get the from an article?

it translates "In beginning" the the/or a is implied.....if you've read hebrew you would know that