northside7
New member
Batman.;6051728 said:Fucking retards. Jesus Christ.
And someone said five mothers would make a difference lmao
Smdh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Batman.;6051728 said:Fucking retards. Jesus Christ.
BIRGGin;6051519 said:trying to ruin a mans life
Yeh, they tried to, but they couldn't get it to be admissible; shit would've been objected to if they tried to slide it into a closing argument too.Lil Loca;6051814 said:Gold_Certificate;6051792 said:Without proof, a "negative" character is a "negative" character witness; one who makes negative claims about someone's character based on their experiences with them.Lil Loca;6051733 said:Gold_Certificate;6051706 said:It makes perfect sense bruh. One witness saying that Zimmerman is a "racist molester", based on their experiences with him would be on the same level as another witness saying Treyvon was a "violent thug", based on their experiences with him; unless either of them had proof, they'd both be witnesses making negative claims about Zimmerman's and Treyvon's character. Like I said, "negative" character witnesses.Lil Loca;6051570 said:Gold_Certificate;6051535 said:Sure it does. It'd be on the same level as the defense getting someone to say Treyvon was a "violent thug" or some shit. I don't recall any "negative" character witnesses being used by either side.Lil Loca;6051488 said:It doesn't, tho.
Testimony that the Zimmerman family is a racist, as well as the statement "these assholes always get away" can be used to give credence that Tray was stalked and killed because he was Black.
Plus, she claimed that shit happened more than 10 years ago; and I think she remained anonymous too.
Shit probably wasn't admissible.
LMAO at the bolded. Where did you pull that rebuttal out of your ass from? It makes no sense at all.
It doesn't matter how long ago it happened.
It also really doesn't matter if she anonymous, either. She might not want her parents to face humiliation.
Nice attempt at trolling, tho.
And the court ruled that there couldn't be anonymous witnesses, so any anonymity did matter.
I still doubt the prosecution would've chosen to use her testimony even if anonymity were allowed.
No, this still sounds like shit you pulled out of your ass. Trayvon has been characterized as a thug right from the start. There's really no reason why what she said couldn't have been included, especially if they did more research into it.
They didn't have to use the cousin as a witness. Her testimony could have been included in the closing arguments.
Like I said, nice try at trolling.
I don't think new information can be included in a closing argument.
The defense could include their animation, because it was a summation of their claims; but they would not have been allowed to include the text messages.
Bad character witnesses do more harm for defendants, not the prosecution.
And the defendants did all they could do to try to bring up text messages and other irrelevant shit about Tray.
DROSAIN_BOLT;6051746 said:stringer bell;6051714 said:
WHO IS THIS GUY AND HOW DOES HE KNOW THEY SAID THIS?
Lil Loca;6051753 said:And these are the fucking moronic bitches who were allowed to judge the verdict?
Another Juror said that she doesn't listen to the news or go on the internet.
All she does is watch the Today show.
These are the dumb white cunts deciding that a murderer can go free.
And that's exactly why they wanted those heauxz on the jury, anyway.
stringer bell;6051889 said:God.. Why could've Trayvon been on the phone with any other broad but her...