George Zimmerman Trial Thread (Found Not Guilty Jesus help us...)

[GettinLo]

Coward juror bitch on Anderson Cooper now

 

[Gold_Certificate]

It doesn't, tho.

Testimony that the Zimmerman family is a racist, as well as the statement "these assholes always get away" can be used to give credence that Tray was stalked and killed because he was Black.

Sure it does. It'd be on the same level as the defense getting someone to say Treyvon was a "violent thug" or some shit. I don't recall any "negative" character witnesses being used by either side.

Plus, she claimed that shit happened more than 10 years ago; and I think she remained anonymous too.

Shit probably wasn't admissible.

 

[GettinLo]

Juror says Rachel Jeantell was not a credible witness.. and felt inadequate to everyone in the courtroom...

Shit is purely biased... says Jeantell was in over her head...

Creepy ass Crakka = "the life THEY live and are living"

 

[stringer bell]

This woman who is speaking is juror B37.. The one who called Trayvon a boy of color...

 

[stringer bell]

Now this scumbag Ho'Mara being smug as ever.. sayin how dear people not expect this verdict...

 

[stringer bell]

This dumb bitch said Zimmerbitch is only guilty of not using good judgement.. Smh...

 

[Purr]

Man! The Hebrew Israelites are fucking idiots bruh.

@lechic what are you talkin about, what happened?

Are you a time traveler or something?

Are you serious? aight.

 

[GettinLo]

WOW Zimmerman learned a lesson...

 

[Gold_Certificate]

It doesn't, tho.

Testimony that the Zimmerman family is a racist, as well as the statement "these assholes always get away" can be used to give credence that Tray was stalked and killed because he was Black.

Sure it does. It'd be on the same level as the defense getting someone to say Treyvon was a "violent thug" or some shit. I don't recall any "negative" character witnesses being used by either side.

Plus, she claimed that shit happened more than 10 years ago; and I think she remained anonymous too.

Shit probably wasn't admissible.

LMAO at the bolded. Where did you pull that rebuttal out of your ass from? It makes no sense at all.

It doesn't matter how long ago it happened.

It also really doesn't matter if she anonymous, either. She might not want her parents to face humiliation.

Nice attempt at trolling, tho.

It makes perfect sense bruh. One witness saying that Zimmerman is a "racist molester", based on their experiences with him would be on the same level as another witness saying Treyvon was a "violent thug", based on their experiences with him; unless either of them had proof, they'd both be witnesses making negative claims about Zimmerman's and Treyvon's character. Like I said, "negative" character witnesses.

And the court ruled that there couldn't be anonymous witnesses, so any anonymity did matter.

I still doubt the prosecution would've chosen to use her testimony even if anonymity were allowed.

 

[stringer bell]

 

[Batman.]

Fucking retards. Jesus Christ.

 

[MARIO_DRO]

WHO IS THIS GUY AND HOW DOES HE KNOW THEY SAID THIS?

 

[Batman.]

And she thought Rachel Jeantel was in over her head? You both have the same IQ, bitch!

 

[stringer bell]

WHO IS THIS GUY AND HOW DOES HE KNOW THEY SAID THIS?

He is live blogging her interview on CNN...

 

[Dr.Chemix]

No shit, Zimmerman is connected.

 

[texas409]

I thought about this today the race war in America is similar to the Game of Thrones families.The whites are obviously the Lanisters

 

[MARIO_DRO]

No shit, Zimmerman is connected.

HIS DAD IS A JUDGE.. U THINK BUDDY AINT PULL NO STRINGS!

 

[stringer bell]

 

[stringer bell]

And these are the fucking moronic bitches who were allowed to judge the verdict?

Another Juror said that she doesn't listen to the news or go on the internet.

All she does is watch the Today show.

These are the dumb white cunts deciding that a murderer can go free.

And that's exactly why they wanted those heauxz on the jury, anyway.

This is same bitch on CNN...

 

[Gold_Certificate]

It doesn't, tho.

Testimony that the Zimmerman family is a racist, as well as the statement "these assholes always get away" can be used to give credence that Tray was stalked and killed because he was Black.

Sure it does. It'd be on the same level as the defense getting someone to say Treyvon was a "violent thug" or some shit. I don't recall any "negative" character witnesses being used by either side.

Plus, she claimed that shit happened more than 10 years ago; and I think she remained anonymous too.

Shit probably wasn't admissible.

LMAO at the bolded. Where did you pull that rebuttal out of your ass from? It makes no sense at all.

It doesn't matter how long ago it happened.

It also really doesn't matter if she anonymous, either. She might not want her parents to face humiliation.

Nice attempt at trolling, tho.

It makes perfect sense bruh. One witness saying that Zimmerman is a "racist molester", based on their experiences with him would be on the same level as another witness saying Treyvon was a "violent thug", based on their experiences with him; unless either of them had proof, they'd both be witnesses making negative claims about Zimmerman's and Treyvon's character. Like I said, "negative" character witnesses.

And the court ruled that there couldn't be anonymous witnesses, so any anonymity did matter.

I still doubt the prosecution would've chosen to use her testimony even if anonymity were allowed.

No, this still sounds like shit you pulled out of your ass. Trayvon has been characterized as a thug right from the start. There's really no reason why what she said couldn't have been included, especially if they did more research into it.

They didn't have to use the cousin as a witness. Her testimony could have been included in the closing arguments.

Like I said, nice try at trolling.

Without proof, a "negative" character is a "negative" character witness; one who makes negative claims about someone's character based on their experiences with them.

I don't think new information can be included in a closing argument.

The defense could include their animation, because it was a summation of their claims; but they would not have been allowed to include the text messages.