*f-cking dead* Amber Rose Organizing "Slut Walk" Protest To Combat Slut-Shaming

[not_osirus_jenkins]

Women who consider themselves as sluts or bitches are not women of substance.

i wouldnt want a woman who refers to herself as a slut or bitch raising my daughter.

 

[desertrain10]

Sexism and racism work together to create a hierarchical social structure where affluent white men are on top

And fosters an environment that is not only hostile for women but blks as well

You want equality well it's counterproductive to continue to to slut shame, subscribe to sexist double standards

Utter and total bullshit

Expound

You state that sexism and racism work in tandem to keep white men affluent and that's the reason why they are on top and every one else below.

But you discount that we live in a capitalistic democracy and that white people are the sole biggest population Therefore they will naturally be the most affluent population. If you remove sexism and racism whites will still be on top of the social structure because money and wealth are the greatest determining factors that decide status in a capitalistic society. Followed by race and then sex.

A capitalistic environment is intrinsically hostile because it's based on competition, IT'S the white family vs the black family for the use of economic resources. men have to play their role and women have to play their role when this works in harmony we are capable to attaining gains in this system when women/men engage in behaviors that fuck with this harmony we are weakened as a whole . Men will not respect sluts AND IF WE DON'T respect you we won't be inclined to marry you, because just like money pussy has value based on it's level of rarity. Now being that the family in the basic building block of any society if we don't marry you then it weaken black society within the usa.

so we slut shame you to disincentive behaviors that make you undesirable as mates.

Marriage between a woman and man is great and all

But it doesn't pay the bills

Just think back when families, marriages were supposedly the strongest we still were largely impoverished and/or treated like second class citizens

Has there ever been a time in America when the blk community not just pockets has prospered?

Smh

And still you chase the rich white man's patriarchy and wealth, when we should be focusing on creating economic/ social policies that uplift all types of families particularly the most fragile

I want his wealth no fucking doubt and any race not chasing that wealth is fucking stupid. Also the bolded maked no fucking sense of course marriage pays the bills married couples usually have two incomes or even if the wife is a housewife she can still find ways to economically contribute to the household.

Fuck uplifting all families. uplift the family of the competition???? WTF are you crazy

When black marriages were stronger we had a much better economic situation. Today they still treat us like second class citizens AND feminism has not helped us one bit. Now we are in a worse position, because we own nothing our communities are crime infested AND we cannot provide our children with jobs. our men have no respect for the women the women have no respect for the men and we seemingly have no morals.

AND YES THERE have been times when the black community has prospered in certain places black wall street and harlem for example.

As for patriarchy if a black patriarchy is what it takes to fix our social problems and get us to a place were we can economically compete with the other races in america then so be it. Winning is what counts not the feelings of one sex.

1. My point was marriage is not a cure for poverty. Two incomes help but marriage isnt going to magically uplift a family out of poverty.

We aren't marrying because when people feel as though they can't afford a wedding or to support a family they often choose not to marry

That has always been the case

Marriage has been largely for the well off

2.Harlem and Black WallStreet were the exception to the rule ...

3. Our problem isn't a lack of morals but instutionalized racism

4. Your insistence on blaming feminism for the state of blk America is ignorant and short sighted... Our problems began way before feminism made its way to Americas shores

5. The pursuit of the wealth and status of white men can be counterproductive

This idea that we could all be rich, well off families is not based in reality considering our current economic system

It has people working against their own economic interest, or voting for yet another tax cut for corporations hoping that will say be head of their own corporation

Doing so even if it's at the expense of funding to pay for a blk single mother to be able to afford for child care, or funding that to help programs that employ ex felons

shit is ridiculous

 

[zombie]

Sexism and racism work together to create a hierarchical social structure where affluent white men are on top

And fosters an environment that is not only hostile for women but blks as well

You want equality well it's counterproductive to continue to to slut shame, subscribe to sexist double standards

Utter and total bullshit

Expound

You state that sexism and racism work in tandem to keep white men affluent and that's the reason why they are on top and every one else below.

But you discount that we live in a capitalistic democracy and that white people are the sole biggest population Therefore they will naturally be the most affluent population. If you remove sexism and racism whites will still be on top of the social structure because money and wealth are the greatest determining factors that decide status in a capitalistic society. Followed by race and then sex.

A capitalistic environment is intrinsically hostile because it's based on competition, IT'S the white family vs the black family for the use of economic resources. men have to play their role and women have to play their role when this works in harmony we are capable to attaining gains in this system when women/men engage in behaviors that fuck with this harmony we are weakened as a whole . Men will not respect sluts AND IF WE DON'T respect you we won't be inclined to marry you, because just like money pussy has value based on it's level of rarity. Now being that the family in the basic building block of any society if we don't marry you then it weaken black society within the usa.

so we slut shame you to disincentive behaviors that make you undesirable as mates.

Marriage between a woman and man is great and all

But it doesn't pay the bills

Just think back when families, marriages were supposedly the strongest we still were largely impoverished and/or treated like second class citizens

Has there ever been a time in America when the blk community not just pockets has prospered?

Smh

And still you chase the rich white man's patriarchy and wealth, when we should be focusing on creating economic/ social policies that uplift all types of families particularly the most fragile

I want his wealth no fucking doubt and any race not chasing that wealth is fucking stupid. Also the bolded maked no fucking sense of course marriage pays the bills married couples usually have two incomes or even if the wife is a housewife she can still find ways to economically contribute to the household.

Fuck uplifting all families. uplift the family of the competition???? WTF are you crazy

When black marriages were stronger we had a much better economic situation. Today they still treat us like second class citizens AND feminism has not helped us one bit. Now we are in a worse position, because we own nothing our communities are crime infested AND we cannot provide our children with jobs. our men have no respect for the women the women have no respect for the men and we seemingly have no morals.

AND YES THERE have been times when the black community has prospered in certain places black wall street and harlem for example.

As for patriarchy if a black patriarchy is what it takes to fix our social problems and get us to a place were we can economically compete with the other races in america then so be it. Winning is what counts not the feelings of one sex.

1. My point was marriage is not a cure for poverty. Two incomes help but marriage isnt going to magically uplift a family out of poverty.

We aren't marrying because when people feel as though they can't afford a wedding or to support a family they often choose not to marry

That has always been the case

Marriage has been largely for the well off

2.Harlem and Black WallStreet were the exception to the rule ...

3. Our problem isn't a lack of morals but instutionalized racism

4. Your insistence on blaming feminism for the state of blk America is ignorant and short sighted... Our problems began way before feminism made its way to Americas shores

5. The pursuit of the wealth and status of white men can be counterproductive

This idea that we could all be rich, well off families is not based in reality considering our current economic system

It has people working against their own economic interest, or voting for yet another tax cut for corporations hoping that will say be head of their own corporation

Doing so even if it's at the expense of funding to pay for a blk single mother to be able to afford for child care, or funding that to help programs that employ ex felons

shit is ridiculous

1. you are taking my points to extremes i never meant them to be taken to, the only cure for poverty is wealth marriage is not a 100% way to build wealth but studies have shown than children born into married couples are richer and do better in life they are more intelligent and become richer adults thus over time marriage benefits the race because even if the parents stay poor odds are in their favor that their children will attain higher economic status
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/...y-has-grown/1CyqxfjZ4mUVBbWsuZ01zI/story.html

2. Harlem and black wall street are the shining examples but there were many more of less grander scale, today we have less than we did back then in terms of wealth not just money
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/08/30/black-incomes-are-up-but-wealth-isnt/

3. Our problems is lack of morals and instutionalized racism one of these two things we have it within our power to fix today. Yet don't because foolish ideologies like feminism have weakened our family structure and family plays a major role in creation ones morals and values.

4. Black problems began in slavery and continued pass the civil rights era but feminism exacerbated many of our issues look at the hate and disrespect black men have for black women now

5. The pursuit of wealth is the basis for the system we are living in, without wealth you are most likely going to be a victim. The black community is preyed upon because we don't have the affective economic strength to fight back, they don't over police higher class neighborhoods. There would be fewer black single mothers and ex-cons if we had that wealth. I don't know where you got this idea that i think we would all be super rich, no. Many of us will still be poor but this number would shrink and there condition would be better if we killed off certain ideologies.

In 2015 unless you are talking about economic power you are talking about nothing our social lives and feelings must also facilitate greater economic attainment.

 

[mc317]

BFFN Gang Bitches Famous For Nothing

 

[luke1733]

On the serious side, I have no problem with a slut and I think more shaming comes from women to women on that or fathers to protect daughters.

On the other side: that's gonna be one helluva orgy....I mean march if she pulls this off. Unfortunately, they'll probably have more guys there than women.

But really, really how many women you gonna have marching or protesting the right to be a slut? It's unrealistic

 

[Ubuntu1]

What do you think of the idea?

I agree with it. Shaming only women for engaging in the exact same sexual behavior that men do is irrational, I don't understand how anyone justifies it. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with either men or women being promiscuous (by whatever standard) even if it isn't always prudential.

I haven't read most of the thread.

 

[soul rattler]

Did this ever actually happen?

 

[smp4life]

I'm there!

 

[Bussy_Getta]

Did this ever actually happen?

Yes and it was amazing

 

[white sympathizer]

Stop bumping this old ass shit, dont nobody care about that tennis ball head bitch or her slut walk

 

[Scroter]

sluts dont walk they suck

 

[Louis Devinear]

Did this ever actually happen?

Yes and it was amazing

Liar

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Me the troll? Lol

The way u are stubbornly trying to make it seem as though no double standard exist, and male and female promiscuity are viewed by soceity in the same light leads me to believe u are the troll

As I already stated fact is guys who sleep around are perceived differently than women who do the same

It's undeniable

That's why I believe it's about policing womens bodies

If you can't even come to terms with that, we have nothing further to discuss

I'm not trolling. As I said before. I've explained why it's not a real double standard on multiple occasions, but if you'd like me to do so again I will.

For something to be a double standard, two parties have to be treated differently for some reason when all other things are equal.

There is a double standard when it comes to how women are paid because a woman can go into a company and do the same exact job as men (sometimes bettesexand still get paid a lower amount. That is a true double standard.

This whole slut vs playa bullshit isn't really a double standard because all other things are not equal due to traditional gender roles. The roles men and women are expected to play in sexuality and relationships are different. Men are expected to be the pursuers. Women are expected to be the discriminators and choosers.

Men get called playas or pimps or whatever you want to call it because if they have a lot of sex that means they have some set of skills or characteristics that lead to them getting chosen frequently. So besides simply having the sex, they are actually accomplishing something.

Women don't get that same respect when they have a lot of sex because they don't have to accomplish anything to have sex. It literally comes to them. Most women get hit on from sun up to sun down, so there is nothing particularly impressive getting a lot of dick. In fact, it really just meaning you're not playing that "discriminator" role too well.

The analogy I always use is that men are set up to be hunters and women are set up to be prey. The lion that can get the kill every time it goes out is going to be treated as a valued member of the pride. The gazelle that lays down and lets the lion get it is just food. There is nothing respectable about that.

It's not a double standard. That doesn't mean its fair. Women have the same urges men do, so they shouldn't necessarily be relegated solely to a role of discriminating between who offer is the best, but that's how the traditional gender roles are set up. Which is I've been saying this whole time that if you want to get rid of this so-called double standard, the best way is to get rid of the gender roles. And you don't do that by continuing to accept the role but complaining about the treatment you receive when you break the rules of that role. That's stupid

And lol @ women not accomplishing anything by having sex

While we may not always initiate contact, we accomplish and set the same goals as a man

And when we do intiate contact it can be with something as simple as a smile or a long stare

Than we also must first find a willing partner with whom find suitable to help satisfy our urges

But I disagress u admit women have the same urges men do and that all that needs to be said

We shouldn't be viewed any differently than men for acting on those urges

That is all that needs to be said

You can say that all you want and it will still be besides the point. Men aren't praised for simply having a it of sex. If that were the case dudes would get praised for buying prostitutes or fucking fat and/or ugly chicks with low self confidence and no standards, but that's not the case. Men get praised for having the tools necessary to get lots of sex from desirable females. That praise would make no sense for females because y'all don't need any special skills to get sex. No matter how much you sidestep that point, it will still be true.

 

[KingRenaissance]

I would eat Amber's asshole out like it was the Last Supper

 

[KingRenaissance]

and then I would reverse slam dunk my balls in that mouf of her

 

[Splackavelli]

Are there pictures or video footage of this slut walk?

 

[the dukester]

We have too many Amber Rose's, not enough Clare Huxtable's.......

I blame Wiz, Kanye, and Tyga, for wifeying whores, that gave other whores a platform.

 

[Swiffness!]

Yeah Amber didn't invent this, Feminists been doin Slut Walks for 5 years now.

Now, this "slut walk" thing... are there gonna be bare titties involved? Are the participants gonna be twerking while they walk?

Yes, actually. "Free the Nipple" is another feminist movement.

Are the bystanders guaranteed a blow job/quickie by the participants?

Google some feminist buzzwords and play your cards right.........

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Google some feminist buzzwords and play your cards right.........

Unlikely. A lot of the women that push this shit are also man haters.

 

[KingRenaissance]

We have too many Amber Rose's, not enough Clare Huxtable's.......

I blame Wiz, Kanye, and Tyga, for wifeying whores, that gave other whores a platform.

Let them whores b GREAT nigga