*f-cking dead* Amber Rose Organizing "Slut Walk" Protest To Combat Slut-Shaming

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
You ungrateful negros don't see the blessing that Amber has bestowed upon you. This heaux should be celebrated for her forward thinking......cheered for her contributions to all things perverted and scumbaggish. Thanks to Amber's diligent work and expertise.....all hoes and sluts will be assembled in one location at the same damn time....ripe for the picking in all of their promiscuous glory. She has taken the concept of "shooting fish in a barrel" & transmogrified it into an event of epic playa proportions. Pimps, tricks, players, simps, lames, pervs, squares.....all manner of man should be able to prosper from this grand assembly if they so choose to.
 
Last edited:
lol If you like fucking with hoes and sluts, you really don't need to have something like this to find them congregated. They are everywhere.

What we need is a grouping like this of respectable and feminine ladies because those are becoming harder to find.
 
The Lonious Monk;7879845 said:
desertrain10;7879758 said:
The Lonious Monk;7879575 said:
I don't understand this shit. What is wrong with slut shaming? If you are a slut, you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.

U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone

She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought

She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "slut" or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?

Simply expressing and exploring sexuality does not make a chick a slut. Only the most conservative and prudish people claim that. Fucking whoever whenever with little to no discrimination makes a chick a slut and that's not good or healthy for anyone.

I don't know if she's a slut or thot or not, but she's embracing it. If she wasn't a slut, you'd think she'd make the argument that she's not, denounce actual sluttery, and stick up for what she actually considers herself to be. But again, she is embracing that term, so there it is.

As long as a woman or man is practing safe sex and getting reg check ups, I don't see how a woman exploring her sexuality with whomever she pleases, whenever she pleases is any a more a threat to public safety than when men does it

Yet men are encouraged to sleep with as many women as possible

That's the problem

Black_Samson;7880343 said:
desertrain10;7879758 said:
The Lonious Monk;7879575 said:
I don't understand this shit. What is wrong with slut shaming? If you are a slut, you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.

U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone

She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought

She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "slut" or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?

Just cause it was serious for her dont mean it was.

The fact that kanye treated her like community pussy also takes away feom the point u are attemtpng to make.

With kim ye worships her like a lincoln continental with suicide doors.

With amber he was just showing off a 97 honda civic and the body kit he bought for it.

I dunno ...around the time of their "breakup" wasn't he on tour crying, talking about Amber? Lol

Now all the sudden she's this dirty hoe

Wiz obviously is the biggest offender

I just find it funny how one minute she's rewarded by these men for her behavior, the next she's shamed

It's just so counterproductive and self serving

 
desertrain10;7880592 said:
The Lonious Monk;7879845 said:
desertrain10;7879758 said:
The Lonious Monk;7879575 said:
I don't understand this shit. What is wrong with slut shaming? If you are a slut, you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.

U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone

She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought

She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "slut" or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?

Simply expressing and exploring sexuality does not make a chick a slut. Only the most conservative and prudish people claim that. Fucking whoever whenever with little to no discrimination makes a chick a slut and that's not good or healthy for anyone.

I don't know if she's a slut or thot or not, but she's embracing it. If she wasn't a slut, you'd think she'd make the argument that she's not, denounce actual sluttery, and stick up for what she actually considers herself to be. But again, she is embracing that term, so there it is.

As long as a woman or man is practing safe sex and getting reg check ups, I don't see how a woman exploring her sexuality with whomever she pleases, whenever she pleases is any a more a threat to public safety than when men does it

Yet men are encouraged to sleep with as many women as possible

That's the problem

Who said it was more of a threat than when men do it? And who encourages men to sleep with as many women as possible? My dad never told me to fuck every chick I met. I don't plan on telling my son (if I have one) to fuck every chick he sees. I've never actually heard any guy say that. Now granted there are dudes with that mindset, but it's not like there is a mandate out there for guys to be like that. Some dudes are sluts, some are prudes, and most lie somewhere in the middle, just like with women.

So no, that's not the problem. The problem is that instead of trying to strive for a world where virtues still mean something and doing a better job of holding men to a higher standard, ya'll women want to make the lower standard some women live by more acceptable. That shit is absolutely ridiculous to me. lol
 
I cant take the word slutwalk serious. I was smoking a blunt at 4am and laughed myself to a kush nap at that banner in the London picture. Everytime I see the word slut I think of the slutty pumpkin

how-i-met-your-mother-clip-slutty-pumpkin.png


 
The Lonious Monk;7880635 said:
desertrain10;7880592 said:
The Lonious Monk;7879845 said:
desertrain10;7879758 said:
The Lonious Monk;7879575 said:
I don't understand this shit. What is wrong with slut shaming? If you are a slut, you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.

U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone

She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought

She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "slut" or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?

Simply expressing and exploring sexuality does not make a chick a slut. Only the most conservative and prudish people claim that. Fucking whoever whenever with little to no discrimination makes a chick a slut and that's not good or healthy for anyone.

I don't know if she's a slut or thot or not, but she's embracing it. If she wasn't a slut, you'd think she'd make the argument that she's not, denounce actual sluttery, and stick up for what she actually considers herself to be. But again, she is embracing that term, so there it is.

As long as a woman or man is practing safe sex and getting reg check ups, I don't see how a woman exploring her sexuality with whomever she pleases, whenever she pleases is any a more a threat to public safety than when men does it

Yet men are encouraged to sleep with as many women as possible

That's the problem

Who said it was more of a threat than when men do it? And who encourages men to sleep with as many women as possible? My dad never told me to fuck every chick I met. I don't plan on telling my son (if I have one) to fuck every chick he sees. I've never actually heard any guy say that. Now granted there are dudes with that mindset, but it's not like there is a mandate out there for guys to be like that. Some dudes are sluts, some are prudes, and most lie somewhere in the middle, just like with women.

So no, that's not the problem. The problem is that instead of trying to strive for a world where virtues still mean something and doing a better job of holding men to a higher standard, ya'll women want to make the lower standard some women live by more acceptable. That shit is absolutely ridiculous to me. lol

So we don't live in a culture where young men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats", men who sleep with a lot of women are celebrated as "playas", and male virgins are chastised

While women are expected to keep their legs closed and "act like a lady"... Otherwise she's a "hoe","slut", "thot", etc

Ur being disingenuous

 
desertrain10;7880701 said:
So we don't live in a culture where young men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats", men who sleep with a lot of women are celebrated as "playas", and male virgins are chastised

While women are expected to keep their legs closed and "act like a lady"... Otherwise she's a "hoe","slut", "thot", etc

Ur being disingenuous

That's not what I said. Men are expected to go out and get the promiscuity out of their systems in hopes that when they do settle down they won't have that urge anymore. That is not the same thing as saying that men are encouraged to go out and fuck any and everything. Again, whether its men or women, simply having premarital sex does not make you a slut.

I've explained the "playa" thing a ton of times on here and why it's stupid that women constantly bring that up as a so called double standard. I can explain it again if you want, but to keep this present titangraph reasonable I'll skip it.

At the end of the day traditional gender roles when it comes to sex probably do need to be redefined, and there is nothing wrong with women striving to do that. Here's my problem. There are two ways that women could combat the old ways. They could do their part to destroy those gender roles. That means instead of waiting for some dude to come along and pick them up. They can be more proactive in securing what they want. That gives them the power to choose what they want and to do what they want while also allowing them to not be seen as someone that just gives it up to anyone who asks. The other option is to maintain the status quo as far as the roles go but strive to get the poor behavior exhibited by some males to be seen equally acceptable for females. Everything you're arguing is in support of that second option, when I believe women as a whole would display much more class and character in going that first route.
 
Never see girls that AREN'T sluts complain about slut shaming.. Hmm.

But on some real Shit, no one here hate sluts. They play their position. The issue is when they expect girlfriend or wife treatment.
 
The Lonious Monk;7880818 said:
desertrain10;7880701 said:
So we don't live in a culture where young men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats", men who sleep with a lot of women are celebrated as "playas", and male virgins are chastised

While women are expected to keep their legs closed and "act like a lady"... Otherwise she's a "hoe","slut", "thot", etc

Ur being disingenuous

That's not what I said. Men are expected to go out and get the promiscuity out of their systems in hopes that when they do settle down they won't have that urge anymore. That is not the same thing as saying that men are encouraged to go out and fuck any and everything. Again, whether its men or women, simply having premarital sex does not make you a slut.

I've explained the "playa" thing a ton of times on here and why it's stupid that women constantly bring that up as a so called double standard. I can explain it again if you want, but to keep this present titangraph reasonable I'll skip it.

At the end of the day traditional gender roles when it comes to sex probably do need to be redefined, and there is nothing wrong with women striving to do that. Here's my problem. There are two ways that women could combat the old ways. They could do their part to destroy those gender roles. That means instead of waiting for some dude to come along and pick them up. They can be more proactive in securing what they want. That gives them the power to choose what they want and to do what they want while also allowing them to not be seen as someone that just gives it up to anyone who asks. The other option is to maintain the status quo as far as the roles go but strive to get the poor behavior exhibited by some males to be seen equally acceptable for females. Everything you're arguing is in support of that second option, when I believe women as a whole would display much more class and character in going that first route.

Lol

Believe what u want

Fact remains a double standard exist

And I'm not totally getting how women becoming more "proactive with securing what they want" in the realm of love, sex and relationships would help change the minds of ppl who slut shame, subscribe to the double standard

What is comes down to is we live in a patriarchy. Men define what's acceptable or not.

Most guys grow up believing they are entitled to govern over women's bodies

Slut shaming is just a syptom of that

Things won't change until we as soceity begin to view women's sexuality in the same light as men's

 
Double standards are sometimes good things. All societies place limitations on human behavior not just legally but socially. There are certain behaviors that are discouraged.

Modern society is heading for a down fall. It's following a pattern that heralds it's death. The removal of social constraints leads to decadence then to downfall. It's happened over and over throughout history.

And feminism is playing a major part in this.

Feminism at best wants to create an egalitarianism between the sexes that cannot nor has it ever existed. At worst Feminism is misandry
 
If men and women are not allowed to feel they have the right to govern over the bodies of the opposite sex then why should a man get married???? Or any woman for that matter.

Women's sexuality is women's sexuality and men's are men's we are not the same. Like it or not biology dictates that men will always have a certain greater level of sexual freedom.
 
Y'all in for disappointment. Only butchy ass feminist are going to show up at this. The real sluts will be mocking those dykes online between gag sessions.
 
desertrain10;7880944 said:
The Lonious Monk;7880818 said:
desertrain10;7880701 said:
So we don't live in a culture where young men are encouraged to "sow their wild oats", men who sleep with a lot of women are celebrated as "playas", and male virgins are chastised

While women are expected to keep their legs closed and "act like a lady"... Otherwise she's a "hoe","slut", "thot", etc

Ur being disingenuous

That's not what I said. Men are expected to go out and get the promiscuity out of their systems in hopes that when they do settle down they won't have that urge anymore. That is not the same thing as saying that men are encouraged to go out and fuck any and everything. Again, whether its men or women, simply having premarital sex does not make you a slut.

I've explained the "playa" thing a ton of times on here and why it's stupid that women constantly bring that up as a so called double standard. I can explain it again if you want, but to keep this present titangraph reasonable I'll skip it.

At the end of the day traditional gender roles when it comes to sex probably do need to be redefined, and there is nothing wrong with women striving to do that. Here's my problem. There are two ways that women could combat the old ways. They could do their part to destroy those gender roles. That means instead of waiting for some dude to come along and pick them up. They can be more proactive in securing what they want. That gives them the power to choose what they want and to do what they want while also allowing them to not be seen as someone that just gives it up to anyone who asks. The other option is to maintain the status quo as far as the roles go but strive to get the poor behavior exhibited by some males to be seen equally acceptable for females. Everything you're arguing is in support of that second option, when I believe women as a whole would display much more class and character in going that first route.

Lol

Believe what u want

Fact remains a double standard exist

And I'm not totally getting how women becoming more "proactive with securing what they want" in the realm of love, sex and relationships would help change the minds of ppl who slut shame, subscribe to the double standard

What is comes down to is we live in a patriarchy. Men define what's acceptable or not.

Most guys grow up believing they are entitled to govern over women's bodies

Slut shaming is just a syptom of that

Things won't change until we as soceity begin to view women's sexuality in the same light as men's

It's funny how women are often (sometimes wrongfully) accused of being illogical and feminist arguments seem to have no logic to them.

You ask me how women being proactive will change minds. Well tell me, if people believe that sluts are loose women who give it up to anyone, how could they possibly believe that if women start to exercise their own selectivity and therefore make the pool of sexual partners an exclusive group instead of any dude that comes along at the right time with the right lines?

How can a guy continue to believe they are entitled to govern a woman's body, if the only way he has access to that body is on a woman's terms?

How could this so-called double standard exist if women started to hold men to the same standards as women are held?

How is it that men are defining everything when women have all the power when it comes to sex?

The shit ya'll feminists say makes no sense. Why would you accept an oppressive gender role and protest the perceptions associated with that role instead of just throwing off the role altogether? lol That would have been like slaves choosing to be slaves as long as they were no longer called "Nigger" instead of just fighting to no longer be slaves. Again, it's ridiculous.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
245
Views
49
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…