Madame_CJSkywalker
New member
D. Morgan;c-9876611 said:Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9876605 said:D. Morgan;c-9876569 said:Damn I just read in so many words that its quite OK and expected that a person's good name should be ruined just to further an investigation for some shit that person may not have even done.
![]()
What if the accused did do it?????
Releasing a pictue or name of the accused could compell a witness to come forward to possibly help put a rapist in prison....which has happened countless of times
Or what if a witness comes forward after seeing the accused mugshot to clear his name...which has happened countless of times. Had we kept his identity anonymous until a conviction think of what that could possibly mean for the accused... The investigation would have to be reopened...Appeal made...There would have to be another trail...etc
So yes as i alluded to I'm torn
Being falsely accused of a crime as serious as rape or murder is horrible
But if our main 2 goals should be arriving at the truth and crime prevention...why put up any more road block that could potential make it harder for investigators to get to the truth
![]()
Lol
Use ur words bruh
Its not as simple or black and white as ur making it seem
We keep the accused name anonymous until a conviction there will be rapist who escape justice and more innocent men who go to jail
No question about that