Discovered on a faded scrap of papyrus, the words "Jesus said to them, 'My wife …'"

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
400 yrs after Jesus dies...this was written...

about as valid as the rest of the bible...who knows?

*waits for christians to come and shit on this*

tumblr_lols30rUm71qeiwtao1_500.gif
 
Pico Roscoe;4904345 said:
Pico Roscoe;4904345 said:
Louis Cipher;4904338 said:
Louis Cipher;4904338 said:
Pico Roscoe;4904319 said:
So jesus was fucking??!? Catholic church lauce...

why?

why would this diminish his 'message'?

I won't diminish it, I was refering to the fact they won't let women or married men hold preisthood cause they arn't "jesus like"

ahhh

'sees your point'
 
YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?

... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE
 
DROSODAMFUNNY;4904359 said:
YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?

... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE

ever heard of symbolism?

this is an example why people shouldnt take every word in the bible literally....
 
DROSODAMFUNNY;4904359 said:
YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?

... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE

um...........yeah

i think thats the point non-believers try to get across
 
Already Home_17;4904376 said:
DROSODAMFUNNY;4904359 said:
YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?

... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE

um...........yeah

i think thats the point non-believers try to get across

my point is...that the bible doesnt necessarily have to be a lie...just a guide...its the people who take it literally that would have a problem with this...

of course people do pick and choose what it is they choose to follow tho...but thats another thread
 
Louis Cipher;4904387 said:
Already Home_17;4904376 said:
DROSODAMFUNNY;4904359 said:
YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?

... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE

um...........yeah

i think thats the point non-believers try to get across

my point is...that the bible doesnt necessarily have to be a lie...just a guide...its the people who take it literally that would have a problem with this...

of course people do pick and choose what it is they choose to follow tho...but thats another thread

That's exactly what my professor said in a religion class I took. The Bible is a guide and it made sense in that respect.
 
Last edited:
Louis Cipher;4904331 said:
400 yrs after Jesus dies...this was written...

about as valid as the rest of the bible...who knows?

*waits for christians to come and shit on this*

tumblr_lols30rUm71qeiwtao1_500.gif

It was from the 4th century so probably closer to 300 years after Jesus died. That's not that big a deal considering the accepted Gospels were written around 200 years after Jesus died.

I don't think this find is all that significant really. There are a bunch of books that say things about Jesus that aren't widely accepted. This article references the Gospel of Mary Magdalene and I'm pretty sure that book suggests that Mary was either his wife or close to it.
 
The Lonious Monk;4905023 said:
Louis Cipher;4904331 said:
400 yrs after Jesus dies...this was written...

about as valid as the rest of the bible...who knows?

*waits for christians to come and shit on this*

tumblr_lols30rUm71qeiwtao1_500.gif

It was from the 4th century so probably closer to 300 years after Jesus died. That's not that big a deal considering the accepted Gospels were written around 200 years after Jesus died.

I don't think this find is all that significant really. There are a bunch of books that say things about Jesus that aren't widely accepted. This article references the Gospel of Mary Magdalene and I'm pretty sure that book suggests that Mary was either his wife or close to it.

none if its a big deal...because people that believe the bible will continue to believe...no matter what evidence is found...

 
In that culture a man was supposed to be married far past Jesus' age. That and he was a rabbi right? I think they were required to be married before they could be rabbis anyway.

And what grown ass man who achieves that level of popularity (and in Jesus' case infamy) is going to die a 33 year old virgin? U dont get that popular without all the Canaanite & Hebrew Hoes trying to twerketh thine pussy unto thee.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
82
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…