usmarin3;788415 said:
Obviously i can't speak in a definite manner because i was not there to observe these things.
How am i unqualified to speak on what i think happen, isn't that what theory and hypothesis is, a educated guess. Do you ask religious people to prove that God exists when they say they believe he controls the world? So why the fuck should i have to prove my believes in empircal evidence!
Sounds to me you caught feelings and you played yourself making assumptions about me, maybe next time your sensitive ass won't get so personal and you're the one who brought ego into it. The same people who are responsible for the progression of society have degrees, and i am more likely to listen to someone who has years of training and education over a fool who talks out his ass.
Youre not qualified to say what exists and what doesn't. You don't say "I think" or "I believe" or "I hypothesize". You say "this IS" or "this ISN'T". These are definitive terms. Concrete statements.
If a religious person tells me god exists, then I ask him what god. If he speaks of it, it exists. THE EXPANSE OF ITS POWER IS DEBATABLE.
I think a comparative analysis of our posts will prove where the emotional content is the strongest. Feelings caught indeed.
Progression of society? You just cast all of the pillars of modern society in a negative light (i.e. religion, government, politics etc). The men who lead these areas have degrees. You're confused, Toby. The earth has spiraled to damn near the brink of destruction in the past 400 years at an unprecedented rate. What progress do you speak of? The white boy who made it possible for us to have this friendly chat right now didn't have a degree. Malcolm X didn't have a degree. Neither did Gandhi. Neither did Mansa Musa.I donate food to a lot of homeless people with degrees. Your inclinations show that your rote memorization of your university curriculum has failed to teach you how to THINK.
So it seems you and your Christian brothers have more in common than you think:
A.) Your belief in things you cannot prove and disbelief in that which you can't prove.
B.) Your blind faith in the (false) superiority of intellectual/ideological hand-me-downs from your Anglo handlers.
C.) You have proven to be Christ-like in the sense that you are make-believe, you sonned yourself and just got murked.
You are a fine example of the Leatherneck tradition.
Bitch.