Becky, Brad, Jen, Todd, Ashley, And Jeremy Are Starting To Go To HBCU's

[soul rattler]

You late nigga

There are a couple predominately white HBCU's.

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. College athletics are plantations for students whether they're HBCU or PWI. They don't pay their athletes but the athletes have to go their in order to play professionally.

Do you even know how much money HBCU's make by playing just one PWI?

No shit, but I rather see that money go to a black college than a white one

I'm going to need you to clarify.

Because it sounds like you just said that you would rather a black student get fucked over by a black school then a black student getting fucked over a white school. As if one is better than the other.

 

[LUClEN]

Unrelated but I've Had a lot of white people complain to me about Affirmative action policies that benefit minorities. Every time I tell them that when it comes to college these policies hugely benefit whites because Asians are by far the most competitive for post secondary schools in terms of grades and extracurriculars they never have shit to say.

 

[Max.]

 

[Maximus Rex]

Unrelated but I've Had a lot of white people complain to me about Affirmative action policies that benefit minorities.

Also, when some dumb ass CAC tell you some fuck boy shit like that tell'em this.

Affirmative Action Is Great For White Women. So Why Do They Hate It?

The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the program benefits the women who fought against it most of all.

01/21/2016 12:22 pm ET | Updated Jun 23, 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/affirmative-action-white-women_us_56a0ef6ae4b0d8cc1098d3a5

Chloe Angyal

Front Page Editor, The Huffington Post

J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/ASSOCIATED PRESS

On Thursday, the Supreme Court narrowly upheld affirmative action in higher education admissions, protecting a landmark victory of the Civil Rights movement against yet another assault.

The face of Fisher v. Texas, Abigail Fisher, is a young, educated and white woman who sought to undo affirmative action in the erroneous belief that the system limited her chances because of her race.

But if the court had dismantled affirmative action across the nation, Fisher, and many other white women like her, would have been sorely disappointed. The fact is that white women are disproportionately likely to benefit from affirmative action policies. You’d never know that from listening to Fisher — or her demographic.

Data from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study — an annual large-scale academic survey that aims to track political attitudes — show that 66 percent of young white people between 17 and 34 describe themselves as “somewhat opposed” or “strongly opposed” to affirmative action policies in employment and admissions. Among young white women, 67 percent are against affirmative action. Among young women of color — the study polls black, Hispanic and Asian American women — only 29 percent oppose it either strongly or somewhat.

Affirmative action, when it was introduced by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, originally required entities that receive federal funding to take tangible steps “to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” In 1967, Lyndon Johnson added sex to that list.

And yet, just as most people think of Title IX as being about athletics funding (there’s a lot more to it than that), the general perception of affirmative action is that it’s “just” about race.

But affirmative action has been quite beneficial to women, and disproportionately beneficial to white women. Women are now more likely to graduate with bachelor’s degrees and attend graduate school than men are and outnumber men on many college campuses. In 1970, just 7.6 percent of physicians in America were women; in 2002, that number had risen to 25.2 percent. But — and this is a big but — those benefits are more likely to accrue to white women than they are to women of color, and that imbalance has very real effects on employment and earnings later in life. In other words: affirmative action works, and it works way better for white women than it does for all the other women in America.

But white women have made a practice of publicly objecting to affirmative action policies. As researcher Jessie McDaniel notes, since the landmark 1978 Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, in which the court ruled that race may be factored into university admissions, “the people suing universities for discrimination in the academic admissions process have been white women: Abigail Fisher; Barbara Grutter (Grutter v. Bollinger); Jennifer Gratz (Gratz v. Bollinger) and Cheryl Hopwood (Hopwood v. Texas).” Those landmark cases challenged university affirmative action programs in Michigan and Texas, respectively.

And those women are far from alone in believing that a system that’s designed to help them and has helped lots of women like them has actually robbed them of something that’s rightfully theirs — and should be dismantled as a consequence. In fact, they’re more likely than white men in their age group to object.

It’s likely most of them don’t understand how affirmative action helps them, said Jesse Rhodes, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst who recently analyzed some of the CCES data for Al Jazeera.

“For most polling,” Rhodes said, “understanding of policies is pretty limited. Citizens have a hard time connecting their experience to policies unless they’re regularly receiving pretty clear signaling from government about the benefits of those policies.” Younger citizens tend to be the least knowledgeable, Rhodes noted, simply by virtue of having less experience and less time to collect information. Guided only by the popular perception of affirmative action that it only (or mostly) benefits people of color, it’s possible that young white women see no benefit from the diversity it brings to classrooms and workplaces and view it as an obstacle to their own chances of gaining access to those spaces.

But even if young white women are aware of how affirmative action could likely benefit them — and how likely it is that they, in fact, have already benefitted from it — it’s possible these millennials view efforts to remedy the effects of racism as unnecessary, just as they view efforts to remedy the effects of sexism.

Rhodes and his co-author at Al Jazeera, Sean McElwee, write that the data suggest young white Americans, “rather than seeing racism as a persistent problem still in need of remedy... are inclined to believe America is a colorblind society and that little remains to be done to remedy past racial injustices.”

Due to him being a Latino and since Latinos are a minority in America.

He can participate and benefit from affirmative action programs.

 

[ghostdog56]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

 

[Maximus Rex]

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

Plus you would eventually get ballin' boosters, other dope ass facilities, and benefits. Also, students wouldn't have to deal with blatant racism and white supremacists getting besides themselves with fuck boy comments.

 

[ghostdog56]

You late nigga

There are a couple predominately white HBCU's.

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. College athletics are plantations for students whether they're HBCU or PWI. They don't pay their athletes but the athletes have to go their in order to play professionally.

Do you even know how much money HBCU's make by playing just one PWI?

No shit, but I rather see that money go to a black college than a white one

I'm going to need you to clarify.

Because it sounds like you just said that you would rather a black student get fucked over by a black school then a black student getting fucked over a white school. As if one is better than the other.

So what's the other option? Not going to school at all? Our black colleges are going under financially and our athletes could help since they have to go to college you might as well help out the black one i don't see why that is so hard for you to understand

 

[blackrain]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

 

[700]

I seen that at FAMU a couple years ago

I was like "Where all these crackas come from"

Crazy thing is, they get scholarships for being a minority at the school

 

[ghostdog56]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

Who said anything about it being better for them? This whole thread is about white people going to hbcu's because the school needs money they are accepting them in mass and I'm saying if our athletes went to hbcu's that would generate more income for them. Your argument is a whole different subject

 

[blackrain]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

Who said anything about it being better for them? This whole thread is about white people going to hbcu's because the school needs money they are accepting them in mass and I'm saying if our athletes went to hbcu's that would generate more income for them. Your argument is a whole different subject

Then why call their parents coons for sending them to a school where they'll possibly get the most exposure for their future career choice vs. going to a school where they won't if you know the actual benefits for them won't change? Saying "Hey, come here to a school you may not be seen as much at instead to be fucked over by the NCAA instead of there" ain't really a great pitch. I'm not against them going to HBCU's, but your pitch got to be more than that to get them there

 

[ghostdog56]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

Who said anything about it being better for them? This whole thread is about white people going to hbcu's because the school needs money they are accepting them in mass and I'm saying if our athletes went to hbcu's that would generate more income for them. Your argument is a whole different subject

Then why call their parents coons for sending them to a school where they'll possibly get the most exposure for their future career choice vs. going to a school where they won't if you know the actual benefits for them won't change? Saying "Hey, come here to a school you may not be seen as much at instead to be fucked over by the NCAA instead of there" ain't really a great pitch. I'm not against them going to HBCU's, but your pitch got to be more than that to get them there

Bruh it's the NFL if you can play they will find you. Wasn't one of the topics picks from last year's draft from like North Dakota state or some shit, if all of our top talent went to hbcu's and played against each other then them being picked high in the draft wouldn't be so far fetched

 

[2stepz_ahead]

why the white chick in the op smiling while holding up her fist....is everything a damn mockery to them

 

[The Lonious Monk]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

Who said anything about it being better for them? This whole thread is about white people going to hbcu's because the school needs money they are accepting them in mass and I'm saying if our athletes went to hbcu's that would generate more income for them. Your argument is a whole different subject

Then why call their parents coons for sending them to a school where they'll possibly get the most exposure for their future career choice vs. going to a school where they won't if you know the actual benefits for them won't change? Saying "Hey, come here to a school you may not be seen as much at instead to be fucked over by the NCAA instead of there" ain't really a great pitch. I'm not against them going to HBCU's, but your pitch got to be more than that to get them there

Bruh it's the NFL if you can play they will find you. Wasn't one of the topics picks from last year's draft from like North Dakota state or some shit, if all of our top talent went to hbcu's and played against each other then them being picked high in the draft wouldn't be so far fetched

That's true, but those players that get picked up from little known schools are usually picked up late in the draft and are paid peanuts compared to what players coming from more recognized schools make even when the talent is roughly the same.

 

[Maximus Rex]

That's true, but those players that get picked up from little known schools are usually picked up late in the draft and are paid peanuts compared to what players coming from more recognized schools make even when the talent is roughly the same.

Bruh, if 10, 15, or 20 blue chip athletes were to go to HBCUs then media and the NFL would take notice. Somebody has to brave enough to take that plunge.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

That's true, but those players that get picked up from little known schools are usually picked up late in the draft and are paid peanuts compared to what players coming from more recognized schools make even when the talent is roughly the same.

Bruh, if 10, 15, or 20 blue chip athletes were to go to HBCUs then media and the NFL would take notice. Somebody has to brave enough to take that plunge.

The problem with that thinking is that one or two or three people can't take the plunge. Damn near everyone has to take the plunge. If one or two people do it, they'll simply be written off and the media and system will just build up the next tier. The same would happen if 10, 15, or 20 players did it. There are literally hundreds of players out their with aspirations of going pro. Some are not as good as others, but lots of them are good enough to make it through if you take the better players off the table.

 

[blackrain]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

Who said anything about it being better for them? This whole thread is about white people going to hbcu's because the school needs money they are accepting them in mass and I'm saying if our athletes went to hbcu's that would generate more income for them. Your argument is a whole different subject

Then why call their parents coons for sending them to a school where they'll possibly get the most exposure for their future career choice vs. going to a school where they won't if you know the actual benefits for them won't change? Saying "Hey, come here to a school you may not be seen as much at instead to be fucked over by the NCAA instead of there" ain't really a great pitch. I'm not against them going to HBCU's, but your pitch got to be more than that to get them there

Bruh it's the NFL if you can play they will find you. Wasn't one of the topics picks from last year's draft from like North Dakota state or some shit, if all of our top talent went to hbcu's and played against each other then them being picked high in the draft wouldn't be so far fetched

So you're asking 17/18 year olds to sacrifice the level of exposure and limit the number of people who will see them perform just to be fucked over by the NCAA and their school on a smaller scale?

 

[lamontbdc]

yea you take your ass down to that engineering building at morgan and you will see a rack of white folks and punjab's.

it's fair game to me. school needs that money

 

[ghostdog56]

I blame the coon parents of these athletes who keep sending them to white schools our athletes are one of our biggest natural resources to generate cash but we keep sending them to massas plantation

Every time I see this argument being made it seems like it's ignored the NCAA would still be the NCAA and the athletes would still be getting fucked over regardless of where they go to school at. Wasn't it at Grambling where the players protested just a year ago because they caught staph infections, long ass traveling for games, and saying the school was going on about it like they gave no fucks about them?

We all know the athletes get fucked but at least use your talents to build up black colleges. Grambling wouldn't have had those problems if they had the money for better facilities which those athletes could bring

But the athletes themselves still wouldn't be better off which defeats the whole "Going to an HBCU would be better for them" thing...

Who said anything about it being better for them? This whole thread is about white people going to hbcu's because the school needs money they are accepting them in mass and I'm saying if our athletes went to hbcu's that would generate more income for them. Your argument is a whole different subject

Then why call their parents coons for sending them to a school where they'll possibly get the most exposure for their future career choice vs. going to a school where they won't if you know the actual benefits for them won't change? Saying "Hey, come here to a school you may not be seen as much at instead to be fucked over by the NCAA instead of there" ain't really a great pitch. I'm not against them going to HBCU's, but your pitch got to be more than that to get them there

Bruh it's the NFL if you can play they will find you. Wasn't one of the topics picks from last year's draft from like North Dakota state or some shit, if all of our top talent went to hbcu's and played against each other then them being picked high in the draft wouldn't be so far fetched

So you're asking 17/18 year olds to sacrifice the level of exposure and limit the number of people who will see them perform just to be fucked over by the NCAA and their school on a smaller scale?

Are we talking about should athletes get paid or the original subject of how to get more money to hbcu's?

 

[Maximus Rex]

So you're asking 17/18 year olds to sacrifice the level of exposure and limit the number of people who will see them perform just to be fucked over by the NCAA and their school on a smaller scale?

You don't seem to want to except or understand the fact that if our best athletes went to HBCU's that they would still get the exposure, especially if they played against the CAC schools and won.