Meta_Conscious
New member
She a molester.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Copper;7605523 said:BoldChild;7605399 said:Copper;7605242 said:how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?
manslaughter
which is a lesser included offense of murder
Manslaughter is a distinct crime and is not considered a lesser degree of murder. The essential distinction between the two offenses is that malice aforethought must be present for murder, whereas it must be absent for manslaughter. Manslaughter is not as serious a crime as murder. On the other hand, it is not a justifiable or excusable killing for which little or no punishment is imposed.
At Common Law, as well as under current statutes, the offense can be either voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter. The main difference between the two is that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm while involuntary manslaughter does not. Premeditation or deliberation, however, are elements of murder and not of manslaughter. Some states have abandoned the use of adjectives to describe different forms of the offense and, instead, simply divide the offense into varying degrees.
ThirdEyeFive;7605387 said:It's weird that focus is on the perpetrator and not the child who was molested.
BoldChild;7605639 said:And yes, I think some 7 year olds are capable of molestation, but like I said, in this case I think people are being disingenuous and are just using this a reason to attack someone.
BoldChild;7605610 said:Copper;7605523 said:BoldChild;7605399 said:Copper;7605242 said:how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?
manslaughter
which is a lesser included offense of murder
manslaughter is not a lesser degree of murder, it's not murder at all.
Manslaughter is a distinct crime and is not considered a lesser degree of murder. The essential distinction between the two offenses is that malice aforethought must be present for murder, whereas it must be absent for manslaughter. Manslaughter is not as serious a crime as murder. On the other hand, it is not a justifiable or excusable killing for which little or no punishment is imposed.
At Common Law, as well as under current statutes, the offense can be either voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter. The main difference between the two is that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm while involuntary manslaughter does not. Premeditation or deliberation, however, are elements of murder and not of manslaughter. Some states have abandoned the use of adjectives to describe different forms of the offense and, instead, simply divide the offense into varying degrees.
BoldChild;7605610 said:Copper;7605523 said:BoldChild;7605399 said:Copper;7605242 said:how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?
manslaughter
which is a lesser included offense of murder
manslaughter is not a lesser degree of murder, it's not murder at all.
Manslaughter is a distinct crime and is not considered a lesser degree of murder. The essential distinction between the two offenses is that malice aforethought must be present for murder, whereas it must be absent for manslaughter. Manslaughter is not as serious a crime as murder. On the other hand, it is not a justifiable or excusable killing for which little or no punishment is imposed.
At Common Law, as well as under current statutes, the offense can be either voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter. The main difference between the two is that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm while involuntary manslaughter does not. Premeditation or deliberation, however, are elements of murder and not of manslaughter. Some states have abandoned the use of adjectives to describe different forms of the offense and, instead, simply divide the offense into varying degrees.
serial offenders do typically start with "easier" targets and work from thereBiblicalAtheist ;7604020 said:There are people out there raping 80+yr old ladies.
janklow;7605886 said:serial offenders do typically start with "easier" targets and work from thereBiblicalAtheist ;7604020 said:There are people out there raping 80+yr old ladies.
BoldChild;7605164 said:ThirdEyeFive;7605146 said:idk about that. that she was doing could b classified as molestation. kids can molest other kids.
As if your average 7 year is supposed to know they're doing something sexual that can be classified as molestation.
How can it be sexual abuse if they don't view or realize the act as being sexual?
Trashboat;7605782 said:It is homicide though
some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up
Copper;7605242 said:how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?
BoldChild;7606370 said:Trashboat;7605782 said:It is homicide though
some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up
Doesn't matter either way, because 7 year olds generally aren't charged with either, because they're not considered culpable enough.
You certainly wouldn't have people digging up an adults past, finding out they shot someone without knowing what they were doing when they were 7, then proceeding to claim said person is a murderer.
Which brings us back to Cooper's original question
Copper;7605242 said:how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?
By not knowing what they're doing, they wouldn't be consider culpable enough, which is the case in general for 7 year olds who end up killing someone, and the main reason I'm saying it's ridiculous to label her amurderermolester for something she did at 7.
In most cases a 7 year old child wouldn't be labeled a murderer if they killed someone, so why is it different for her?
If you walked a 7 year old child down to the police station claiming they molested someone, the police would probably look at the person like they're crazy, and then inform CPS to open up an investigation on the parents.
Black_Samson;7606745 said:Why does the feminist movement seem to attract the most damaging people to its cause?
Like 88% of the women that are made to look like spokespersons are batshit insane and will lie on someone regardless of the damage it can cause to ones life...
Trashboat;7606551 said:BoldChild;7606370 said:Trashboat;7605782 said:It is homicide though
some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up
Doesn't matter either way, because 7 year olds generally aren't charged with either, because they're not considered culpable enough.
You certainly wouldn't have people digging up an adults past, finding out they shot someone without knowing what they were doing when they were 7, then proceeding to claim said person is a murderer.
Which brings us back to Cooper's original question
Copper;7605242 said:how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?
By not knowing what they're doing, they wouldn't be consider culpable enough, which is the case in general for 7 year olds who end up killing someone, and the main reason I'm saying it's ridiculous to label her amurderermolester for something she did at 7.
In most cases a 7 year old child wouldn't be labeled a murderer if they killed someone, so why is it different for her?
If you walked a 7 year old child down to the police station claiming they molested someone, the police would probably look at the person like they're crazy, and then inform CPS to open up an investigation on the parents.
Not necessarily. Carl Newton Mahan was tried as an adult at six years old.