Actress Lena Dunham Made Up "Rapist" Who Never Existed

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date


Copper;7605523 said:
BoldChild;7605399 said:
Copper;7605242 said:
how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?

manslaughter

which is a lesser included offense of murder

manslaughter is not a lesser degree of murder, it's not murder at all.

Manslaughter is a distinct crime and is not considered a lesser degree of murder. The essential distinction between the two offenses is that malice aforethought must be present for murder, whereas it must be absent for manslaughter. Manslaughter is not as serious a crime as murder. On the other hand, it is not a justifiable or excusable killing for which little or no punishment is imposed.

At Common Law, as well as under current statutes, the offense can be either voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter. The main difference between the two is that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm while involuntary manslaughter does not. Premeditation or deliberation, however, are elements of murder and not of manslaughter. Some states have abandoned the use of adjectives to describe different forms of the offense and, instead, simply divide the offense into varying degrees.
 
Last edited:
ThirdEyeFive;7605387 said:
It's weird that focus is on the perpetrator and not the child who was molested.

You should post some links of how her sister feels about all of this if there are any.

 
And yes, I think some 7 year olds are capable of molestation, but like I said, in this case I think people are being disingenuous and are just using this a reason to attack someone.
 
BoldChild;7605639 said:
And yes, I think some 7 year olds are capable of molestation, but like I said, in this case I think people are being disingenuous and are just using this a reason to attack someone.

I think we're all in agreement, we don't really give a shit about this broad and what happened to her.

 
BoldChild;7605610 said:
Copper;7605523 said:
BoldChild;7605399 said:
Copper;7605242 said:
how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?

manslaughter

which is a lesser included offense of murder

manslaughter is not a lesser degree of murder, it's not murder at all.

Manslaughter is a distinct crime and is not considered a lesser degree of murder. The essential distinction between the two offenses is that malice aforethought must be present for murder, whereas it must be absent for manslaughter. Manslaughter is not as serious a crime as murder. On the other hand, it is not a justifiable or excusable killing for which little or no punishment is imposed.

At Common Law, as well as under current statutes, the offense can be either voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter. The main difference between the two is that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm while involuntary manslaughter does not. Premeditation or deliberation, however, are elements of murder and not of manslaughter. Some states have abandoned the use of adjectives to describe different forms of the offense and, instead, simply divide the offense into varying degrees.

manslaughter occurs either when the defendant kills with malice aforethought (intention to kill or cause serious harm), but there are mitigating circumstances that reduce culpability, or when the defendant kills only with an intent to cause serious bodily harm. Voluntary manslaughter in some jurisdictions is a lesser included offense of murder. The traditional mitigating factor was provocation; however, others have been added in various jurisdictions.
 
BoldChild;7605610 said:
Copper;7605523 said:
BoldChild;7605399 said:
Copper;7605242 said:
how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?

manslaughter

which is a lesser included offense of murder

manslaughter is not a lesser degree of murder, it's not murder at all.

Manslaughter is a distinct crime and is not considered a lesser degree of murder. The essential distinction between the two offenses is that malice aforethought must be present for murder, whereas it must be absent for manslaughter. Manslaughter is not as serious a crime as murder. On the other hand, it is not a justifiable or excusable killing for which little or no punishment is imposed.

At Common Law, as well as under current statutes, the offense can be either voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter. The main difference between the two is that voluntary manslaughter requires an intent to kill or cause serious bodily harm while involuntary manslaughter does not. Premeditation or deliberation, however, are elements of murder and not of manslaughter. Some states have abandoned the use of adjectives to describe different forms of the offense and, instead, simply divide the offense into varying degrees.

It is homicide though

some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up
 
BoldChild;7605164 said:
ThirdEyeFive;7605146 said:
idk about that. that she was doing could b classified as molestation. kids can molest other kids.

As if your average 7 year is supposed to know they're doing something sexual that can be classified as molestation.

How can it be sexual abuse if they don't view or realize the act as being sexual?

How can someone crash a car I'd they never got they drivers license?
 
I'm wondering how they went about finding this person since I'm sure if this is true she changed the name and some stuff about him for the book..

Either way this bitch needs to go away
 


Trashboat;7605782 said:
It is homicide though

some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up

Doesn't matter either way, because 7 year olds generally aren't charged with either, because they're not considered culpable enough.

You certainly wouldn't have people digging up an adults past, finding out they shot someone without knowing what they were doing when they were 7, then proceeding to claim said person is a murderer.

Which brings us back to Cooper's original question

Copper;7605242 said:
how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?

By not knowing what they're doing, they wouldn't be consider culpable enough, which is the case in general for 7 year olds who end up killing someone, and the main reason I'm saying it's ridiculous to label her a murderer molester for something she did at 7.

In most cases a 7 year old child wouldn't be labeled a murderer if they killed someone, so why is it different for her?

If you walked a 7 year old child down to the police station claiming they molested someone, the police would probably look at the person like they're crazy, and then inform CPS to open up an investigation on the parents.
 
BoldChild;7606370 said:
Trashboat;7605782 said:
It is homicide though

some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up

Doesn't matter either way, because 7 year olds generally aren't charged with either, because they're not considered culpable enough.

You certainly wouldn't have people digging up an adults past, finding out they shot someone without knowing what they were doing when they were 7, then proceeding to claim said person is a murderer.

Which brings us back to Cooper's original question

Copper;7605242 said:
how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?

By not knowing what they're doing, they wouldn't be consider culpable enough, which is the case in general for 7 year olds who end up killing someone, and the main reason I'm saying it's ridiculous to label her a murderer molester for something she did at 7.

In most cases a 7 year old child wouldn't be labeled a murderer if they killed someone, so why is it different for her?

If you walked a 7 year old child down to the police station claiming they molested someone, the police would probably look at the person like they're crazy, and then inform CPS to open up an investigation on the parents.

Not necessarily. Carl Newton Mahan was tried as an adult at six years old.
 
So yall dont remember being 7? Not sure wtf the parents were doing or who she is, but if those alegations about her are true than shes obviously ripe for a shrink...or any other form of supervision...

its some disturbing shit.
 
Black_Samson;7606745 said:
Why does the feminist movement seem to attract the most damaging people to its cause?

Like 88% of the women that are made to look like spokespersons are batshit insane and will lie on someone regardless of the damage it can cause to ones life...

My guess is most who tend to adopt the ideology are in arts disciplines and are not really persuaded with any legitimate evidence. It is more of an indoctrination. Hence the perpetuation of myths like women being paid 70 cents for every dollar men make when doing the same job. Those who are convinced and dedicate themselves to the cause are those who do not have the ability to see the flaws in the reasoning, which leads to the absurdity we see. In short lunacy begets lunacy.

 
Trashboat;7606551 said:
BoldChild;7606370 said:
Trashboat;7605782 said:
It is homicide though

some people consider the terms interchangeable so it's understandable he'd get that mixed up

Doesn't matter either way, because 7 year olds generally aren't charged with either, because they're not considered culpable enough.

You certainly wouldn't have people digging up an adults past, finding out they shot someone without knowing what they were doing when they were 7, then proceeding to claim said person is a murderer.

Which brings us back to Cooper's original question

Copper;7605242 said:
how can a kid murder someone if they dont know that their doing?

By not knowing what they're doing, they wouldn't be consider culpable enough, which is the case in general for 7 year olds who end up killing someone, and the main reason I'm saying it's ridiculous to label her a murderer molester for something she did at 7.

In most cases a 7 year old child wouldn't be labeled a murderer if they killed someone, so why is it different for her?

If you walked a 7 year old child down to the police station claiming they molested someone, the police would probably look at the person like they're crazy, and then inform CPS to open up an investigation on the parents.

Not necessarily. Carl Newton Mahan was tried as an adult at six years old.

I said in most cases.

And that case happens back in the 1920's and seemed to have caused a big uoroar.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
72
Views
132
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…