Wrestlemania 32

[Dupac]

Damn a whole new thread for Mania??

No hate

 

[infamous114]

 

[Already Home_17]

 

[KillaCham]

Damn a whole new thread for Mania??

No hate

Lol I'm gonna merge it soon. Don't want to take away from the Fast Lane discussion yet though.

 

[jono]

Don't merge it until after Wrestlemania. You gotta let it ride.

 

[Dupac]

nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers

 

[KillaCham]

nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers

Why did you notice that?? Lmaoooooo

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers

Lol wut?

 

[Chi-Town Bully]

nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers

That nh cant save this post

 

[dalyricalbandit]

nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers

 

[Dupac]

I was just laughing at how one nigga is shirtless in all the pics, but taker technically still has a shirt on... Man I can't believe i posted that shit

 

[silverfoxx]

I was just laughing at how one nigga is shirtless in all the pics, but taker technically still has a shirt on... Man I can't believe i posted that shit

Your avi not helping your case bruh

 

[TheBoyRo]

I'm happy this thread is called wr wrestlemania 32 and not just plain old wrestlemania. Smh at wwe stopping with the numbers

 

[Dupac]

I was just laughing at how one nigga is shirtless in all the pics, but taker technically still has a shirt on... Man I can't believe i posted that shit

Your avi not helping your case bruh

lol whatever... none of yall can unsee it either now.... smh

 

[KillaCham]

I'm curious to see how people who don't like the card right now, more specifically Shane/Taker, would book WrestleMania differently.

 

[5th Letter]

I'm curious to see how people who don't like the card right now, more specifically Shane/Taker, would book WrestleMania differently.

Triple H vs Reigns is good, they've been building towards this match since 2014, so it makes sense.

Ambrose vs Lesnar- can't wait!!!!!

Undertaker vs Shane McMahon is a waste of the Undertaker, he doesn't have that many matches left in him and he can no longer carry a match and Shane can't physically bump like he used to given his age and the fact that he hasn't wrestled since 2006. Part timer vs part timer accomplishes nothing long term, at least Ambrose and Reigns two active guys are getting a rub by being involved with guys like HHH and Brock. You want to create new stars and I feel that a younger talent could've benefitted more by being in this spot.

They knew Cena was going to miss this WM, so my plan would've been to build up Kevin Owens and have him do a bunch of vignettes (think of Austin's vignettes from 1996 calling out Bret Hart leading up to SS) then Taker appears and answers Owens months of taunting by accepting his challenge. Owens gets a chance to mix it up with a guy like Taker.

Option number 2 the unpopular option. Sheamus. We really do not want to see Taker vs Sheamus, but there has been many feuds over the course of the past years that we've initially didn't want to see but the WWE did a good job booking the storyline and it became interesting. Sheamus is the most accomplished guy on the roster that Taker has never faced. He was coming off a solid WWE World Title run, instead of killing his momentum, they could've kept building him up even after he lost the belt to Reigns.

Those are two realistic options.

 

[Already Home_17]

it seems like wwe wants the IC title defended at WM. there's no need for taker or brock to challenge for that title.

owens vs taker sounds like a great feud though, especially if biker taker was still around

their promos would be etherous

 

[Idiopathic Joker]

We should all wait and see how this taker vs Shane match plays out

 

[Peezy_Jenkins]

the idea of owens calling out taker is really good tho

 

[Max.]

nh but you can see the chest muscles of all the losers