I was listening to Cheap Heat, Rosenberg and Shoemaker had an interesting discussion on why The Rock got far more screen time for WM than Steve Austin.
It got me to thinking about whether we should read anything into all the hoopla made over the Rock's involvment as opposed to Austin's or is it being overly smarky to wonder why this is?
It could be that Rock got more time because he was advertised but then the question becomes why didnt they advertise Austin?
While I'm personally not bothered by this I wonder if anyone else is. Does it bother you that Rock seems to get higher billing than Steve Austin?
Even going back to the recent WM they were both involved in (27, 30) Rock got more screen time and only one other time (27) was Austin even announced before the event (he was the referee for Michael Cole vs Jerry Lawler...which is obviously a shit job).
27 can be overlooked as it was Rock's "return" to Wrestlemania and it jumped off his feud with Cena but WM 30 and 32 have left me interested in how they value the two guys.
THOUGHTS?