lol Jaded my man im short on time these days. That other thread is a dead hustle. I thought I answered your question already anyway. The bottom line is the origin of man cannot be explained through evolite perspective. Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory. But yall can believe whatever theFACK u wanna believe like Hodge twins.
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It may not be comparable in every aspect, but unless you just being stupid you can see that God has left similar evidences like that of His existence. Not that you can detect Him on your own, bruh. That you might believe in His son and that He exist.
God character is righteous and comparable to none else.
God character is righteous and comparable to none else.
alissowack
New member
Jaded Righteousness;4362609 said:^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.
The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.
...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.
Last edited:
alissowack
New member
alissowack;4363439 said:Jaded Righteousness;4362609 said:^^^ Thinking for yourself means that you test things out before you blindly believe something. If you follow something without evidence or concrete proof of whatever you're following actually being true, then you don't really know; you're just assuming with blind faith and you're not thinking for yourself.
The act of thinking for yourself isn't always based on trying to test something. What make it possible for anyone to think...period (and I don't mean in respect to having a brain)? What liberty do we have in deciding whether or not we can or not think? You're obsessed with this evidence thing. It's almost as if to say...the evidence, when shown, will explain itself; that it is a deity in itself. The evidence is still subjected to what we perceive it to be.
...and I'm not a troll. I'm a short bus specialist.
Somewhere I went wrong and quoted myself. Is it possible to erase this?
Last edited:
solid analysis;4362661 said:Plus more and more scientists are starting to support the ID theory.
link? source? something?
ChromaStoned
New member
would it really though? maybe it would want to play god
redhandedbandit
New member
is there was really god?
