Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
West Brooklyn ;4984334 said:I come here to debate. I go to GnS for casual convo (unless of course a debate worthy thread is made).
What would you like to converse about?
alissowack;4987158 said:West Brooklyn ;4984334 said:I come here to debate. I go to GnS for casual convo (unless of course a debate worthy thread is made).
What would you like to converse about?
Maybe if you saw the point I was making, you would see that this is exactly what you want. I am making an argument, but you think I just want to "talk". I at least try sometimes to read people's post so I don't overlook things. Not always perfect.
alissowack;4983326 said:not every aspect of life is about presenting an argument or debate.
West Brooklyn ;4988364 said:alissowack;4987158 said:West Brooklyn ;4984334 said:I come here to debate. I go to GnS for casual convo (unless of course a debate worthy thread is made).
What would you like to converse about?
Maybe if you saw the point I was making, you would see that this is exactly what you want. I am making an argument, but you think I just want to "talk". I at least try sometimes to read people's post so I don't overlook things. Not always perfect.
You have no argument I have not addressed already unless you're trying to say something else; you'd have to let me know what that is. To my understanding, this is/was your last argument:
alissowack;4983326 said:not every aspect of life is about presenting an argument or debate.
This is true but it does not change the fact that I am a reasonable and logical person, nor does it have anything to do with what we were originally talking about which is God being outside time and interfering with our universe, which is illogical and unreasonable. It's not really about arguments or debates; you and I can have either or to discuss it but when it comes down to it, it's pretty clear cut. Like for instance, is a square circle possible? We can go on for days debating this but at it's root, it's illogical and unreasonable. It has nothing to do with love, pain, sadness, hate, or anger from family or strangers.
If you want to exit this debate that we were both willing to continue, and you were perfectly okay with before you had nothing else to run on, feel free to at any time but don't try to play victim and flip flop around a bunch of B.S.
If you want to express your feelings without any opposing views, don't talk to anybody; keep your thoughts to yourself or at least write them down somewhere at home. Nobody's forcing you to debate here.
If you do want to debate, pick an argument and stay with it.
FuriousOne;4977984 said:alissowack;4977116 said:FuriousOne;4975885 said:alissowack;4975828 said:Why would God need to operate the way we operate in order to be valid? What is so "convenient" about a deity that is an authority over everything? What position would anybody be in to "test" this? If anything, people would avoid even coming up with this. It requires that we sacrifice more than just our intelligence. What I'm getting from this is you don't want to go any further. The thing about this concept is the issue isn't about right or wrong. It's about life or death (I'm not getting apocalyptic on you). It's one thing to be right or wrong and live to tell about it and another to be dead and we can be neither one. We will experience death for ourselves one day and we won't be in a position to make valid to anybody alive what we understood.
Survival isn't about the individual. It's about survival of the organism. So life and death and inconsequential other then species death. What add to the specious can only be beneficial when used for benefit. If what we offer is used for benefit, then the memories of our actions are imprinted in the further actives of the species no matter how small. The continuation of working processes is proof that the accumulation of like activities by other members of the species adds overall value to general survival. You're the one thinking in individual terms. The sun acts nothing like us and doesn't require our input to exist yet it can be observed and impacts other objects such as earths rotation and gravity. It does affect us directly in way of energy and creation from previous suns. You're also telling me that we can't perceive God until we sacrifice (death?). What evidence do you have that our multiple parts will trans-mutate into a form (other then energy consumed by other forms or broken down into elements) that's limited and contained by this universe which can interact with God beyond intelligence (which only functions while active and preserved via glyphs and DNA matter).
Human interaction is only in the manner of observing what is present and what causes impact through interaction on the smallest level even if it's just energy emissions rather then matter and gravity. I'm just wondering where you are getting these theories from if you haven't witnessed any presentations or been presented with any evidence others can observe. How can something live outside of space time and interact with space time with no effect other the magic? You're postulating your own sudo theories and explanation that God exists with no need of explanation or possibility of explanation. Sounds like you've set limits on yourself. Evidence isn't about right or wrong because it stands on it's own. You're interpretation is your own but others can have input and show alternative and a more sound understanding when it's presented. I God requiring need to "operate" implies interaction and residual effects would be left if that God chose to "operate" in this universe. There is also the aspect that operation is still bound to the universe, and we aren't going beyond our means to do so.
Well, when we die, we die alone so that would make it "individual". What we are doing to preserve life is totally different from that. You treat my approach to this as if I am offering death as a method of testing. I'm not expecting you to die just so you can find out. I'm saying that when we die, we won't have a choice whether we want to know or not. We won't even have the liberty of saying "Ha, I told you so!!!"
The thing about questioning an individual is that we don't simply as question just so we know. We question their authority, their credibility, their integrity and such in the things we question an individual about. You could question me and find me a fraud. But, that doesn't get rid of the possibility of God Existence. It just means you figured me out...that's all. I think people take more pride in implanting doubt in great minds (my mind is not that great however) than just whether they sincerely have any commitment to what they understand. The issue of God's Existence will still be on the table whether people treat it as the main course or that disposable paper napkin.
I only question the evidence. Scientific discoveries have come about in the most precarious manner but that evidence was still accurate and could have been discovered in more acceptable ways. Humans put a negative spin on the usage of a discoveries like creating a bomb vs self sustaining energy. My problem is, people are the ones putting forward the question of God. The question wouldn't exist without mans input in the first place. So people can also dismiss the question of God as a probable cause of things especially when we eliminate the examples that people use for Gods existence. We can also question the legitimate characteristics of a God existing in this universe or the possibility of anything existing outside of it, if there is an outside. We may die alone but we spread our genes and knowledge so parts of us live on or at least our contribution whether active or passive still affected others around us. I know that animals and bacteria consume us which is the true form of reincarnation of energy (or transfer). Beyond that, our bodies break down to base elements and energy. Tell me how our conscientiousness can survive death without a functioning brain?
You're telling me that we can't know but yet you seem to know that God exist outside space-time and you also put forward the possibility that our bodies can do something miraculous post death. We can come to conclusions without the input of others using separate tools and interacting with evidence differently while arriving at a similar conclusion. We don't require the authority of others because what we test exist to us all. Some things depend on your capabilities and resources but it's not impossible for one to come to their own conclusions separate from others and have others test their theories with rigorous examination. Discovery doesn't exist in a bubble where know one can employ their own tests. A reproducible effect verified and tested by independent parties allows evidence to stand on it's own. The question of God has artificially been prolonged through efforts to suppress questions using various means.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20100816/lead/lead9.htmlJamaica Gleaner News;4989558 said:Rastafarianism is a rather inchoate movement, something which we hope a serious conference of scholarship about Rastafari will have the courage and honesty to explore. One of its principal proponents, Mutabaruka, is an atheist.