Gold_Certificate
New member
So you're saying that because there is no proof that Godzilla is controlling your every action and desire, the claim that he is controlling you is false?CopperKing;5374273 said:Gold_Certificate;5374188 said:So humans are to be agnostic when it comes to any one of the infinitely-many conceivable concepts that other humans can create?CopperKing;5374118 said:Gold_Certificate;5374075 said:Sure they are yo.CopperKing;5373849 said:I dont think the human race is advanced enough to be saying for a fact if omnipotent beings exist or not....we still rage war against one another over money and religion
The only thing supporting the claim that "supernatural" beings exist is the claim that "supernatural" beings exist.
If humans applied such circular reasoning to everything, they'd have to be agnostic about an infinite number of claims that others come up with.
If ur not certain of a certain things theres nothing wrong with saying ur not certain..theres something wise in being agnostic instead of feigning proof of non existence
If I say "Godzilla exists and he rules the world from the shadows, controlling your every action and desire; and you can't prove he doesn't.", then is it unwise to rule out such a claim?
If anything, it's wise to rule out fantastical claims lacking in any form of proof or provability.
Horrible example... my actions prove that my actions are only being controlled by me
Last edited: