solid analysis;1653823 said:
There was an underground city and it is dated OVER 10,000 years ago. That in itself puts humans at a time where it was thought not to be. Anyway this underground city housed 30,000 people. Not just people but livestock as well. This had all you need to live life, restrooms, bedrooms etc stuff like that.
Anyway, it was said as a "myth" at first that a "god" came to the people and told them to build an underground city for safety and I think it was these "aliens" that helped build as well. It was supposed to be use for a 'safe haven' because there were aerial battles and shit, something like that. So the city would go hide for a while, to hide from these "aliens". It was all a myth, come to find out the city exists and it was found by accident.
Of course this is used as an AAT (ancient alien theory) not in a bible sense, so that's where the connection lies.
Last edited:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^and how the fuck did they bulid that shit, how da fuck they carefullyy move all that stone without caving in somebody got teach this shit right ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ good post somebody watches the history channel
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
Haha @ Vibe pulling out information he became aware of last Thursday.
I remember someone when I used to argue with people using AAT evidence.
I remember someone when I used to argue with people using AAT evidence.
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
dholt23;1653907 said:
You could build that with ancient tools in about 14 years. Niggas moved mountains 100s of miles back then and lifted 20 ton blocks. I don't think it's absolute proof that alien technology was involved.
Slave Power could get alot of shit done.
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
VIBE86;1653899 said:
The numbers are steadily increasing in the last 5 years in terms of "Experts" believing the AAT to be credible. In a poll of 50,000 archaeologists and college professors I believe it was 14% in a 2009 poll voted that the AAT was the most reasonable explanation for ancient mysteries. The same poll with the all but two of same voters in 2005 was only at 2 something %.
Last edited:
Ancient artifact, considered to be a "space suit".
Another, showing a full head gear with something inside it's mouth (breathing apparatus)
Another suit
^^ different cultures/people/groups with the same ideas. Suits, helmet and some type of breathing apparatus. These people didn't cross each other, how is it they know something like this? There's TONS of stuff like this. Texts speak of these GODS from the stars, in balls of fire and smoke (spaceships)
Another, showing a full head gear with something inside it's mouth (breathing apparatus)
Another suit
^^ different cultures/people/groups with the same ideas. Suits, helmet and some type of breathing apparatus. These people didn't cross each other, how is it they know something like this? There's TONS of stuff like this. Texts speak of these GODS from the stars, in balls of fire and smoke (spaceships)
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;1653962 said:
Try 400 ton blocks, in Boliva in Tiwanaku shit weighed 400 tons. Not even our technology today can lift that. Remember, they tried to make their own make shift pullies and shit and it all failed. I have no idea how to explain moving 400 ton blocks, 200 ton blocks let alone 2 tons blocks, 2 tons is 4,000 pounds right? That's a shit load of weight.
Last edited:
VIBE86;1653861 said:
The point is if there is no other list like it, it goes to show that 1) the list given in the Bible remains unique in and of itself, & 2) that men and all the things they could write about just don't take the time to sit there and come up with detailed lists of things like that.
And even if you did find another list, the question then becomes, will it prove to be anywhere near as highly accurate as the account given in the Bible? Whether yes or no, the Bible still wins.
So....just because you choose to be a skeptic that does not make the account given in the book of Genesis false.
VIBE86;1653861 said:
If the book was written by Enoch and the earliest mention of the book dates back to 300BC then we have a major problem. That would mean that the book was written before the global flood, which would mean it would have had to survive that and that would make it the oldest piece of scripture known to man, predating even the writings of Moses who wrote the Torah (Genesis - Deuteronomy). And since there is no mention of the book before 300BC that would mean that the book mysteriously went 'missing' allllll those years, then popped up out of nowhere...In addition to God promising His word would not disappear Jesus stated "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled" (Matthew 5:17-18). but the 'book of Enoch' went AWOL all the way until a few centuries before the church was established. That is not a trait that the writings of God have. I think i can rest my case on these points alone.
VIBE86;1653861 said:
Nope, i didn't know that...but i sincerely don't think there's a need to know much else about the book given the circumstances if you know what i'm saying. And the part you brought up is in Chapter 6 of 'the book of Enoch' which you left out the mentioning of wives...it says "And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men " directly contradicting the words of Jesus who said '"For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven" (Mark 12:25). I thought you said the book of Enoch coincides with the Bible.
Last edited:
solid analysis;1654062 said:Nope, i didn't know that...but i sincerely don't think there's a need to know much else about the book given the circumstances if you know what i'm saying. And the part you brought up is in Chapter 6 of 'the book of Enoch' which you left out the mentioning of wives...it says "And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men " directly contradicting the words of Jesus who said '"For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven" (Mark 12:25). I thought you said the book of Enoch coincides with the Bible.
Right, this is why they were called "fallen angels" and pretty much thrown out of heaven.
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
Lol @ Dude from Ancient Aliens, he went from hella pale in season one to fluctuating between orange and red the entire season two. Spray on tans aint whats good.
And yea, them rocks in Bolivia from what I've read have no one explaining how it happened with any backup. A few authors claim they were large quarrys and the rocks were carved and then the grounds rocks were dug up and transferred and grass and shrubs were placed in the soil around it, but I mean come on now.
This board needs an ancient alien theory thread. I could fill that bitch up with 200 pages of information.
The Hollow Earth theory could be an explanation if someone wants to take the "earliest humans were far advanced and took refuge between the Earths multiple inner layers" approach and other humans remained up top. If someone doesn't want to believe in ET's. But the more and more you look into it...It's sometimes hard to argue against it. Alot of questions it leaves, but alot of things can back it.
And yea, them rocks in Bolivia from what I've read have no one explaining how it happened with any backup. A few authors claim they were large quarrys and the rocks were carved and then the grounds rocks were dug up and transferred and grass and shrubs were placed in the soil around it, but I mean come on now.
This board needs an ancient alien theory thread. I could fill that bitch up with 200 pages of information.
The Hollow Earth theory could be an explanation if someone wants to take the "earliest humans were far advanced and took refuge between the Earths multiple inner layers" approach and other humans remained up top. If someone doesn't want to believe in ET's. But the more and more you look into it...It's sometimes hard to argue against it. Alot of questions it leaves, but alot of things can back it.
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun
New member
solid analysis;1654062 said:
The dead sea scrolls are like it.
READ YOUR BIBLE ALERT! : Using Biblical Genealogy the flood was 1695 days after creation. Long before 300BC.
Or common sense Alert! A flood isn't going to destroy things buried in sealed pottery written on clay tablets.
Again wrong, the Harrapa texts are the oldest known to man. They are estimated to have been done about 3700 B.C.
Even the Sumerian texts are from 3500BC
So really try again. 300 BC....? Really lmao?
Vibe already got at the other stuff.
Last edited:
