was Noah the son of extraterrestrials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
If Noah was the son of extraterrestrials we would all be extraterrestrials, being that everybody who has ever lived after the flood came from Noah and his sons.
 
Last edited:
BiblicalAtheist;1651711 said:
791acdf2.gif

_____________

and this is most compelling argument yet :)

cuz everything else posted in opposition to the story of Noah is nothing more than a thesis

VIBE86;1652154 said:
Really? How do you know this? Who's to say that? Did God say this? Because it's very well known the bible was taken apart to only satisfy certain people for their thoughts/beliefs. Who's to say that none of the lost scriptures are legit? They all coincide with the bible, even the book of Enoch does. I haven't found any "contradictions" yet.
Nope, God promised everybody that his word would never perish and that it abides forever. Now if you don't believe that, then it's understandable how you can believe there in such things as 'lost scriptures'. And nope, sry, the Book of Enoch certainly doesn't coincide with the rest of the Bible on several critical points...but most who only casually read the Bible, failing to exercise due diligence, also fail at catching those points.
 
Last edited:
solid analysis;1653005 said:
Nope, God promised everybody that his word would never perish and that it abides forever. Now if you don't believe that, then it's understandable how you can believe there in such things as 'lost scriptures'. And nope, sry, the Book of Enoch certainly doesn't coincide with the rest of the Bible on several critical points...but most who only casually read the Bible, failing to exercise due diligence, also fail at catching those points.

Then explain. The Book of Enoch from my readings fit the bible. I haven't read ALL the lost books.

You just said, "his word would never perish and abides forever", these are lost scriptures that were hidden away for one hell of a long time, I consider that not perishing and lasting forever. If you don't then what does what you just said mean to you? The bible does say Enoch was taken up, right? He never did die, right? Book of Enoch backs that up, no?

Anyways, explain, I'm very much interested right now...
 
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;1652859 said:
If Noah was the son of extraterrestrials we would all be extraterrestrials, being that everybody who has ever lived after the flood came from Noah and his sons.

So basically... What race was Noah? And where did white and asian people come from if this story happened less than 6,000 years ago?
 
Last edited:
Chike;1653050 said:
So basically... What race was Noah? And where did white and asian people come from if this story happened less than 6,000 years ago?

I don't know what race Noah was. A quick google search can tell you who shem, ham, and japheth are the fathers of.
 
Last edited:
VIBE86;1653036 said:
Then explain. The Book of Enoch from my readings fit the bible. I haven't read ALL the lost books.

You just said, "his word would never perish and abides forever", these are lost scriptures that were hidden away for one hell of a long time, I consider that not perishing and lasting forever. If you don't then what does what you just said mean to you? The bible does say Enoch was taken up, right? He never did die, right? Book of Enoch backs that up, no?

Anyways, explain, I'm very much interested right now...

You really willing to believe a part of the word of God got lost? Every single one of prior revelations was/is easily accessible by many many people. No God would not allow several parts, or even one part of the Gospel or any part of His word, that He intentionally revealed unto all of mankind, to become lost and then surface up hundreds of years later. Please name one scripture known and accepted to be from God by God's people, that was revealed in the same nature.

That the book of Enoch backs up one point made in the Bible doesn't mean it automatically gets off the hook for failing on all the other points that the unknown writer missed.

I'll be honest, i reallly don't feel like bringing out the guns and going in on the book of Enoch and crushing it to oblivion at the moment...it would be like beating a dead horse. Others have already done so.
 
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;1653117 said:
I don't know what race Noah was. A quick google search can tell you who shem, ham, and japheth are the fathers of.

DoU surely u know the Bible is the only book in the world that gives an account of how all the different nationalities came about...
 
Last edited:
its obvoius to me that aliens were here a long time, ask native aericans elders they got all the 411 from the sky people, and noah was ark is creation story
 
Last edited:
dholt23;1653164 said:
its obvoius to me that aliens were here a long time, ask native a,ericans helders they got all the 411 from the sky people, and noah was ark is creation story

the natives also did shrooms, no?
 
Last edited:
solid analysis;1653149 said:
You really willing to believe a part of the word of God got lost? Every single one of prior revelations was/is easily accessible by many many people. No God would not allow several parts, or even one part of the Gospel or any part of His word, that He intentionally revealed unto all of mankind, to become lost and then surface up hundreds of years later. Please name one scripture known and accepted to be from God by God's people, that was revealed in the same nature.

That the book of Enoch backs up one point made in the Bible doesn't mean it automatically gets off the hook for failing on all the other points that the unknown writer missed.

I'll be honest, i reallly don't feel like bringing out the guns and going in on the book of Enoch and crushing it to oblivion at the moment...it would be like beating a dead horse. Others have already done so.

Not done so that I've seen, but hey take your time I guess...

Also, yes, I do think that anything can be changed, taken from and added to in the bible.
 
Last edited:
solid analysis;1653158 said:
DoU surely u know the Bible is the only book in the world that gives an account of how all the different nationalities came about...

And that's your answer to nationalities and languages? The Tower of Babel? Really?
 
Last edited:
solid analysis;1653149 said:
You really willing to believe a part of the word of God got lost? Every single one of prior revelations was/is easily accessible by many many people. No God would not allow several parts, or even one part of the Gospel or any part of His word, that He intentionally revealed unto all of mankind, to become lost and then surface up hundreds of years later. Please name one scripture known and accepted to be from God by God's people, that was revealed in the same nature.

That the book of Enoch backs up one point made in the Bible doesn't mean it automatically gets off the hook for failing on all the other points that the unknown writer missed.

I'll be honest, i reallly don't feel like bringing out the guns and going in on the book of Enoch and crushing it to oblivion at the moment...it would be like beating a dead horse. Others have already done so.

They weren't lost. When Constantine ordered them to be destroyed a shitload of people deemed them too important to destroy and buried them. That's not lost, it's preserving it for the future.
 
Last edited:
ThaChozenWun;1653326 said:
They weren't lost. When Constantine ordered them to be destroyed a shitload of people deemed them too important to destroy and buried them. That's not lost, it's preserving it for the future.

ziiiing

sounds preserved to me.

also the trinity doctrine started there too, ooooh that's a good one, the trinity started at the Council of Nicea if I'm not mistaken. All over one saying right? "There was when he was not" flamed the whole Jesus is God, God is Jesus thing. LOL If it wasn't known then and clear that Jesus was God, then how the hell do we know THEY didn't change it? Because they did try to decide what books were in AND out.
 
Last edited:
solid analysis;1653173 said:
the natives also did shrooms, no?

they got peroids under water thats said to be over 10,000 yearls old, they got under ground cities in that held up to 30,00 people, who you think bulid that shit
 
Last edited:
VIBE86;1653315 said:
And that's your answer to nationalities and languages? The Tower of Babel? Really?
Please show me in ancient literature a more complete list of the origin of all the worlds nations than the list given in Genesis 10.

ThaChozenWun;1653326 said:
They weren't lost. When Constantine ordered them to be destroyed a shitload of people deemed them too important to destroy and buried them. That's not lost, it's preserving it for the future.
Sry, NOPE. *sigh* That's not why people call them 'lost' gospels. And anyway, Constantine reigned around what, 300AD. So where was the book before then?
 
Last edited:
VIBE86;1653351 said:
ziiiing

sounds preserved to me.

also the trinity doctrine started there too, ooooh that's a good one, the trinity started at the Council of Nicea if I'm not mistaken. All over one saying right? "There was when he was not" flamed the whole Jesus is God, God is Jesus thing. LOL If it wasn't known then and clear that Jesus was God, then how the hell do we know THEY didn't change it? Because they did try to decide what books were in AND out.
Scholars date the earliest fragments of the book of Enoch to be from 300BC. Assuming this is true, where was the book before then?
 
Last edited:
dholt23;1653697 said:
they got peroids under water thats said to be over 10,000 yearls old, they got under ground cities in that held up to 30,00 people, who you think bulid that shit

So the existence of under ground cities is being used as proof of extraterrestrials...i don't see the connection
 
Last edited:
solid analysis;1653799 said:
Please show me in ancient literature a more complete list of the origin of all the worlds nations than the list given in Genesis 10.

So you think that since they talk about their family tree and that it repopulated the world, then it must be true? What if other texts were found to say that theirs did, or another culture did, what would you say then? Just because they list a family tree doesn't mean anything.

solid analysis;1653814 said:
Scholars date the earliest fragments of the book of Enoch to be from 300BC. Assuming this is true, where was the book before then?

Who knows where? I don't, you don't, scientists don't. Only the holder of the book could ever know and they're all long gone. You don't think it being dated to 300BC is proof enough? Do you think it's duck tales? Because it coincides with ancient people as well, do you know that? The part where it talks about the knowledge being shared with the humans and these "angels" or what these ancients called them then, "GODS" mated with them as well. So not only do we have The BOOK of ENOCH saying they mated with people on earth AND shared info with them about the stars, building etc, the ancients say the SAME exact thing. So it's written in the book of Enoch and told by people here on earth, same shit bro. Insane right? They were called GODS though, not angels though. Either way, it's very crazy. And Book of Enoch is proof enough because it has evidence to back it up by other cultures telling the same exact stories.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
78
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…