Buehrle sounds retarded. You're a big animal rights activist and
a avid hunter? No. That does not compute. You know who calls bullshit on that "well hunting is sport, tradition, and for population control" argument hunters use?
ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS.
That said, some of ya'll niggas trippin.
cobbland;2092947 said:
The end result in both cases is a dead animal. Why is one more villified than the other?
Game hunters indeed have little room to talk, but its easy to see why one is more vilified.
People don't keep deer as pets. Duh. People
love dogs in this country. No-one give a fuck about deer like that.
bow to royalty;2093025 said:
Deer hunting is allowed to keep the population in check.
Okay, I've seen Ktulu and other parroting this line for a few pages and.....is basically a bullshit excuse invented by hunters. You know what's really good at keeping an ecosystem's population in check? Nature.
There are other ways to deal with this problem, but none of them are as fun as going all Killzone 3 on a fleeing animal.
bigrizz;2093052 said:
put on display in a zoo. But nobody says shit and peta aint running to rescue them.
wrong PETA hates zoos and circuses too nigga
KTULU IS BACK;2093297 said:
I said this about Michael Jackson and yall blacks got mad.
If you said that post-death, you were fucking with MJ's Hendrix-in-'71 swag and the "We black people forgive you for being nuts" parade.
If you said that pre-death, MJ stans. They come in every color.
bigrizz;2093052 said:
So what ya'll think happens to dogs from dog tracks?
indeed, abuse of greyhounds is systematic and awful
[video=youtube;ITFVT0k_P5s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITFVT0k_P5s[/video]
........but you can't be outraged by that and be cool with what Vick did
shit don't work that way, b
it's one or the other
KTULU IS BACK;2093826 said:
and thus, racists
they also glorify selling drugs, shooting black people over drug sales, and doing drugs while shooting black people
More socially conscious than Biggie ever was.
KTULU IS BACK;2098530 said:
You can kill an animal in a humane manner and eat it.
Yeah well, PETA disagrees.
These are the people that think its "cruel" to boil a lobster.
Maalik;2097158 said:
Dogs are animals. In other portions of the world, they're no different than Cows or Chickens or Sheep. Over here....we consider them pets.
Correct. And that's why OUR LAWS AND CULTURE frown on killing/maiming dogs. Slaughtering cows in India causes deadly riots and will get you locked the fuck up over there.
I hate when ya'll niggas try to act like YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY Vick catches hate. Nigga killed dogs in a country that loves dogs. Simple as that. The hypocrisy of society's treatment of animals doesn't EXCUSE the nonsense Vick was on. Racists do they thing as always, but if you think Favre would get a pass for pleading guilty to the shit Vick did, you're nuts. He'd have a better chance in the courts and media because he's white, but that shit only carries you so far.
KTULU IS BACK;2098596 said:
Maalik would have a point if hunters collected deer, threw them in pools, and drown them to death instead of shooting them in the heart.
.............you really think some of these drunk redneck hunters never decide to "have some fun" with their prey?
oh of course not, they're all responsible model sportsmen n shit
KTULU IS BACK;2098967 said:
This entire thread is black posters raging against white people in general. Look how many "SMH AT WHITE PEOPLE" posts there are.
this is true, I sympathize with you
KTULU IS BACK;2098596 said:
Like I said, blacks are taught to defend black criminals, no matter whether they really broke the law or not. Gamblers (Vick), murderers (OJ), tax cheats (Nas). Doesn't matter to black people.
oh wait, satirical trolling or not you sound exactly like some racist asshole from a BreitBart story comment
sympathy withdrawn. FUCC U CRACKA
Maalik;2100970 said:
Shooting a deer in the skull with a shotgun from 40 feet away isn't humane.
but a clean headshot IS more humane that being killed via drowning, strangulation, bludgeoning, or electrocution.
If you were choosing your method of execution, and the choices were:
Drowning
Strangled
Beaten
Electrocuted
Bullet to head
........YOU WOULD CHOOSE THE BULLET TO THE HEAD BECAUSE ITS MORE HUMANE AND CAUSES THE LEAST AMOUNT OF SUFFERING.
KTULU IS BACK;2101845 said:
First of all, controlling the population of wildlife so they don't destroy all the available resources and then starve completely to death is humane.
again, this is not even close to being the real reason people hunt
"hey Jimmy, you ready to help control the wildlife population this weekend?"
"damn right! I can't wait to help those deer not destroy all the available resources and then starve completely to death!"
this isn't the oil spill episode of Futurama, ain't nobody bussin they guns for the
ecosystem