5 Grand;c-10043259 said:Inglewood_B;c-10043229 said:5 Grand;c-10043052 said:grYmes;c-10042649 said:YOU the one who gotta think. Not every QB thats won a Super Bowl is instantly a great QB. By your logic you tryin to tell me Jeff Hostetler, Joe Flacco & Doug Williams better than Marino, Fouts, & Moon? GTFOH, stay in the Reason & post some shit about the Fat Boys my dude. SMH
Inglewood_B;c-10042729 said:5 Grand;c-10042635 said:grYmes;c-10041927 said:5 Grand;c-10041517 said:Moore7s;c-10039725 said:"@5 Grand" u buggin
Football is a team sport and is very situational. If I'm starting a franchise I 100% take Marino over Williams.
grYmes;c-10039770 said:Winning the Super Bowl doesn’t historically make you a great QB. Trent Dilfer, Brad Johnson and so many others have won but more because of the team around them. They didn’t have the stats, clutch performances or longevity to be considered greats individually.
All time greats like Marino, Dan Fouts & Warren Moon are light years ahead of Williams and others. They just didn’t have the D or didn’t have the breaks to win it all.
Taking Doug Williams overall just because he won a Super Bowl over Marino puts your football common sense on notice.
There's another element of football that you guys didn't address. Namely; performance under pressure.
In Superbowl XXII Williams passed for a Super Bowl record 340 yards and four touchdowns, with one interception.
In Super Bowl XIX, Marino passed for 318 yards, one touchdown pass and two interceptions.
So who's better?
Who would you pick to start in a Superbowl?
Clutch performing & “playing under pressure” is the same damn thing.
Williams played against a average defense and played along with Timmy Smith. Who broke the Super Bowl rushing record & has just as much argument as being the MVP in that game. Without Elway the Broncos in the 80s would of been trash.
Marino played against a highly underrated 49ers D & the best team in the 80s.
Come on bruh. Plus Marino has had clutch performances before. His surrounding cast just wasn’t enough to get a ring.
Just stop.
Think about what your saying.
The most important thing in football is winning the Superbowl. Thats indisputable. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that a QB's regular season statistics are irrelevant. The only thing that matters is who won the Superbowl.
![]()
So let me get this straight, you guys are saying that stats are more important than winning the Superbowl?
Are you saying Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson are better than Dan Marino and Philip Rivers?
aneed123;c-10043234 said:he gotta be trolling
I'm saying that winning a Superbowl>>>
If you don't understand that then you don't understand the objective of playing football.
You trollin. You too damn old to not understand what we saying.
Last edited: