A1000MILES
New member
I said west African...And I said the white shouldn't be thanked....And I'm Nigerian, nigga...Been there, done that....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A1000MILES;4707401 said:I said west African...And I said the white shouldn't be thanked....And I'm Nigerian, nigga...Been there, done that....
A1000MILES;4707059 said:I mean...In all honesty...The average American black is much better off than the average west African...Stop bitchin...Aside from actually thanking the white man, ain't shit wrong wit what he said...
over_kill;4707435 said:Soooo White People fucked up Africa? I thought they was having problems before the ships arrived. Did know it was a Utopian society.
smh...he reminds me of barkley tooSuperstarCole;4707279 said:SleepwalkingInJapan;4707264 said:no diss to my southern bruhs...
but i'll bet my membership hes from miss, alabama or florida...
DING DING DING
skpjr78
July 30 Posts: 1,207
europeans came to africa to be educated for centuries. while africans were building pyramids europeans were living in caves. while europeans were stuck in the dark ages and spreading the plauge throughout the continent timbukto was a global trade and academic center. the same can be said for alexandria, cairo, and socities throughout sub saharan africa like the nok. shit wasnt perfect in west africa nor was it perfect in the western hemisphere. but i doubt that native americans will say they are better off today than they were before the europeans showed up. same can be said for the entire african diaspora
over_kill;4707549 said:skpjr78
July 30 Posts: 1,207
europeans came to africa to be educated for centuries. while africans were building pyramids europeans were living in caves. while europeans were stuck in the dark ages and spreading the plauge throughout the continent timbukto was a global trade and academic center. the same can be said for alexandria, cairo, and socities throughout sub saharan africa like the nok. shit wasnt perfect in west africa nor was it perfect in the western hemisphere. but i doubt that native americans will say they are better off today than they were before the europeans showed up. same can be said for the entire african diaspora
So basiclly the dumbass white man came from out the caves, learned from the Black Mans education, applied the Black Mans ways and took over the World?
That's the greatest underdog story I've ever heard of.
So today the Black Man don't want the White mans education huh.
Hmmmm
over_kill;4707673 said:Yup.
All they need was employees. The fight would've been the same as it is now. About wages. About the rich vs the poor.
What people fail to see because racism blocks their view is that, like today outsourcing jobs to different countries due to cheaper labor, is practically the same thing as slavery accept they in-sourced cheaper labor in order not to pay their White poor brothers wages.
Slaves and slavery was an investment. It was a buisness. In order to do good buisness you need to provide a good product. Right.
There was white people that wasn't even eating better than the slaves but we are lead to believe that every white person had big plantations and numerous amounts of slavesI.
When poor white protested what happen? They gave them racism. A reason to hate. Your better than them.
Really if they wanted to make this a white nation they should've paid there own people to do the labor. It would've workout better in my opinion.
Ignorant white people always feel that minorities are and have been taking jobs from them but they hardly ever blame their rich counterparts (atleast the racist ones don't. Look at poor rednecks voting republican today).
High Revolutionary;4707646 said:over_kill;4707549 said:skpjr78
July 30 Posts: 1,207
europeans came to africa to be educated for centuries. while africans were building pyramids europeans were living in caves. while europeans were stuck in the dark ages and spreading the plauge throughout the continent timbukto was a global trade and academic center. the same can be said for alexandria, cairo, and socities throughout sub saharan africa like the nok. shit wasnt perfect in west africa nor was it perfect in the western hemisphere. but i doubt that native americans will say they are better off today than they were before the europeans showed up. same can be said for the entire african diaspora
So basiclly the dumbass white man came from out the caves, learned from the Black Mans education, applied the Black Mans ways and took over the World?
That's the greatest underdog story I've ever heard of.
So today the Black Man don't want the White mans education huh.
Hmmmm
Out of curiosity do you think America would be where it is today without the contributions of African Americans?
“There Would Be No United States as We Now Know It Today Without Slavery”
Slavery fueled the foundation and rise of not just capitalism in general, but the U.S. in particular. This is not just a “stain” that can eventually be washed, or even scrubbed, away within the confines of this system; it is embedded in the very fabric of this society—indeed, the U.S. Constitution itself legally institutionalized slavery and deemed African-Americans to count as only 3/5 of a white person for census purposes.
In the recently published work, Communism and Jeffersonian Democracy, Bob Avakian wrote:
There is a semi-official narrative about the history and the “greatness” of America, which says that this greatness of America lies in the freedom and ingenuity of its people, and above all in a system that gives encouragement and reward to these qualities. Now, in opposition to this semi-official narrative about the greatness of America, the reality is that—to return to one fundamental aspect of all this—slavery has been an indispensable part of the foundation for the “freedom and prosperity” of the USA. The combination of freedom and prosperity is, as we know, still today, and in some ways today more than ever, proclaimed as the unique quality and the special destiny and mission of the United States and its role in the world. And this stands in stark contradiction to the fact that without slavery, none of this—not even the bourgeois-democratic freedoms, let alone the prosperity—would have been possible, not only in the southern United States but in the North as well, in the country as a whole and in its development and emergence as a world economic and military power.
Obviously, the way in which agriculture in the South developed was directly related to, indeed founded on, the system of slavery. But, beyond that, the way in which the U.S. related to the world market, and built up its prosperity and economic base in that way, was to a very large degree dependent on slave-based production. The interchange between the development of manufacture in the North and the development of agriculture in the South, for example—even when, before the Civil War, that interchange went to a large degree through the world market and through England in particular, where for example cotton would be sold to the textile mills in England and other products would be sold from England to the northern manufacturers in the U.S. —even that would not have happened in the way it did, on the kind of scale it did and with the prosperity that it led to, without slavery. Of course, this process—where, for example, cotton from the southern U.S. was to a large degree sold to England, rather than to New England—contributed over time to sharpening the contradiction between the slave system in the South and the developing capitalist system in the North of the U.S. But the point to emphasize here is that, in an overall and fundamental sense, the slave-grown products of the southern U.S. constituted a major factor in the development of the U.S. economy, in the North as well as the South. And the development of that economy, in turn, has been the essential underlying basis for the massive military machinery which is the ultimate enforcer of the role of the U.S. as a major world power.
In short: There would be no United States as we now know it today without slavery. That is a simple and basic truth.17
http://revcom.us/a/144/BNQ-en.html
In short: There would be no United States as we now know it today without slavery. That is a simple and basic truth.17