desertrain10;c-9597275 said:Plutarch;c-9596510 said:Shuffington;c-9596414 said:yeah, A link or some sort of reference would be nice.
This.
If it's true (whatever "they cutting off welfare" exactly means), then I don't think that's a good thing. I'm generally against the "welfare system," but cutting it abruptly is not the proper way to address the problem. Some people are very much dependent on welfare.
meh
an advanced capitalist society could not sustain itself without a welfare system
You keep on expressing your dislike of capitalism, and I keep on telling you that I believe that your understanding of capitalism is flawed. And this might be yet another example.
I'm not sure what you exactly mean by "advanced" and "welfare system," but I would argue that a capitalist society generally thrives well with a very limited "welfare system" or with no "welfare system" at all.
I believe that the kind of welfare system that currently operates in the United States is counterproductive in regard to the mitigation of poverty, the opportunity for social mobility, and the production of wealth.