Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
aneed123;c-10038634 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038413 said:As an eagle scout, I'm cool with it as long as you dissolve the girl scouts and/or combine the two and just call it Scouts as stayed before.
I'm cool with egalitarianism as long as its true egalitarianism and not this pseudo egalitarian bullshit where women are afforded the exact same opportunities, power, ect but without the same expectation of performance, stardands, accountability, and/or responsibility as men are. They can almost always fall back on their femininity in regards to shortcomings.
That's the real problem most men have with women "invading" traditional male spaces and/or roles. It's not that they are female it's that they are often held to lower standards , get special consessions for the same positions as men yet expect men to respect them as equalsoften times for doing less.
So yeah I'm cool with it and any other male space a woman wants to be apart of as long as the female space is dissolved and she is held to the exact same standards as men/boys under the same circumstances. You shouldn't get to invade male spaces and keep your female space while simultaneously inevitably changing/destroying the culture of the male space and getting special privileges to help you do both.
They dont want that they want to be able to join boy scouts while having girls scouts exclusively just for females.. smh
SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
jono;c-10038842 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
But letting the girl in now creates a whole new dynamic that has to be accounted for. She's not a boy and thus different things are needed that weren't needed before.
DoubleShotHelix;c-10038849 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
Because it's indicative of a deeper gynocentric culture.
Their incessant need to shoehorn themselves into male spaces and have the culture changed around and for them while maintaining the sanctity of their of spaces and ideologies.
Turfaholic;c-10037876 said:Koltrain;c-10037842 said:This is dumb... just combine the two orgs at this point...cause the next step is for boys to be allowed in girl scouts.. Either way, I don't like the direction society is headed with gender identification.
This is the key that vibe and Ms. Southern are missing. No racism, but this is a blurred line that only white people seem to not see. Allowing boys to go to school dressed as girls. I have nothing against the gays or lesbians. I might crack jokes about them. But I'm comfortable in my own skin to not be disturbed by them. I've held many conversations with flamboyant gay men. Had transgendered people attempt to flirt with me. Thought nothing of it. My issue is adults pushing a narrative that gender is a choice, not nature. "Boys can do whatever girls can, and vice versa. The choice is yours". If you wanna live a gay life lil nigga, live a gay life. I just hope a kid isn't influenced to that lifestyle because adults set the standard that there is no such thing as genders. The tone is starting to be set that if a man chooses to live as a woman, everybody else is supposed to just pretend that woman wasn't born with a penis. That's insanity.
blackrain;c-10038932 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038849 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
Because it's indicative of a deeper gynocentric culture.
Their incessant need to shoehorn themselves into male spaces and have the culture changed around and for them while maintaining the sanctity of their of spaces and ideologies.
So the fact that the boy scouts initiated this means?
blackrain;c-10038932 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038849 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
Because it's indicative of a deeper gynocentric culture.
Their incessant need to shoehorn themselves into male spaces and have the culture changed around and for them while maintaining the sanctity of their of spaces and ideologies.
So the fact that the boy scouts initiated this means?
Koltrain;c-10039127 said:blackrain;c-10038932 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038849 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
Because it's indicative of a deeper gynocentric culture.
Their incessant need to shoehorn themselves into male spaces and have the culture changed around and for them while maintaining the sanctity of their of spaces and ideologies.
So the fact that the boy scouts initiated this means?
They initiated in response to being sued..the question is why were there successful lawsuits against them for not allowing girls in?
DoubleShotHelix;c-10038990 said:blackrain;c-10038932 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038849 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
Because it's indicative of a deeper gynocentric culture.
Their incessant need to shoehorn themselves into male spaces and have the culture changed around and for them while maintaining the sanctity of their of spaces and ideologies.
So the fact that the boy scouts initiated this means?
Again, all inclusive gynocentric culture in an attempt to be progressive watering down the culture.
It's akin to black Americans accepting anyone with rhythm that might have colored with a black crayon at some point in life as black. Meanwhile no other culture would do the same for you.
In this case boy scouts trying to be kumbyah progressive and all inclusive meanwhile if a little boy tries to join girl scouts see what happens.
That's how cultures, empires, movements get destroyed a lot of the time you start being a little too friendly, too accommodating, too accepting and little shit starts to change and you shrug it off cause it's miniscule to the big picture then one day you wake up and the black power movement has been taken over by the lbtglmnop community and now they're pushing their agenda under your banner and you're a social pariah in your own movement.
That's why even though theyre my enemies I can understand and empathize with the alt right movement and I wish black Americans would take a hard line stance like that. Stop letting everyone in your house because eventually they'll change the culture, ideology, direction, and message so much that you'll be the outsider in your own shit.
Meanwhile, I bet they won't let you in their shit. And if they just so happen to let you in I bet they aren't going to allow you to change ideology, policy, ect you're going to have to acquiesce to their shit.
DoubleShotHelix;c-10038849 said:SneakDZA;c-10038815 said:i'm truly surprised people actually give a shit about this.
Because it's indicative of a deeper gynocentric culture.
Their incessant need to shoehorn themselves into male spaces and have the culture changed around and for them while maintaining the sanctity of their of spaces and ideologies.
Will Munny;c-10039655 said:People who don't see something wrong with this aren't real people. Men and women need time away from each other.
playmaker88;c-10039784 said:Will Munny;c-10039655 said:People who don't see something wrong with this aren't real people. Men and women need time away from each other.
They arent men and women they are kids.. kids are raised and socialized a part fomr a very early age.. and also not many kids goto the boy or girlscouts ..
HundredEyes ;c-10039813 said:playmaker88;c-10039784 said:Will Munny;c-10039655 said:People who don't see something wrong with this aren't real people. Men and women need time away from each other.
They arent men and women they are kids.. kids are raised and socialized a part fomr a very early age.. and also not many kids goto the boy or girlscouts ..
How about football/soccer teams?
Can there still be a boy/girl scout group or does the blend has to be absolute?
blackrain;c-10038808 said:aneed123;c-10038634 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038413 said:As an eagle scout, I'm cool with it as long as you dissolve the girl scouts and/or combine the two and just call it Scouts as stayed before.
I'm cool with egalitarianism as long as its true egalitarianism and not this pseudo egalitarian bullshit where women are afforded the exact same opportunities, power, ect but without the same expectation of performance, stardands, accountability, and/or responsibility as men are. They can almost always fall back on their femininity in regards to shortcomings.
That's the real problem most men have with women "invading" traditional male spaces and/or roles. It's not that they are female it's that they are often held to lower standards , get special consessions for the same positions as men yet expect men to respect them as equalsoften times for doing less.
So yeah I'm cool with it and any other male space a woman wants to be apart of as long as the female space is dissolved and she is held to the exact same standards as men/boys under the same circumstances. You shouldn't get to invade male spaces and keep your female space while simultaneously inevitably changing/destroying the culture of the male space and getting special privileges to help you do both.
They dont want that they want to be able to join boy scouts while having girls scouts exclusively just for females.. smh
This idea didn't stem from women. This is the boy scouts trying to make back money theyve lost in lawsuits