2stepz_ahead;c-10039977 said:blackrain;c-10038808 said:aneed123;c-10038634 said:DoubleShotHelix;c-10038413 said:As an eagle scout, I'm cool with it as long as you dissolve the girl scouts and/or combine the two and just call it Scouts as stayed before.
I'm cool with egalitarianism as long as its true egalitarianism and not this pseudo egalitarian bullshit where women are afforded the exact same opportunities, power, ect but without the same expectation of performance, stardands, accountability, and/or responsibility as men are. They can almost always fall back on their femininity in regards to shortcomings.
That's the real problem most men have with women "invading" traditional male spaces and/or roles. It's not that they are female it's that they are often held to lower standards , get special consessions for the same positions as men yet expect men to respect them as equalsoften times for doing less.
So yeah I'm cool with it and any other male space a woman wants to be apart of as long as the female space is dissolved and she is held to the exact same standards as men/boys under the same circumstances. You shouldn't get to invade male spaces and keep your female space while simultaneously inevitably changing/destroying the culture of the male space and getting special privileges to help you do both.
They dont want that they want to be able to join boy scouts while having girls scouts exclusively just for females.. smh
This idea didn't stem from women. This is the boy scouts trying to make back money theyve lost in lawsuits
what? from being sued by parent of boiys who were touched by they leader?
so add girls is the solution?
sounds like more lawsuits
Part of the reason the girl scouts are like fuck no...this is bad decision making on yhe part of the boy scouts