The Official Trump Supporters Thread For The Next Four Years +

[5th Letter]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

I'm talking about black people. If we're talking about in general then of course they're not the same.

 

[Undefeatable]

Accusations of racism have dogged Sessions's career: Actually, they almost derailed it. In 1986, a Senate committee denied Sessions, then a 39-year-old U.S. attorney in Alabama, a federal judgeship. His former colleagues testified Sessions used the n-word and joked about the Ku Klux Klan, saying he thought they were "okay, until he learned that they smoked marijuana."



Yeesh

so Trump just made a Klansman who may or may not shut down legal weed top cop

But yknow

At least he never said "superpredators"

No one is defending trump. And regarding the "super predator" remark, that wasnt the worst part of that situation. The worst part is the bill that we still see the effect of today.

It's not a matter of defending Trump or not. A lot of people have been saying that between Hillary and Trump, neither one is really better for black people.

And is just false, as will become even clearer over time.

 

[Max.]

Waaa

Waaaa

Waaaa

 

[xxCivicxx]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

 

[Peace_79]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

Who is responsible for the economic position of black people in America?

 

[xxCivicxx]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

Who is responsible for the economic position of black people in America?

White supremacy

 

[Peace_79]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

Who is responsible for the economic position of black people in America?

White supremacy

I asked who.

Personify it.

What person, group of people, or combination of groups of people; are responsible for the current economic position of each black person in America?

Democrats, Republicans, White People, People who vote, US Presidents etc.

Let's get specific.

 

[the dukester]

Imagine, for a moment, you are a white male somewhere in America who just lost his job at a factory. Your mortgage is in default, your car is being repossessed, and you wonder whether you’ll be able to find a job, much less one that pays a decent wage. You have no particular animosity towards blacks, gays, women, but you constantly hear the message that as a white, straight male, you are the paragon of privilege and that the hardships in your life are irrelevant or made up. You don’t feel so privileged. Are your struggles and fears really so different from those of the minority groups?

It’s easy to see why that person voted for the candidate who acknowledged his fears and against the candidate (and party) who dismissed his concerns because he was not a minority.

In other words, it's not ALWAYS racism. Sometimes it's classicism. The powers that be are always seeking to parlay a come-up, using divide & conquer tactics to pad their bank accounts.

These tactics were Donald Trump's Modus Operandi.

 

[ghostdog56]

Imagine, for a moment, you are a white male somewhere in America who just lost his job at a factory. Your mortgage is in default, your car is being repossessed, and you wonder whether you’ll be able to find a job, much less one that pays a decent wage. You have no particular animosity towards blacks, gays, women, but you constantly hear the message that as a white, straight male, you are the paragon of privilege and that the hardships in your life are irrelevant or made up. You don’t feel so privileged. Are your struggles and fears really so different from those of the minority groups?

It’s easy to see why that person voted for the candidate who acknowledged his fears and against the candidate (and party) who dismissed his concerns because he was not a minority.

In other words, it's not ALWAYS racism. Sometimes it's classicism. The powers that be are always seeking to parlay a come-up, using divide & conquer tactics to pad their bank accounts.

These tactics were Donald Trump's Modus Operandi.

Shit, if a white dude lost his job, mortgage in default, and car about to be repossessed, that means theirs a nigga who couldn't get a job, is homeless, and riding the bus.

 

[JJ_Evans]

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

Before the election threads began, I kinda like you as a poster (mod?).

Since you've revealed yourself as either a) Purposely trying to sound dumb or b) Actually being a dumb fuck in real life, I've lost respect for you man. Whether you're an undercover racist white boy or a smart-dumb nigga, most of your political posts are asinine.

 

[Fosheezy]

Niggas in here defending HILLARY.

The bitch pulled hot sauce out of her purse on radio for fucks sake.

 

[NoCompetition]

Niggas in here defending HILLARY.

The bitch pulled hot sauce out of her purse on radio for fucks sake.

Yeah, the horror haha. Fck the implications of having the alternative in office. She had some hot sauce. I'll say again she had some hot sauce!

 

[JJ_Evans]

Niggas in here defending HILLARY.

The bitch pulled hot sauce out of her purse on radio for fucks sake.

Shut your dumb ass up.

You're talking about some fuckin hot sauce and Trump is appointing known white nationalists and Klan members to his cabinet.

 

[Peace_79]

Imagine, for a moment, you are a white male somewhere in America who just lost his job at a factory. Your mortgage is in default, your car is being repossessed, and you wonder whether you’ll be able to find a job, much less one that pays a decent wage. You have no particular animosity towards blacks, gays, women, but you constantly hear the message that as a white, straight male, you are the paragon of privilege and that the hardships in your life are irrelevant or made up. You don’t feel so privileged. Are your struggles and fears really so different from those of the minority groups?

It’s easy to see why that person voted for the candidate who acknowledged his fears and against the candidate (and party) who dismissed his concerns because he was not a minority.

In other words, it's not ALWAYS racism. Sometimes it's classicism. The powers that be are always seeking to parlay a come-up, using divide & conquer tactics to pad their bank accounts.

These tactics were Donald Trump's Modus Operandi.

I agree with this.

Two points.

- If you vote for bigotry and discrimination towards others, on some level you are bigoted yourself.

- Donald Trump will likely not help any of the issues you mentioned for lower to middle class blacks, whites or anyone else in America.

In fact, his plans as prescribed and erratic behaivor have been predicted by experts to make domestic and international issues considerably WORSE than they are today.

And much of what he promised isn't even possible.

I care very little about a candidate acknowledging my fears and aspirations ... that's emotional.

I care what they are going to do about them.

Anyone who intended for Trump to win, acted opposite of their own self interest.

Even the 1%, who stand to get their taxes cut in half, absorbed considerable risk in doing so.

 

[JJ_Evans]

If the opinions of the non voters don't matter then why is there a thread specifically for the opinions of non voters? Am I missing something here?

First of all, some of these posters claiming to be non-voters are actually Trump voters. They spent entirely too much time on this site trashing Trumps' opponent, which in turn propped up Trump.

Lastly, just like the undercover Trump voters, the actual non-voting posters were not even handed with their criticism. They were firmly anti-Hillary/Democrats, so yes that actually helped sway some people either towards Trump or swayed them into not voting at all.

 

[kzzl]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

Who is responsible for the economic position of black people in America?

White supremacy

I asked who.

Personify it.

What person, group of people, or combination of groups of people; are responsible for the current economic position of each black person in America?

Democrats, Republicans, White People, People who vote, US Presidents etc.

Let's get specific.

To be specific, white supremacy is an ideology. It's own religion with people from all walks of life as its followers.

 

[xxCivicxx]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

Who is responsible for the economic position of black people in America?

White supremacy

I asked who.

Personify it.

What person, group of people, or combination of groups of people; are responsible for the current economic position of each black person in America?

Democrats, Republicans, White People, People who vote, US Presidents etc.

Let's get specific.

White supremacists

 

[Peace_79]

Niggas in here defending HILLARY.

The bitch pulled hot sauce out of her purse on radio for fucks sake.

True.

That's what I look for in my presidential candidates ...

Hot sauce.

 

[Peace_79]

Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.

And black people were at the bottom the entire time so once again, what is your point?

Who is responsible for the economic position of black people in America?

White supremacy

I asked who.

Personify it.

What person, group of people, or combination of groups of people; are responsible for the current economic position of each black person in America?

Democrats, Republicans, White People, People who vote, US Presidents etc.

Let's get specific.

White supremacists

How does white supremacy manifest itself?

Also - I am going to assume that you are in a favorable economic position, yourself.

While at the same time being African American.

Is that accurate?

 

[5th Letter]

So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

Before the election threads began, I kinda like you as a poster (mod?).

Since you've revealed yourself as either a) Purposely trying to sound dumb or b) Actually being a dumb fuck in real life, I've lost respect for you man. Whether you're an undercover racist white boy or a smart-dumb nigga, most of your political posts are asinine.

Oh noes!!!