The Official Trump Supporters Thread For The Next Four Years +

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
NoCompetition;9500791 said:
People dont respond to me with no idiocy. Im presenting things in clear common sense format. Nonvoters and 3rd party voters (while not as bad at least you gave your say) helped Trump win. Accept it cause its true. Not my fault. Keep your frustration to yourself. That last reply that I responded to wass pitiful...im not fckin with people with that type of mentality. Im no longer taking this thread seriously. That was some of the most nonsensical pathetic sht I have ever read from a type I dont fck with. Haha

No. Hilary was horrible my nigga, like really horrible. She took the election for granted and thought niggaz & poor white folks would vote for her outta fear of Trump. She didnt campaign in areas she needed too. Don't blame me for not voting for her. Fuck you

 
blackamerica;9502050 said:
NoCompetition;9500791 said:
People dont respond to me with no idiocy. Im presenting things in clear common sense format. Nonvoters and 3rd party voters (while not as bad at least you gave your say) helped Trump win. Accept it cause its true. Not my fault. Keep your frustration to yourself. That last reply that I responded to wass pitiful...im not fckin with people with that type of mentality. Im no longer taking this thread seriously. That was some of the most nonsensical pathetic sht I have ever read from a type I dont fck with. Haha

No. Hilary was horrible my nigga, like really horrible. She took the election for granted and thought niggaz & poor white folks would vote for her outta fear of Trump. She didnt campaign in areas she needed too. Don't blame me for not voting for her. Fuck you

And she slowed down n got lazy toward the end. Even avoided debates with Sanders before they railroaded him out the race. The pandering she did to blacks was mockery imo.

Theres no amount of dislike of Trump I can have to put my faith in/vote for someone else I cant take serious.

Social media went from "2016 Presidential Race: This Cant be Life" type memes to "Why didnt yall vote!!!"

Foh
 
Last edited:
Swiffness!;9498131 said:
lol imma laugh at you "Hillary is a warmonger" cats when Secretary of State John Bolton encourages Trump to launch the nukes at Iran
to be fair, the "Hillary is a warmonger" argument was a) more about Clinton-versus-Trump and is b) still an accurate statement no matter what

 
JJ_Evans;9501308 said:
I see that you clowns had your emergency secret meeting to figure out how to battle me since I've exposed all the undercover racist white boys and stupid coons that helped elect Donald Trump.

...

Y'all dumb ass thought you had the perfect marketing strategy to distract people from y'all being responsible for every foul thing Trump does to black people...........
so basically your MO is now:

*declare everyone you disagree with to be an undercover white boy*

*rage against people declaring you an undercover white boy to be a terrible disinformation strategy*

hmmm

 
Undefeatable;9501832 said:
Only someone who does not follow politics would think that Clinton is anywhere near as bad as Trump for blacks. She probably would have been good actually.

Nah you're just very very stupid

Google pizzagate then come back and apologize for embarrassing yourself in this thread
 
Go figure;9502120 said:
blackamerica;9502050 said:
NoCompetition;9500791 said:
People dont respond to me with no idiocy. Im presenting things in clear common sense format. Nonvoters and 3rd party voters (while not as bad at least you gave your say) helped Trump win. Accept it cause its true. Not my fault. Keep your frustration to yourself. That last reply that I responded to wass pitiful...im not fckin with people with that type of mentality. Im no longer taking this thread seriously. That was some of the most nonsensical pathetic sht I have ever read from a type I dont fck with. Haha

No. Hilary was horrible my nigga, like really horrible. She took the election for granted and thought niggaz & poor white folks would vote for her outta fear of Trump. She didnt campaign in areas she needed too. Don't blame me for not voting for her. Fuck you

And she slowed down n got lazy toward the end. Even avoided debates with Sanders before they railroaded him out the race. The pandering she did to blacks was mockery imo.

Theres no amount of dislike of Trump I can have to put my faith in/vote for someone else I cant take serious.

Social media went from "2016 Presidential Race: This Cant be Life" type memes to "Why didnt yall vote!!!"

Foh

Nah Hillary brought out Jay-Z and Pusha T for a concert. That means she really cares about black issues /sarcasm

She didn't put together any kind of town hall meeting with black people to discuss real issues. She gave these goofy niggas a concert of drug raps and that means she cares about black people smh
 
Accusations of racism have dogged Sessions's career: Actually, they almost derailed it. In 1986, a Senate committee denied Sessions, then a 39-year-old U.S. attorney in Alabama, a federal judgeship. His former colleagues testified Sessions used the n-word and joked about the Ku Klux Klan, saying he thought they were "okay, until he learned that they smoked marijuana."



Yeesh

so Trump just made a Klansman who may or may not shut down legal weed top cop

But yknow

At least he never said "superpredators"

 
Swiffness!;9502931 said:
Accusations of racism have dogged Sessions's career: Actually, they almost derailed it. In 1986, a Senate committee denied Sessions, then a 39-year-old U.S. attorney in Alabama, a federal judgeship. His former colleagues testified Sessions used the n-word and joked about the Ku Klux Klan, saying he thought they were "okay, until he learned that they smoked marijuana."



Yeesh

so Trump just made a Klansman who may or may not shut down legal weed top cop

But yknow

At least he never said "superpredators"

SMH you need to change your avi ASAP, you know damn well Sean P (RIP) wouldn't approve of your thotty tone.

To quote the great Sean Price:

I sell dope to your momma

And I ain't even vote for Obama - P!

...

I make money from the dope I push

To make it funny I ain't vote for Bush
 
Swiffness!;9502931 said:
Accusations of racism have dogged Sessions's career: Actually, they almost derailed it. In 1986, a Senate committee denied Sessions, then a 39-year-old U.S. attorney in Alabama, a federal judgeship. His former colleagues testified Sessions used the n-word and joked about the Ku Klux Klan, saying he thought they were "okay, until he learned that they smoked marijuana."



Yeesh

so Trump just made a Klansman who may or may not shut down legal weed top cop



But yknow

At least he never said "superpredators"

That probably won't happen because trump is a populist look for this white house to have a policy of leaving a lot of shit up to the states. This will be the way trump escapes dealing with certain social issues and will be very appealing to his base.
 
Swiffness!;9502931 said:
Accusations of racism have dogged Sessions's career: Actually, they almost derailed it. In 1986, a Senate committee denied Sessions, then a 39-year-old U.S. attorney in Alabama, a federal judgeship. His former colleagues testified Sessions used the n-word and joked about the Ku Klux Klan, saying he thought they were "okay, until he learned that they smoked marijuana."



Yeesh

so Trump just made a Klansman who may or may not shut down legal weed top cop

But yknow

At least he never said "superpredators"

No one is defending trump. And regarding the "super predator" remark, that wasnt the worst part of that situation. The worst part is the bill that we still see the effect of today.
 
So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?
 
5th Letter;9503401 said:
So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.
 
Last edited:
NoCompetition;9503428 said:
5th Letter;9503401 said:
So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.
 


Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.
5th Letter;9503439 said:
NoCompetition;9503428 said:
5th Letter;9503401 said:
So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

 
Last edited:
NoCompetition;9503465 said:
Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.
5th Letter;9503439 said:
NoCompetition;9503428 said:
5th Letter;9503401 said:
So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.
 
5th Letter;9503479 said:
NoCompetition;9503465 said:
Meh no telling. Its irrelevant at this point. She's different and "would have" done different things. There's a whole country to consider. For instance Democratic and Republican economic policies tend to be different. Effecting the whole country including Black people. Some people seem to think they would have lost regardless. Thats on them I dont really agree. The playing field would have played out differently with her. Thats all I can say. Trump's started making appointments. Those same positions would be filled with different people if it was Hillary, therefore having different results. That much cant be denied. Elections have effects. Beyond that it gets to individual perspectives and opinions. One person may like something another may not.
5th Letter;9503439 said:
NoCompetition;9503428 said:
5th Letter;9503401 said:
So y'all prefer Hillary to appoint people that aren't open about their racism as opposed to those that are open about it? What's the difference?

They'd most likely be appointing different people from, for the most part different parties. Who knows what she woulda done though. Its speculation at this point. Yeah a lotta people woulda preferred to roll with her though. a majority of voters it just didnt work out that way.

She would've appointed a bunch of smile in your face but stab you in your back democrats. A bunch of people who pretend to be for black people but then create policy's that doesn't do anything for us or flat out ignore our issues. Trump appointed a bunch of people who are open and honest about their feelings about black people, people who will tell you they are creating policy's that is going to affect us negatively. Hillary's people would've pretended that their policy's weren't done to directly fuck black people over while they come around and dance with us. That's the difference.

I have 50+ years of evidence to back up what I'm saying. No matter who's been in office from Nixon to Obama they all do the same thing. Trump is just the first president in years to be open about it.

They all do the same things? Strange I noticed a lot of differences between say Clinton's Presidency (record economy for instance) to Bush (record recession, wars) to Obama (economic recovery). They arent all identical robots its impossible for them to all be the same. There are Supreme court decisions, cabinets, senate, etc. With all kinds of different perspectives and motivations. Nixon was impeached for fcks sake that alone is different from Obama. Something about this thread man I left it alone yesterday it may just be a good idea for me to stay out of this one all together haha.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
478
Views
1,622
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…