The Official Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase 2 thread - Now Playing "AntMan"

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
fortyacres&amule;7984724 said:
Joss Whedon Says Edgar Wright's 'Ant-Man' Was 'Best Script Marvel Ever Had'

When director Edgar Wright left his longtime passion project Ant-Man over “creative differences” with Marvel, no one was more shocked than Joss Whedon. In a lengthy new Buzzfeed profile of Whedon, the Avengers: Age of Ultron director says that he still has no idea what happened between Wright and Marvel — but that Wright’s Ant-Man screenplay was one of the best he’d ever seen.

“I thought the script was not only the best script that Marvel had ever had, but the most Marvel script I’d read,” Whedon tells Buzzfeed. “I had no interest in Ant-Man. [Then] I read the script, and was like, Of course! This is so good! It reminded me of the books when I read them. Irreverent and funny and could make what was small large, and vice versa.”

“I don’t know where things went wrong,” he continues. “But I was very sad. Because I thought, This is a no-brainer. This is Marvel getting it exactly right. Whatever dissonance that came, whatever it was, I don’t understand why it was bigger than a marriage that seemed so right. But I’m not going to say it was definitely all Marvel, or Edgar’s gone mad! I felt like they would complement each other by the ways that they were different. And, uh, somethin’ happened.”

British filmmaker Wright, known for his “Cornetto trilogy” of Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, and The World’s End, began developing Ant-Man in 2006. Last May, Wright exited the project after eight years, with an official joint statement from Wright and Marvel citing “differences in their visions of the film.” Production resumed under new director Peyton Reed. Whedon is speaking more freely now that he’s stepping back from the Marvel universe, but last year, he gave a more understated show of solidarity for Wright: Tweeting out a picture of himself holding a Cornetto ice cream wrapper (below). Ant-Man is set to open on July 16.

That's all well and good, but the rumors are mostly that Wright didn't want Antman tied into the MCU at all. I don't care how good his script was, Marvel was right to tell him to kick rocks if he was inflexible on that.
 
1CK1S;7984964 said:
South Korea Pays Marvel $3.6M To Make Sure It Looks Cool in 'Avengers: Age of Ultron'



27DB013C00000578-3050093-image-a-40_1429695675836.jpg


The South Korean government paid an eye-watering £2.4million to the makers of the new Avengers movie to ensure the country is shown in a positive light, it has emerged.

Much of the comic book film, Avengers: Age of Ultron, was shot in Seoul and the country's culture ministry agreed to cover a third of filming costs in the city on the agreement the Republic of Korea is shown as 'high tech' and 'modern'.

The use of public funds in what appears to be an extreme case of product placement has been criticised by South Koreans - as officials are having to wait with the rest of the world to see if the film, released on Thursday, will lift the country's reputation out of the shadow of it's headline-grabbing northern neighbour.

The move echoes that of Sony Pictures Entertainment and MGM, who recently made headlines after leaked emails revealed the Mexican government had offered the studios $20m to ensure a positive portrayal of the country in Spectre.

Kim Young-gun, who overseas the Korean Film Council's (KOFIC) incentive program for foreign films, said the film could transform the status of Seoul, which has been largely overlooked by Hollywood compared to its regional peers.

He told MailOnline: 'If we have that kind of huge film, which shows Korea in a more positive way, then we think the image of Korea will be changed in a positive way.'

In return, the country's culture ministry agreed to pay 30 percent of the cost of production in Seoul, about £2.4m. Only on Thursday will they know if it will boost the international image of the capital and make it as iconic abroad as Asian metropolises like Tokyo.

Kim said: 'KOFIC and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, also, are concerned about how they will portray Korea in the film, but we are looking forward to seeing the film on Thursday.'

KOFIC has estimated the sequel to the 2012 hit The Avengers, which features an all-star cast including Scarlett Johansson and Robert Downey Jnr, could attract some 620,000 extra tourists to the country. The film has already sold 94 percent of its presale tickets.

Smart politics I'd say. A movie as big as this one...with such worldwide appeal, will allow for millions to see Seoul Ina different light than the usual. That can drive tourism profits upward. That 2 million pound number will be recouped pretty quickly, I'd suspect.
 
Freudian;7985133 said:
1CK1S;7984964 said:
South Korea Pays Marvel $3.6M To Make Sure It Looks Cool in 'Avengers: Age of Ultron'



27DB013C00000578-3050093-image-a-40_1429695675836.jpg


The South Korean government paid an eye-watering £2.4million to the makers of the new Avengers movie to ensure the country is shown in a positive light, it has emerged.

Much of the comic book film, Avengers: Age of Ultron, was shot in Seoul and the country's culture ministry agreed to cover a third of filming costs in the city on the agreement the Republic of Korea is shown as 'high tech' and 'modern'.

The use of public funds in what appears to be an extreme case of product placement has been criticised by South Koreans - as officials are having to wait with the rest of the world to see if the film, released on Thursday, will lift the country's reputation out of the shadow of it's headline-grabbing northern neighbour.

The move echoes that of Sony Pictures Entertainment and MGM, who recently made headlines after leaked emails revealed the Mexican government had offered the studios $20m to ensure a positive portrayal of the country in Spectre.

Kim Young-gun, who overseas the Korean Film Council's (KOFIC) incentive program for foreign films, said the film could transform the status of Seoul, which has been largely overlooked by Hollywood compared to its regional peers.

He told MailOnline: 'If we have that kind of huge film, which shows Korea in a more positive way, then we think the image of Korea will be changed in a positive way.'

In return, the country's culture ministry agreed to pay 30 percent of the cost of production in Seoul, about £2.4m. Only on Thursday will they know if it will boost the international image of the capital and make it as iconic abroad as Asian metropolises like Tokyo.

Kim said: 'KOFIC and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, also, are concerned about how they will portray Korea in the film, but we are looking forward to seeing the film on Thursday.'

KOFIC has estimated the sequel to the 2012 hit The Avengers, which features an all-star cast including Scarlett Johansson and Robert Downey Jnr, could attract some 620,000 extra tourists to the country. The film has already sold 94 percent of its presale tickets.

Smart politics I'd say. A movie as big as this one...with such worldwide appeal, will allow for millions to see Seoul Ina different light than the usual. That can drive tourism profits upward. That 2 million pound number will be recouped pretty quickly, I'd suspect.

Bad policy, ok politics.

This is an action movie. Shit is going to get fucked up. If you, as a cultural ministry, are willing to gamble money on a foreign made movie in the off chance that it will boost tourism, you are a fool.
 
soul rattler;7985149 said:
Freudian;7985133 said:
1CK1S;7984964 said:
South Korea Pays Marvel $3.6M To Make Sure It Looks Cool in 'Avengers: Age of Ultron'



27DB013C00000578-3050093-image-a-40_1429695675836.jpg


The South Korean government paid an eye-watering £2.4million to the makers of the new Avengers movie to ensure the country is shown in a positive light, it has emerged.

Much of the comic book film, Avengers: Age of Ultron, was shot in Seoul and the country's culture ministry agreed to cover a third of filming costs in the city on the agreement the Republic of Korea is shown as 'high tech' and 'modern'.

The use of public funds in what appears to be an extreme case of product placement has been criticised by South Koreans - as officials are having to wait with the rest of the world to see if the film, released on Thursday, will lift the country's reputation out of the shadow of it's headline-grabbing northern neighbour.

The move echoes that of Sony Pictures Entertainment and MGM, who recently made headlines after leaked emails revealed the Mexican government had offered the studios $20m to ensure a positive portrayal of the country in Spectre.

Kim Young-gun, who overseas the Korean Film Council's (KOFIC) incentive program for foreign films, said the film could transform the status of Seoul, which has been largely overlooked by Hollywood compared to its regional peers.

He told MailOnline: 'If we have that kind of huge film, which shows Korea in a more positive way, then we think the image of Korea will be changed in a positive way.'

In return, the country's culture ministry agreed to pay 30 percent of the cost of production in Seoul, about £2.4m. Only on Thursday will they know if it will boost the international image of the capital and make it as iconic abroad as Asian metropolises like Tokyo.

Kim said: 'KOFIC and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, also, are concerned about how they will portray Korea in the film, but we are looking forward to seeing the film on Thursday.'

KOFIC has estimated the sequel to the 2012 hit The Avengers, which features an all-star cast including Scarlett Johansson and Robert Downey Jnr, could attract some 620,000 extra tourists to the country. The film has already sold 94 percent of its presale tickets.

Smart politics I'd say. A movie as big as this one...with such worldwide appeal, will allow for millions to see Seoul Ina different light than the usual. That can drive tourism profits upward. That 2 million pound number will be recouped pretty quickly, I'd suspect.

Bad policy, ok politics.

This is an action movie. Shit is going to get fucked up. If you, as a cultural ministry, are willing to gamble money on a foreign made movie in the off chance that it will boost tourism, you are a fool.

We don't know that the entire movie will emphasize the destruction of Seoul, do we? Surely you know there are ways of filming a city/landscape to make it appear very appealing to certain movie-goers. Im sure that particular city shot, whenever it happens in the movie, will be a beautiful one, with the telltale tag of "Seoul-South Korea" on the bottom.

And trust me, that influences some people. There's an inevitable wish to visit that 'scene' in some minds...and thats what the Korean government is going for. That's the entire point.

The destruction shown, if any, won't matter because it's all fictional. What's bad policy is letting this information out...and for that, I suspect someone's getting the gulag.
 
pissedoffnobody;7985329 said:
The Lonious Monk;7985010 said:
fortyacres&amule;7984724 said:
Joss Whedon Says Edgar Wright's 'Ant-Man' Was 'Best Script Marvel Ever Had'

When director Edgar Wright left his longtime passion project Ant-Man over “creative differences” with Marvel, no one was more shocked than Joss Whedon. In a lengthy new Buzzfeed profile of Whedon, the Avengers: Age of Ultron director says that he still has no idea what happened between Wright and Marvel — but that Wright’s Ant-Man screenplay was one of the best he’d ever seen.

“I thought the script was not only the best script that Marvel had ever had, but the most Marvel script I’d read,” Whedon tells Buzzfeed. “I had no interest in Ant-Man. [Then] I read the script, and was like, Of course! This is so good! It reminded me of the books when I read them. Irreverent and funny and could make what was small large, and vice versa.”

“I don’t know where things went wrong,” he continues. “But I was very sad. Because I thought, This is a no-brainer. This is Marvel getting it exactly right. Whatever dissonance that came, whatever it was, I don’t understand why it was bigger than a marriage that seemed so right. But I’m not going to say it was definitely all Marvel, or Edgar’s gone mad! I felt like they would complement each other by the ways that they were different. And, uh, somethin’ happened.”

British filmmaker Wright, known for his “Cornetto trilogy” of Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, and The World’s End, began developing Ant-Man in 2006. Last May, Wright exited the project after eight years, with an official joint statement from Wright and Marvel citing “differences in their visions of the film.” Production resumed under new director Peyton Reed. Whedon is speaking more freely now that he’s stepping back from the Marvel universe, but last year, he gave a more understated show of solidarity for Wright: Tweeting out a picture of himself holding a Cornetto ice cream wrapper (below). Ant-Man is set to open on July 16.

That's all well and good, but the rumors are mostly that Wright didn't want Antman tied into the MCU at all. I don't care how good his script was, Marvel was right to tell him to kick rocks if he was inflexible on that.

It was going to be a 70s period pop art style influenced by Steranko that was a lot more comical but I think after Scott Pilgrim the studio questioned giving him that much free reign stylistically.

That sounds terrible. I don't even know why people are pining over this dude. I'm not a fan of his other movies, but even trying to be objective I just don't see how is style fits well with the MCU.
 
Ight so I peeped this beautiful helpin' of dopeness yesterday...

Hawk Eye redeems himself for that pathetic performance last film. The twins are good. James Spader as Ultron is absolutely amazin' though. Lotta Easter eggs. Only gripe that Ultron went down a lil too easily for my taste.

The Hulk/Widow thing was dope. The New Avengers at the end was dope. Can't wait for Infinity Gauntlet
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
5,348
Views
1,589
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…