The Lonious Monk;5810946 said:
waterproof;5810512 said:
The Lonious Monk;5810479[b] said:
Anyone claiming Africa was one big united happy continent before colonialism [/b]has no idea what they are talking about. In fact, they are railing against colonialism and don't even fully understand why it was bad. Colonialism didn't fuck Africa (or the Middle East for that matter) up because they drew lines dividing people. Colonialism fucked Africa up because they drew lines without acknowledging the lines that were already there. So basically you wound up with countries comprised of people who were at odds, and then those colonists left without regard to the damage they had done.
explain yourself, because i'm pretty damn sure I know what I am talking about, but let's throw out that one big happy continent because I think that misleading to the people, nobody you can quote ever said that Africa was one united happy continent but Africa was a united continent before the invaders enter the home land....
there's to many many instances even after the ancient times that Africa came together as one united defending the homeland
Yall act like it was thousands of tribes in Africa which it wasn't in the ancient times, it was black people that serve a common god that had a common tongue that spread the empire out and reached lands far away from the mother land.
Africans lived in peace with each other, sure there might been some infighting what family does not have it but when it came to the land they was united as one, protect the country as one followed the laws of the living god as one, they lived in peace under one rulership as one and brought riches from other land back home as one, they was united this is well known
Please give examples of times when different regions of Africa came together as one to defend the continent. I don't know how many tribes there were in ancient times, but Africa was never a single united people. I'm not sure where you even got that. Even if you just look at east Africa, Cush and Kemet were to separate nations for the most part. They even went back and forth conquering the other. If they weren't even one united group despite the fact that they had a shared origin, how do you figure that they were united with the peoples of west Africa or central Africa or south Africa. All these groups were different. I'm not saying they were constantly warring with each other, but they were more like the Native American nations than some one united front.
Here is one depiction of African nations before Colonialism.
First of all i dont have to, it's up to u be a student and do the research and study to find the truth, this information didnt just fall in my lap, i had to dig, research, find people, professor's, scholars and alot of reading to find a whole lot of information, if you want to find out then put the leg work in and dont be lazy. now with that being said.....
First of all The black race is descend from Ethiopia that where HAM and SHEM the black race is from, that map you show really dont mean shit because we are talking about AFRICA being united and there was a time AFRICA WAS UNITED AS ONE.........
WHY THAT MAP DONT MEAN SHIT, this is why, do you know at one time there was no tribes or africans in west, south, central and north west africa.
you know why, if you was studied you would of known that there was no access to those points because there was swamps. seas, lakes and rivers, forest, inhabitable terrain, why do you think africans traveled east into africa that is known as the middle east and india not into west africa, when the invasion happen and africans was fleeing some traveled through that area and thousands of thousands of thousands africans died going through the swamps, rivers, lakes and desert trying to escape..
NOW we are getting a picture that africans lived only in the eastern and north east of africa and those africans were the SONS OF HAM aka Hamites
here's an bibical map that shows the black nation of HAM and the black nation of shem, HAM THE FATHERS OF THE BLACK RACE OF HAM AND SHEM, HAM WAS ONLY IN NORTH EAST AFRICA AND SHEM WAS IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND INDIA BUT WITH THIS MAP YOU SEE KUSH WAS IN THE MIDDLE EAST ALSO
LUD, PHUT. MIZRAIM. CUSH, and CANAAN the sons of HAM was one empire that's the fathers of africa, they lived in peace, they worship the same. they looked the same, had the same heritage, THEY DROVE OUT EUROPEANS the early nomad cave man savages out of the land.. Cush gathered his brothers LUD. PHUT MIZRAIM and canan and drove out europeans many times, the texts is out there, the historical evidence is out there again is up to u to find it.....
also HAM conquered their cousin SHEM and all those names was apart of HAM and lived with HAM in peace
and YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT kush and khemet were separate nations i like how you state for the most part that tells me that you aint sure...
well let me tell you this EGYPT was a colony of KUSH, EGYPT states in their ancient texts that they are the sisters of KUSH, and egypt was allowed to prosper on their own but the only thing ethiopia told them not to allowed europeans into africa, lower egypt didnt like that so they wanted to break from upper egypt because upper egypt answered to ethiopia, ethipoia told upper egypt to bring back lower egypt, lower egypt let the greeks came in and when the greeks was making their power moves in started to make their way to upper egypt it was ethiopia with their brothers from Phut and Lud came to egypt and UNITED AS ONE BLACK AFRICAN NATION AND DROVE OUT THE INVADERS FROM EGYPT MULTIPLE TIMES...
so africa was united as one when it came to defend it's home, it's up to you to find it and search it's out there
