The more I learn about the human body..........

[Tha-Realist]

DoUwant2go2Heaven?

 

[KLICHE]

How can someone look me in the face and say the human heart was made from dirt? Dirt! The dirty human heart! From dirty!

I guess vagina was made from mudd! Wet gushy mudd.

I remember reading once someone say that the elements that make up dirt or earth say, are same as our make-up.... like those things on the chart you see in school say in science that has the little codes on it, forgot what it is called, sorry.

 

[fiat_money]

I remember reading once someone say that the elements that make up dirt or earth say, are same as our make-up.... like those things on the chart you see in school say in science that has the little codes on it, forgot what it is called, sorry.

The periodic table of elements?

A poster here had that theory, it was "sillyme".

 

[KLICHE]

The periodic table of elements?

A poster here had that theory, it was "sillyme".

Yeah that was the name of the table! lol Had a mental blank at it's best..

Yeah so wonder what people think of it say when viewed in that regard... that we not created from dirt itself, but share the same elements as dirt/earth does?

 

[geechee slim]

The Tyranosaurus evolved into a chicken.

I think people lack the ability to think critically. As far as evolution is concerned. But you believe what you want, not what you should. And that is arrogant.

 

[Huruma]

the more ridiculous the theory of evolution becomes. I mean how can anybody look at me with a straight face and tell me that the human heart evolved? I mean really? I mean like how can a person honestly look at me and tell me that the human heart evolved from some ancient primordial ooze? How did evolution "decide" that the heart needed a protective sac? Wheredeydodatat? LMAO! Evolution has to be in the top 10 of the most prepostrous ideas that man has ever conceived of. It's absolutely the most stupidest thing I have ever heard of, well that and the notion that God doesn't exist, which of course is the reason why evolution is even a theory to begin with. This world has gone absolutely mad. No wonder God said that in the last days men would forsake the truth for fables. God have mercy on the weak minded who have been and are being deceived by the serpent.

"1I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. 3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:1-4

Nobody decided that the heart needed a protective sac. Our hearts are the product of almost 4 billion years of natural selection. Prehistoric animals with genetic mutations that helped them to mate (and survive long enough to do so) were more likely to pass on those mutations than were animals without them. For whatever reasons, early mammals with a pericardium were more likely to survive which is why we have one.

Evolution is supported by observable evidence, creationism is not. The same method of reasoning that produced the computer you used to start this thread supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.

 

[judahxulu]

Nobody decided that the heart needed a protective sac. Our hearts are the product of almost 4 billion years of natural selection. Prehistoric animals with genetic mutations that helped them to mate (and survive long enough to do so) were more likely to pass on those mutations than were animals without them. For whatever reasons, early mammals with a pericardium were more likely to survive which is why we have one.

Evolution is supported by observable evidence, creationism is not. The same method of reasoning that produced the computer you used to start this thread supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.

computers can be replicated evolution cannot. you can literally witness a computer being built from scratch. u cannot witness an evolutionary process from its onset. people often use that computer/evolution analogy and its equally invalid and bogus each time. evolution is supported by A SPECIFIC INTERPRETATION of observable evidence. the evidence does not stand on its own with out certain presuppositions. keep it real.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

computers can be replicated evolution cannot. you can literally witness a computer being built from scratch. u cannot witness an evolutionary process from its onset. people often use that computer/evolution analogy and its equally invalid and bogus each time. evolution is supported by A SPECIFIC INTERPRETATION of observable evidence. the evidence does not stand on its own with out certain presuppositions. keep it real.

So you think we all came onto the Earth in our current form?

 

[Huruma]

computers can be replicated evolution cannot. you can literally witness a computer being built from scratch. u cannot witness an evolutionary process from its onset. people often use that computer/evolution analogy and its equally invalid and bogus each time. evolution is supported by A SPECIFIC INTERPRETATION of observable evidence. the evidence does not stand on its own with out certain presuppositions. keep it real.

The evolution of peppered moths has been observed within the last two hundred years. The earlier peppered moths were light colored which helped them to camouflage against light colored trees and lichens but pollution during the Industrial Revolution led to the extinction of the light colored moths and the selection of the dark colored moths who could camouflage against trees and lichens blackened by soot. How do you explain our sharing around 98% of our genes with chimpanzees (and being genetically related to every other biological organism on the planet)?

Look at how we domesticate plants and non-human animals. If we can selectively breed dogs that behave like friendly, juvenile wolves, why is it inconceivable that natural selection could produce species that are omnivorous, social, large, small, intelligent etc.? If natural selection can explain why strains of bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, why can't it also explain the strength of grizzly bears, the speed of cheetahs or the intelligence of humans?

 

[DarcSkies]

Oh and congratulations on another "im too stupid to understand science so it must be magic" thread.

 

[judahxulu]

So you think we all came onto the Earth in our current form?

Ima put it to ya like this playboy...People have theorized about some form of evolution or another since the greeks. the common descent/natural selection shit came from darwin. darwin was not a trained scientist. he had a bachelor of arts degree. yet, he is the major influence over modern biology. also, there are absolutely no fossil records that prove a supposed transition from apes into humans or a "common ancestor". there is simply no proof. i've actually been looking it up for a long time and i've found no hard evidence to support the ape-to-man paradigm.

out of all the archaeology digs , of all time, in all the world and not ONE skeleton to prove that shit beyond a shadow of a doubt???!! LMBAO

so to answer your original question...yes.

question for you...how does evolution explain the sudden jump in mans intellectual/social capacity in its proposed "tree of life"?

 

[judahxulu]

Oh and congratulations on another "im too stupid to understand science so it must be magic" thread.

you dumb bitch...where is the hard evidence that man has a common ancestor with or evolved from apes? just one fossil nigga...just one. stupid ass nigga. if it dont fit what youve been trained to believe then its got to be "magic".gtfoh...show and prove or shut the fuck up.

 

[judahxulu]

The evolution of peppered moths has been observed within the last two hundred years. The earlier peppered moths were light colored which helped them to camouflage against light colored trees and lichens but pollution during the Industrial Revolution led to the extinction of the light colored moths and the selection of the dark colored moths who could camouflage against trees and lichens blackened by soot. How do you explain our sharing around 98% of our genes with chimpanzees (and being genetically related to every other biological organism on the planet)?

Look at how we domesticate plants and non-human animals. If we can selectively breed dogs that behave like friendly, juvenile wolves, why is it inconceivable that natural selection could produce species that are omnivorous, social, large, small, intelligent etc.? If natural selection can explain why strains of bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, why can't it also explain the strength of grizzly bears, the speed of cheetahs or the intelligence of humans?

that 98% thing has been proven wrong for a couple decades now. you should study more. were genetically related because we come from the same source material.

the whole concept of natural selection is pseudo-science to justify atrocities committed on behalf of the "favoured races".
you did nothing to invalidate my post. anything can be used to explain anything as long as you have a PRESUPPOSITION.

im not suggesting that the phenomena you described happened by means of magic, but without hard evidence thats what youre suggesting.you would have much more examples than a moth

 

[ThaChozenWun]

Ima put it to ya like this playboy...People have theorized about some form of evolution or another since the greeks. the common descent/natural selection shit came from darwin. darwin was not a trained scientist. he had a bachelor of arts degree. yet, he is the major influence over modern biology. also, there are absolutely no fossil records that prove a supposed transition from apes into humans or a "common ancestor". there is simply no proof. i've actually been looking it up for a long time and i've found no hard evidence to support the ape-to-man paradigm.

out of all the archaeology digs , of all time, in all the world and not ONE skeleton to prove that shit beyond a shadow of a doubt???!! LMBAO

so to answer your original question...yes.

question for you...how does evolution explain the sudden jump in mans intellectual/social capacity in its proposed "tree of life"?

Ummm yea, playboy, they found the missing link in 08 or 09 I believe. Ida was the missing link for a long time and once it was found quite a bit of creationists then said "ok yes evolution did happen".

And you're still saying ape to man so honestly I don't believe you've looked into as you claim and then being that most of what Darwin theorized has been revised and changed by modern biologist yet you still have the dumb "It's all Darwinian" shit that your kind preach.

And it's simple, we were slower and not as advanced physically as other mammals, so throughout evolution we evolved to outsmart them because we could not outrun or outfight them. The mammals that were not able to evolve to outsmart or outrun them died out. There's a reason why over 99% of the worlds life has went extinct, not everything evolves to last and things die off and new things come to fruition. And nearly all of what we do in terms of intelligence is done by animals as well so the "intellectual" gap isn't really a great one. Other animals were able to kill the prey because of their ability, so naturally they would not have to evolve over millions of years to outsmart the prey they simply had it already.

According to your theory of evolution didn't happen because we are smart compared to animals that would make us animals and geniuses the real humans because they are often born levels and levels above the rest of us intellectually. So I mean how do you explain that? How do you explain the fossil records of different types of humans? Why do these records suggest physical and mental change over so many years? Why do we hold characteristics of so many animals? Why do we have tailbones? Why do pigs resemble us internally so accurately? Why can dogs be traced back to wolves, is that not a transformation both mentality wise and physical wise?

 

[judahxulu]

Ummm yea, playboy, they found the missing link in 08 or 09 I believe. Ida was the missing link for a long time and once it was found quite a bit of creationists then said "ok yes evolution did happen".

And you're still saying ape to man so honestly I don't believe you've looked into as you claim and then being that most of what Darwin theorized has been revised and changed by modern biologist yet you still have the dumb "It's all Darwinian" shit that your kind preach.

And it's simple, we were slower and not as advanced physically as other mammals, so throughout evolution we evolved to outsmart them because we could not outrun or outfight them. The mammals that were not able to evolve to outsmart or outrun them died out. There's a reason why over 99% of the worlds life has went extinct, not everything evolves to last and things die off and new things come to fruition. And nearly all of what we do in terms of intelligence is done by animals as well so the "intellectual" gap isn't really a great one. Other animals were able to kill the prey because of their ability, so naturally they would not have to evolve over millions of years to outsmart the prey they simply had it already.

According to your theory of evolution didn't happen because we are smart compared to animals that would make us animals and geniuses the real humans because they are often born levels and levels above the rest of us intellectually. So I mean how do you explain that? How do you explain the fossil records of different types of humans? Why do these records suggest physical and mental change over so many years? Why do we hold characteristics of so many animals? Why do we have tailbones? Why do pigs resemble us internally so accurately? Why can dogs be traced back to wolves, is that not a transformation both mentality wise and physical wise?

lol..nigga i reject your deposit. you think i aint read about that FOSSIL FRAUD Ida BEFORE I made my last post?

The exceptionally well-preserved fossil primate known as "Ida" is not a missing link as some have claimed, according to an analysis in the journal Nature.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8318643.stm

"Many lines of evidence indicate that Darwinius has nothing at all to do with human evolution."

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/03/confirmed-fossil-ida-is-not-a.html

Ida was the missing link for a long time and once it was found quite a bit of creationists then said "ok yes evolution did happen".

For real? nigga naw....

then to top off that blatant lie you cover up more bullshit with name-calling.

I don't believe you've looked into as you claim and then being that most of what Darwin theorized has been revised and changed by modern biologist yet you still have the dumb "It's all Darwinian" shit that your kind preach.

For real? Nigga naw..
LOL...Now its about belief huh? You dont believe nigga? How about Darwins and Mendels works found a happy little medium in the field of population genetics? I dont know who you think you fucking with but I'm not DoU..So did Darwin come up with natural selection and common descent or not? I would expect a straight answer but I know I'll just get some "doubletalking-superficial-scholar-you dont agree with me so u must be a dumb christian that believes in magic" presupposition shit that your kind preach!

Thats why you still havent addressed the fact (truthfully anyways since we got the Ida fiasco out the way) that there is a LACK of transitional fossil evidence.

And nearly all of what we do in terms of intelligence is done by animals as well so the "intellectual" gap isn't really a great one.

Ummmm...yeah. Having societies and cultures is not a big deal...Yeah shit like artistic expression, music, reading and writing came by necessity for us to be able to "outrun and outsmart" the animals....Nope the gaps not great at all. Well you damn near had me convinced thats true judging by that MONKEY ASS reasoning youre using..LOL

The fossil records of different types of humans? Which ones? Name 'em cause I bet I could debunk 'em like that Ida bullshit you tried to pull. We not only have the characteristics of other animals but we share more traits with the earth. We have almost the same water percentages, the same minerals that make soil "rich " are the ones our bodies need to survive, heat at our core keeps us going, the moon affects human bodies like it affects the tide etc, etc. We have tailbones (coccyx) as a supporting mechanism for muscles that make for comfortable sitting, for facilitating bowel and labor movements, supporting internal organs, and keeping the anus closed. How exactly does the internal organs of pigs justify theories of evolution? Do we come from pigs or primates? make up your fucking mind. So domestication of the grey wolf = evolution now? Thats fucking absurd! So is the pitbull an example of evolution too? GTFOH

 

[DarcSkies]

you dumb bitch...

where is the hard evidence that man has a common ancestor with or evolved from apes?

just one fossil nigga...just one. stupid ass nigga. if it dont fit what youve been trained to believe then its got to be "magic".gtfoh...show and prove or shut the fuck up.

u think that human beings were created by a magical sorcerer that lives in a magic place called "heaven" and I'm the dumb bitch? lmao Really only one fossil? So I guess hundreds of Neanderthal bones and skulls werent found in Europe. OK. idiot.

Your answer to everything concerning human evolution boils down to "A magical alien did it with fairy dust...YAY." Sorry but there are Sesame Street episode plots more complex than that bullshit. You are in no position to call anybody dumb. Especially since that "one fossil" is 100 percent more evidence than you Jesus/Allah freaks have to support your childish belief in Magic Spells, gods and gobblins.

I can explain it to you all day long but you're too stupid to get it so why bother? LOL @ asking me for evidence that you can look up on encyclopedia.com or at the local library. I'm not your teacher felon.

 

[judahxulu]

u think that human beings were created by a magical sorcerer that lives in a magic place called "heaven" and I'm the dumb bitch? lmao Really only one fossil? So I guess hundreds of Neanderthal bones and skulls werent found in Europe. OK. idiot.

Your answer to everything concerning human evolution boils down to "A magical alien did it with fairy dust...YAY." Sorry but there are Sesame Street episode plots more complex than that bullshit. You are in no position to call anybody dumb. Especially since that "one fossil" is 100 percent more evidence than you Jesus/Allah freaks have to support your childish belief in Magic Spells, gods and gobblins.

I can explain it to you all day long but you're too stupid to get it so why bother? LOL @ asking me for evidence that you can look up on encyclopedia.com or at the local library. I'm not your teacher felon.

youre a jackass. ive never expressed belief in some magic sorcerer or heaven. when have i EVER mentioned magical aliens? im the idiot but you think neanderthals are the missing link. if that was the case then why was everybody pussy getting wet when they thought "ida" was the transitional species? i dont believe in jesus, allah, magic spells, ghosts or goblins. im not asking u to teach me shit, junior. im exposing your idiocy, hypocrisy and total inability to cope with defending your beliefs which you try to pass off as facts. im hitting u bitch as niggas with fact after fact, reference after reference and all u can do is talk that old dumb shit. im showing and proving u niggas dont know what the fuck u talking 'bout. i might be a felon but at least i aint a black sock puppet for the values of the toubob. you aint nothing but the whitemans bitch....

[video=youtube;C5UNhKdh6oo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5UNhKdh6oo[/video]

 

[The GMW]

youre a jackass. ive never expressed belief in some magic sorcerer or heaven. when have i EVER mentioned magical aliens? im the idiot but you think neanderthals are the missing link. if that was the case then why was everybody pussy getting wet when they thought "ida" was the transitional species? i dont believe in jesus, allah, magic spells, ghosts or goblins. im not asking u to teach me shit, junior. im exposing your idiocy, hypocrisy and total inability to cope with defending your beliefs which you try to pass off as facts. im hitting u bitch as niggas with fact after fact, reference after reference and all u can do is talk that old dumb shit. im showing and proving u niggas dont know what the fuck u talking 'bout. i might be a felon but at least i aint a black sock puppet for the values of the toubob. you aint nothing but the whitemans bitch....

Just wanted to point out that you accuse people of being "the whiteman's bitch" for supporting evolution but you used a BBC link to support your arguments... in fact the very article you used as your reference is completely pro-evolution.

Here is another BBC link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/prehistoric_life/human/human_evolution/

 

[BiblicalAtheist]

my mole is huge

Careful, some of the males on the IC might get jealous that your mole is bigger than their penis.

 

[judahxulu]

Just wanted to point out that you accuse people of being "the whiteman's bitch" for supporting evolution but you used a BBC link to support your arguments... in fact the very article you used as your reference is completely pro-evolution.

Here is another BBC link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/prehistoric_life/human/human_evolution/

ive never said to anyone" you are the whiteman's bitch because you support evolution" so thats a false premise. also, i dont think you comprehend the point of my posts at all. the fact that a pro-evolution article made a liar out o the pro-evolution dude (chozenwun) is quite ironic to me and pretty fucking humorous to me. moreover, its not wise to jump into the midst of a conversation and assume that you will comprehend whats going on. the people ive addressed in this particular thread make it a point to insist that evolution = hard fact = no Creator and I disagree. There can simultaneously exist a form of creative intelligence and evolution. or it just might be one or the other. its all about whose report you believe, and thats the heart of the conflict here. the same posters mislabel and project the silliest aspects of christian mythology on any mode of spirituality expressed on this board. they tout their rationality and reason over our "primitive" faith and/or belief. Yet when someone like myself destroys their weak arguments they abandon their precious reasoning ans rationality and attempt to make appeals to ridicule. they even out right lie, as in the case of the frozenwun. those who's faith and belief rests in whats what in the realm of eurocentric scholarship, especially in lieu of a spiritual understanding - are essentially the whitemans bitch. its dependent on a worldview, not an opinion on a particular scientific theory.but that description is just an opinion. i understand if it made u feel better to cherrypick that part of my post and the bbc part in order to make yourself feel better. its weird, but i understand. Just remember 2 things :1) Darwins seminal work is fully titled On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859). Remember what was going on with africans and the "favoured" races at home and abroad during that epoch in time. 2) however much it may have been pruned and grafted, the "tree" of studying evolution has its roots in the works of Darwin. The biblical axiom "you cannot get a good fruit from a bad tree" holds true here.