NeighborhoodNomad.
New member
Young Stef;9057595 said:@NeighborhoodNomad It's Idiocracy because instead of science pursuing worthwhile admirable research such as cancer or Zika cures. A study was funded and reputable scientists were utilized to determine which women based solely on ethnic background possess the tightest pussies. Hence @IamJayPee stating science needs a new direction because dudes will simultaneously be pacified and emboldened to find out for themselves while women will vastly have their egos massively emboldened that she has a tight pussy or threatened that another woman has a tighter vagina than she has and women already compete amongst themselves. It will be a real version of Instagram IE a pissing contest for regular women to hold down their races or ethnic groups now and the racial undertones to further perpetuate white supremacy do not help either.
Appreciate the response.
“Comparison of vaginal shapes in Afro-American, Caucasian and Hispanic women as seen with Vinyl Polysiloxane Casting", is original title/goal of the study. The study was comparing the shapes of these women. And in comparing the shapes guess what else they found?! You got it. That wasn't the goal but that's what was found.
Goal:
"The goal of this project was to define baseline, nondistended dimensions of the vagina of women of reproductive age using noninvasive imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the optimal imaging modality for female pelvic organs because the images have excellent spatial resolution and inherently high soft tissue contrast (McCarthy and Vaqueno, 1986; Aronson et al., 1990; Barnhart et al., 2001, 2004b). A secondary goal was to explore the importance of the potential covariates to the dimensions of the human vagina including the impact of age, height, weight, gravity and parity. This information may help researchers optimize vaginal products and drug delivery."
"The dimensions and shape of the vagina are of great importance in medicine and surgery; however, there appears to be no single way to characterize the size and shape of the human vagina. Although differences exist between women, there are few covariates associated with these differences. There does not appear to be large variation in the dimensions of the vagina within the same woman. Given the large range in the dimensions noted, it is most likely that one size for a vaginal device will not fit all women (Mauck et al., 2004). Prior research has shown that using a single size for fitting two cervical caps leads to the correct fit in only 33% of women. Moreover, it is possible that one volume of a gel intended to cover the vaginal epithelium may not be appropriate for all women. This information can be used to better design various devices used in the vagina. We have previously proved that deployment of a potential microbicide gel in the upper and lower vagina is affected by factors such as ambulation, time since insertion, volume and product (Barnhart et al., 2005). Baseline vaginal dimension may also be an important factor."
http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/6/1618.full
When approaching things medically one size doesn't fit all. That's very important to know.
And just because we may have a group of scientists studying the specificities of the human body, doesn't mean there aren't other groups studying cancers and cures. Everyone has a position to play and a little info to give.
How does any of this perpetuate White supremacy?