Neophyte Wolfgang
New member
Am I the only one that thinks Science fell off and needs a new direction?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I Am Jay Pee;9056150 said:Am I the only one that thinks Science fell off and needs a new direction?
I Am Jay Pee;9056150 said:Am I the only one that thinks Science fell off and needs a new direction?
Chilla ;9056696 said:I Am Jay Pee;9056150 said:Am I the only one that thinks Science fell off and needs a new direction?
Idiocracy hit the nail on the head
2stepz_ahead;9056576 said:cant women have operations to have they coochie shaped differently
the outside aint what i need to be tight.....
how that shit when you in it....
shit most houses have small doors but spacious as hell when you get inside it
Explain why/how this is idiocracy.
Kat;9057236 said:Are they studying the vaginas of virgins or what? That's the only way I could see this type of study being legitimate.
I Am Jay Pee;9057157 said:Explain why/how this is idiocracy.
Are you one of those pseudo intellects who think because its a scientific study its correct and can't be question?
NeighborhoodNomad. ;9057257 said:Kat;9057236 said:Are they studying the vaginas of virgins or what? That's the only way I could see this type of study being legitimate.
All of them were sexually active at the time of the study, and it was a mixture of Women who had never given birth, Women who have only given birth once and Women with multiple births.
How would them being virgins legitimize the study or results?
Kat;9057344 said:First of all I made no mention of any particular race of women, I just feel virgins would be the true indicator of a woman's "natural" shape.
LPast;9057441 said:I think she is trying to say her ish tighter than black women...smh