Steve Harvey takes an L (along with most of you people)

[Go figure...]

http://www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html

But first consider this. If a person opposes even the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence can be rationalized or explained away. It is like if someone refuses to believe that people have walked on the moon, then no amount of information is going to change their thinking. Photographs of astronauts walking on the moon, interviews with the astronauts, moon rocks...all the evidence would be worthless, because the person has already concluded that people cannot go to the moon.

When it comes to the possibility of God's existence, the Bible says that there are people who have seen sufficient evidence, but they have suppressed the truth about God.1 On the other hand, for those who want to know God if he is there, he says, "You will seek me and find me; when you seek me with all your heart, I will be found by you."2 Before you look at the facts surrounding God's existence, ask yourself, If God does exist, would I want to know him?

Romans 1:19-21 (New International Version, ©2010)
19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

 

[Go figure...]

Bruh, you're spamming the thread. If you're incapable of forming an argument with your own words, step your game up.

At least you're citing your sources, tho.

lol.....no answers now huh

 

[Disciplined InSight]

So what makes his deceleration that he is God any more valid than the deceleration of Godhood by religious icons of different faiths halfway across the globe? You have generations of people taught to believe that the Buddah was God incarnate. They have their own religious history, creation myths, etc. and would reject your beliefs off the authority of their Holy books when presented against the argument that the Abrahamic faith is the only way to salvation. So what gives the Bible (which is a compilation works chosen by religious and political figures with varying motives) precedent over 1000's of other written works that are "Divinely" inspired?

Well, that Buddha and the followers belief. I have nothing against what they believe. I believe what I, MYSELF believe. The scriptures of YHWH have been tested, tried and been attempted to get destroyed and discredited through time and still stands..even after the apostles, prophets were killed off by those political figures who didn't believe but used it for their own selfish gain (Rome, being one of the first political powers of that era plus i.e. the Catholic religion).

The majority of events in the Bible has loads of archology backing it up, from the predictions of the Revelation of John, Daniel and Ezekiel which the majority of those have already came true. You need to do some research. Just because those religious and political figures misunderstood and mistranslated the Bible for their own selfish and varying motives, doesn't make the originality of the scriptures invalid. I can tell you never read the bible yourself, you're probably just hearing from what other non-believers told you.

LOL, stacks. Rakim, BDK, and G. Rap are all wack rappers, and you know that. Listen to more Wayne and Drake.

Lol @ you liking POP rappers. One that's possibly a closeted homosexual and another who is an off key singing Jewish simp.

With that post itself, you just discredit yourself. ANY opinion you give in this topic on any other topic especially when it comes to Hip Hop, is IRRELEVANT and needs to be ignored.

 

[Disciplined InSight]

niggas gettin their google game on i see

couldn't make arguments themselves, gotta go borrow them from other people

and those aren't even good arguments either, LOL

Fool you been Googling shit. Stop being so hypocritical.

 

[Go figure...]

There is no proof that God exists

by Matt Slick

Sometimes atheist assert that there is no proof God exists. The only problem is that an atheist cannot logically make that claim.

In order to state there is no proof for God's existence, the atheist would have to know all alleged proofs that exist in order to then state that there is no proof for God's existence. But, since he cannot know all things, he cannot logically state there is no proof for God's existence.

At best, an atheist can only state that of all the alleged proofs he has seen thus far, none have worked. He could even say he believes there are no proofs for God's existence. But then, this means there is the possibility that there is a proof or proofs out there, and that he simply has not yet encountered one.

Nevertheless, if there was a proof that truly did prove God's existence, would the atheist be able to accept it, given that his presuppositions are in opposition to the existence of God? In other words, given that the atheist has a presuppositional base that there is no God, in order for him to accept a proof for God's existence, he would have to change his presuppositional base. This is not easy to do, and would involve a major paradigm shift in the belief structure of the atheist. Therefore, an atheist is presuppositionally hostile to any proofs for God's existence, and is less likely to be objective about such attempted proofs.

 

[Go figure...]

http://carm.org/atheism

LOL dis dude arguin against atheism the same way atheist argue toward christians. shits hilarious.

 

[Go figure...]

Christian morality is based on might makes right.

by Matt Slick

This is an objection often raised by atheists. Many think that Christianity teaches that God arbitrarily assigns rules for moral behavior, and that his ability to enforce those rules is the basis of right and wrong. But this is not the Christian position. God certainly has the ability to enforce the rules he reveals to us, but what is morally right with God is due to his character, not his power. The reason it is wrong to lie is because God cannot lie (Titus 1:2). Therefore, right and wrong are not determined by God's ability to be stronger than anyone else. Right and wrong are determined by God revealing his own immutable, holy essence.

Whenever an atheist accuses Christian theology, and in particular the Christian God, of determining morality from "might makes right," he is misrepresenting the Christian faith. But, this is often the case with atheists who fail to seriously study what they criticize.

 

[Go figure...]

mistakes christians make when dailoguing with atheists (LOL)

http://carm.org/mistakes-christians-make-when-dialoguing-atheists

 

[thedesolateone]

matt slick got ethered by matt dillahunty

 

[KidLife10200]

God doesn't exist you dumbass niggas.

 

[Coo Coo Cal's Beanie]

actually the part @ 2:04 was specifically referring to WHITE people. There was another study about that. IDK if anyone said that. I aint readin this whole thread

 

[glowy]

So we are not related?

I don't even think this is a hominid.

http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhTpftNsh6ABRrv5P4

^^Primate eats and masturbates.

 

[Coo Coo Cal's Beanie]

So we are not related?

I don't even think this is a hominid.

http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhTpftNsh6ABRrv5P4

^^Primate eats and masturbates.

Black people arent. It was a study showing that it was similar DNA in the "monkeys" and Europeans, not Africans. Crackas aint gone put that on tv tho. It was on msnbc website tho

 

[Disciplined InSight]

God doesn't exist you dumbass niggas.

Prove it.........

 

[Disciplined InSight]

Pac is the best rapper of all time, but that's a different topic. I could careless what they do on their spare time. Doesn't Stacks got Guru on his list and he's homosexual? Hypocrisy

You have no proof of Guru being a homo...but Tupac had questionable red flags in his career. Go figure.

 

[Knives Amilli]

doesnt clear shit up....just says it cannot be explained n doesnt need to be............??

and i didnt say "an omnipotent spirit......." makes more sense....thats why i wrote "yall just as crazy as christians."

in ur argue against God, u guys argue for proof and evidence like we're supposed to have all the answers yet u guys dont have all the answers so how is it right to claim religion is not valid because not all of it can be proven? much like science, when u figure sumthin out....u later on might come to realize it was actually another way and disprove ur own facts. how can u rely solely on science?



my point is not that science is WRONG. what i believe is that God is what makes it work.

check this one too:

http://www.everystudent.com/features/isthere.html

And that's actually the really, really great thing about science. IT ALLOWS FOR ERROR. Scientists love it when they're wrong because 9/10 it means they missed something, a variable was left out or some other. Once said variable has been accounted for and factored in, the potential for new breakthroughs increases by quite a lot. Science never claims to have all the answers, it just stands as the most logical, unbiased means of obtaining the answers.

Religion on the other hand is absolute. Never changes. Can never be wrong. "God did it, we don't care how or why or where's the evidence but fuck he did it, end of story."

And if you read the blog, he said in regards to the Big Bang Theory (which BTW primarily based on the fact AND seeks to explain WHY the universe is constantly expanding) asking it to explain the origin of life, what the forces of the universe were when they were compacted together etc. is asking too much of it. That's a double standard seeing as how the theory of gravity doesn't explain where mass came from. There are other theories (which are still in their infancy mind you, we can only know so much at this point) whose purpose is to explain the first life, what the universe was prior to the big bang and other shit.

 

[fiat_money]

...

...

LOL. That pic makes not one reference to atheism.

 

[thedesolateone]

whoever said buddah is considered a god by buddhist has no idea wtf they are talkin about

 

[fiat_money]

LOL. That pic makes not one reference to atheism.

For comparison purposes:

 

[Calii Comfort]

whoever said buddah is considered a god by buddhist has no idea wtf they are talkin about

this^ i just saw that too.