Statue of Liberty = Lucifer's shrine

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
CrownChakra;2059513 said:
I meant they were rip offs. Inspired from. plagiarized whatever. The statue of liberty came from The colossus of Rhodes like Lucifer came from Prometheus.

All of them still represent light one way or another.

Word? So, to what point does an artist's inspiration turn into fodder for conspiracy theorists?
 
Last edited:
With the toe bone connected

to the foot bone,

and the foot bone connected

to the ankle bone,

and the ankle bone connected

to the leg bone.

With the leg bone connected

to the knee bone,

and the knee bone connected

to the thigh bone,

and the thigh bone connected

to the hip bone.

With the hip bone connected

to the back bone,

and the back bone connected

to the neck bone,

and the neck bone connected

to the head bone,

The toe bone is directly connected to the head bone! O noz!
 
Last edited:
major pain;2059520 said:
Word Bartholdi and Lafayette gave George Washington the statue of liberty? Really? In 1865?

No, you asked who were the masons on each side.

George Washington was the founding father and Freemason.

Lincoln and James Buchanan were ones too
 
Last edited:
CrownChakra;2059573 said:
No, you asked who were the masons on each side.

George Washington was the founding father and Freemason.

Lincoln and James Buchanan were ones too

Say what?....

CrownChakra;2059432 said:
Yea, French Freemasons just happened to hand the statue to American Freemasons. No conspiracy at all

major pain;2059471 said:
Who exactly are you considering freemasons on each side?

Pretty obvious I meant who YOU were referring to with "French Freemasons just happened to hand the statue to American Freemasons." Lets just skip to the good part. French Freemasons did not hand the statue to American Freemasons.
 
Last edited:
CrownChakra;2057028 said:
marx2.jpg


Karl Marx

This is a lie...karl marx was not a mason.
 
Last edited:
Hip-Hop is and always was part of the illuminati. Check out the symbolism. The "hidden stance." The B in B-boy really stands for Bavarian.

bboy_stance.jpg


B-Boy_Stance.png


tumblr_ldy9r1LdzH1qfa0gwo1_400.jpg


pose_big+b+boy+stance.jpg
 
Last edited:
Marx was an atheist.

Marx would not even be allowed to join the Masons, since they are basically Dungeons and Dragons for adults who actually believe in Dungeons and Dragons in real life, LOL
 
Last edited:
major pain;2059262 said:
What makes you believe prince hall masonry is inferior?

because whites are more dug in and if it anything that is really going on...trust me...groups of black people will be the last to know

so its not about being inferior...its more about having access to limited knowledge
 
Last edited:
pralims;2060064 said:
because whites are more dug in and if it anything that is really going on...trust me...groups of black people will be the last to know

so its not about being inferior...its more about having access to limited knowledge

Sir, you are grossly misinformed as to how masonry works. You are assuming there is "something" going on. As a point of interest, there are black people in mainstream lodges in every state. I understand some people's natural skepticism of the evil white man, but some things are taken wayyyy too far.
 
Last edited:
Disciplined InSight;2058738 said:
Thank you for dropping these jewels to those who are in the dark.

Retardation running rampant in the SL, SURPRISE SURPRISE!!

Many theories have been presented as to why Napoleon is traditionally depicted with his hand in his waistcoat. Some of these theories include: that he had a stomach ulcer, he was winding his watch, he had an itchy skin disease, that in his era it was impolite to put your hands in your pockets, he had breast cancer, he had a deformed hand, he kept a perfumed sachet in his vest that he'd sniff surreptitiously, and that painters don't like to paint hands. A simpler and more elegant theory is contained in an article entitled, "Re-Dressing Classical Statuary: The Eighteenth-Century 'Hand-in-Waistcoat' Portrait." by Arline Miller. Art Bulletin (College Art Association of America), Vol. 77, No.2, March 1995, p.45-64. Miller points out that the 'hand-in' portrait type appeared with "relentless frequency" during the eighteenth century and became almost a cliched pose in portrait painting. The pose was used so often by portraitists that one was even accused of not knowing how to paint hands. "In real life," Miller observes, "the 'hand-held-in' was a common stance for men of breeding." Miller goes on to give many examples of this posture in painted portraits dating from the early and middle 1700s, well before Napoleon's birth. In 1738 Francois Nivelon published A Book Of Genteel Behavior describing the "hand-in-waistcoat" posture as signifying "manly boldness tempered with modesty." Miller says that the hidden hand was a feature of some statues of the ancient Greeks and Romans and that later painters based their poses on classical models. The pose was recommended by certain classical writers as a useful posture for orators. Aeschines of Macedon (390-331 B.C.), an actor, orator and founder of a school of rhetoric, who wrote an important book on oratory, postulated that speaking with one's arm outside the toga was considered ill-mannered. A number of textbooks on oratory published in the eighteenth century, following Aeschines, recommended this gesture. Although Miller doesn't mention it, it is possible that the great French actor Talma, who reportedly trained Napoleon in Imperial comportment, may have been familiar with these works.

Gunned up and clapped quicc.
 
Last edited:
I am a Mason... 90% of what you hear is bullshit. But we will never fight these rumors. As they are highly amusing. Gives us something to talk and laugh about in our meetings. lol
 
Last edited:
KingRegi;2060150 said:
I am a Mason... 90% of what you hear is bullshit. But we will never fight these rumors. As they are highly amusing. Gives us something to talk and laugh about in our meetings. lol

No homo at having meetings where females aren't allowed. I'm more inclined to believe that freemasonry is a secret, safe gathering place for homosexuals who don't want to be outted in real life than a bunch of niggas who actually control shit.
 
Last edited:
PLASTIC RULES;2060158 said:
No homo at having meetings where females aren't allowed. I'm more inclined to believe that freemasonry is a secret, safe gathering place for homosexuals who don't want to be outted in real life than a bunch of niggas who actually control shit.

Its a good thing its neither, but hey what do I know.
 
Last edited:
major pain;2059440 said:
1st bolded.. Conclusive evidence obviously.

2nd bolded.. Explain how the Statue of Liberty is a rip off of Prometheus other than the flame? One is a man one is a woman. Prometheus has no history of carrying a tablet. Prometheus is "stole" fire or "light" from Zeus or "God" and gave it to mankind. Liberty is assumed to be given to all people by God. You are making some bold leaps without further analyzing things.

You can tell that dude is retarded since the Statue of Liberty is actually derived from statues of the classical goddess Nike.
 
Last edited:
:gotdayum @ the Olympics actually being one huge ceremony dedicated to Satan/Lucifer.

All them torch-bearers are obviously devil-worshippers.
 
Last edited:
UPTOWN (CONNEXX);2058663 said:
im with crown on this one

that nigga holdin the atlas right across the street from the church is real

im not say freemason are some special group of people that know magical things we dont and have encounter aliens etc .... but you cant deny the placement in the latter part of history. and smh at the dude taking that dumb ass pic with his dads freemason flag in the background. first off his hand wasnt completely hidden like the others. furthermore you being associated with freemasons and not knowing shit is just a fail on your part, doesnt mean that they dont have shit going on. furthermore the way i understand it is that the illuminati infiltrated the freemasons ... so you simply lose on every lvel of this discussion

dont get it twisted, most of those shows etc ARE garbage, but that doesnt mean you cant find a gem or two in there. even anciet aliens is atleast good enough to make you question some things, and see amazing structure etc that you may never get to travel to see

LMAO damn busted me!!! And ummm that's my JACKET not a flag buddy!!!! Anyway as always it humors me to see outsiders that have never stepped foot in a Lodge nor been involved in any of our LEGITIMATE rituals suddenly become experts at what we do and what we are.. But carry on cause it does make for interesting reading.. knock knock knock... who comes here? lmaoooo
 
Last edited:
major pain;2059262 said:
What makes you believe prince hall masonry is inferior?

Come on major... you know why.. the slave mentality still remains in the thought process of some folks.. if it ain't white it ain't right you know that lol...
 
Last edited:
See this thread is a great example of ignorance trumping intellect... There are at least 3 Freemasons here, each more than willing to answer legitimate questions as best we can, but instead of asking questions most of you prefer to try and bolster these asinine theories that you've developed from watching a few youtube videos, history channel and of course some stuff your 33rd degree uncle told you once when you were six. Bro's let's stop defending the Craft against some of these stupid unfounded arguments. They are gonna believe what they want to believe regardless... Those with legitimate interest I welcome you to ask away but I'll no longer participate in the tomfoolery part lol..
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
146
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…