soul rattler;2059408 said:
I don't speak on things in which I'm ignorant of. Does it just make you feel better to think that you know more about a conspiracy theory than anyone else? Cause all you're saying is "I know something you don't know therefore I refuse to engage you in a conversation that disproves what I supposedly know".
i asked you questions and then had to explain the answer ... why couldnt you answer right from the beginning?? furthermore, i have never spoken my beliefs once in this thread. yet again speaking on what you do not know. your problem is that you have a problem with those who dont follow everything you do on face value. i pointed out that you just brushing it off is silly considering those who dont believe it still respect it. that is all
it has already been agreed upon by me and you in this very conversation that it cant be proven or disproven, so what are you talking about my dude LOL ur hilarious
major pain;2059413 said:
So, feel free to explain how being a person in power and being a freemason have anything to do with this supposed "infiltration" other than people making up stuff out of thin air. Ever considered that there are many more people in power that are NOT freemasons than there are? Talk about the facts and not speculation. I've had many discussions in this forum regarding this same subject, so this "do your research" shit is the normal cop-out people come up with when they know they cant prove what they are saying.
hmmmm lets see ... when did the illuminati first supposedly infiltrate the free masons??? who has been the most powerful people in the world since then?? how many US presidents out of the nearly 50 we have had were masons??
im done with yall two LOL THIS IS BASIC KNOWLEDGE THAT WE SHOULDNT EVEN HAVE TO DISCUSS IN THIS CONVERSATION IF YOU ARE KNOWLEDGABLE ABOUT THE SUBJECT. HOW COULD YALL ASK SUCH STUPID QUESTIONS?? IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT YOU WOULDNT EVEN ASK THESE QUESTIONS!!! LOL this is proof that you just simply chose to not believe it. you did not research and then come up with a conclusion LOL. at this point, yall are just saving face because i pointed out your ignorance while you were lol'ing
this is like arguing micheal jordan with someone who has never even seen a basketball game. its like you're saying MJ is just some guy who has popular sneakers, then when i say "well it can be argued who the greatest player ever is, but MJ is much more than someone who just had popular, successful selling sneakers" .... then you say " well prove it" ... then i laugh and say " he won 6 nba championships !! who doesnt know that"
that is what this discussion has become. you simply dont know what you're talking about. you never researched both sides of the story, you were sonned into your beliefs just like a child born into a religious family LOL smh