Undefeatable;9466924 said:This is why people who don't really follow politics should not try to act all knowledgeable every four years.
Follow politics, economics, etc. or just sit down and shut up.
If you had followed politics, you wouldn't think that the Democratic party is as indifferent to blacks like the Republicans are supposed to be. (The Republicans are actually not indifferent, but positively hostile, but nevermind.)
For example, perhaps until recently, what was the single biggest civil rights issue that black elected officials, intellectuals and other elites did the most to promote or defend?
Without question, it was or is keeping affirmative action.
If it wasn't for the Democratics, affirmative action would be long gone. It is the party that has gone out of its way to defend AA.
Another issue: Enforcing anti-discrimination laws. Under Democratic presidents, there is vigorous enforcement of such laws. Under Republican presidents, enforcement lags. Hell, Republican presidents have been known to be ambivalent if not outright hostile towards anti-discrimination laws. This was one of the main charges against Clarence Thomas when he was nominated to the Supreme Court, that he did the bidding of Reagan administration officials in not vigorously enforcing civil rights laws.
I could on. More definitely needs to be done. But if the Democrats were anything like the Republicans, there is no doubt that blacks would be worse off. The Democratic Party has done far more for blacks in the past 60 decades than have Republicans.
stopped reading..
didnt AA benefit white bitches or some shit a studied showed!!?