Maximus Rex
New member
phantom0900;2017773 said:Historically, powerful or influential men have always had concubines or mistresses because they could and wanted too.
Some people need more than one person to keep them emotionally, intellectually, and sexually satisfied, male or female. Your wife might make you feel warm fuzzy and loving and hold down the household, but Pam in the office might inspire you to make beautiful business moves, Toni in the gym might bring out that competitive nature, and Ashley might be the only chick that can check you.
All these relationships could be sexual, with a specific level of fulfillment his wife might not be meeting. Cats had harems for 1000s of years, ran empires, towns, and corporations in this manner, and it was effective. I'm just putting a modern twist on it.
Its definitely not for everyone, but not everyone is meant to be in monogamous relationship, and as long as all parties are up front and honest, to each their own.
Before your forgetting the historical context for polygyny in those times. Women needed men for survival purposes. A women couldn't go out hunt and provide security for herself. So she needed to be married off to have those things provided for. Plus there was no feminism. What the dude said was law and the "bet not," say otherwise. While I do believe that polygyny should be legal, it's not a relationship I would indugle in nor would I recommed it.
Last edited: