a.mann;8470278 said:The Lonious Monk;8470238 said:a.mann;8470180 said:The Lonious Monk;8469953 said:a.mann;8469940 said:But the officer initiated the physical conflict.....not the kid
I'm not sure why this that is being dismissed,other than because it was a black kid that was involved
I just explained that. The officer was authorized to take her down in that situation regardless of whether she was getting physical or not. Basically you can't just refuse to leave the class. If you do, the police can escort you out by force.
And there are cops in the schools down there because of attacks on teachers by students. So now they have cops assigned to each school to avoid that kind of thing.
"bruh...."
* Citizens are NOT generally required by law to obey police.
* Police do NOT have general legal authority over citizens.
* Police do NOT have any right to assault a citizen.
* Police are NOT the power responsible for punishing citizens
*Police CAN NOT seize citizens personal property without proper warrant of just cause(court issued)
I'm not sure what you're talking about, but that cop was authorized to use force to remove her from the classroom. None of that shit you said changes that. Its fair for you not to like it, but randomly spouting stuff doesn't change or help anything.
If this officer truly had such authority....
WHY WAS HE FIRED???
Excessive force maybe...
The real reason we know is the dept. Don't want that headache and blowback