Samuel L Jackson: Hollywood Avoids Real Issues of Racism

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
S. Jackson is right.

We need a new Spike Lee that make movied about things that still going on in America.

I wish i saw a movie about segreagation driven black self hate.

I want to see a real movie about that police brutality.

I want to see a movie about skin bleaching.

In a nutshell I WANT MORE. If Hollywood has the nerve to make movies about Hitler, then lets go deeper into Black America.
 
Since when was QT, Spike Lee. Everybody got their own lane. Nothing that QT has ever done suggests he's capable of making or producing the kinda film you're suggesting.

And Tyler Perry has gotten rich off of producing the fluffy crap that the masses eat up. Doing the same thing with real historical movies isn't as easy. Tell me, which has sold more ringtone rap or conscious rap. Who's more famous Drake or Dead Prez?
 
He made good points, but where was his criticism of Quentin? He defended Quentin against Spike, but questions McQueen?

Something ain't right about that, brother....
 
fortyacres&amule;6739587 said:
But he would rather coon in Django Unchained

Whatever nigga

Yet he has done other roles where he played strong black man. its called range. WTF u talkin bout.

and dont act like there weren't coon house niggas that acted like the one he played in Django. cant avoid history

 
Last edited:
I'd like to see someone tackle the issue of racism in Hollywood, and mainstream media. Make a movie about that. Be direct
 
I like how ppl say "there were characters like Uncle Ruckus in history"...

What historical literature suggest this? Were there cases of Stockholm syndrome? Perhaps

where are these historical narratives describing the full coon characters like Steven, Uncle Ruckus?
 
1of1;6739898 said:
I'd like to see someone tackle the issue of racism in Hollywood, and mainstream media. Make a movie about that. Be direct

27060-b-bamboozled.jpg


 
The Lonious Monk;6739856 said:
Since when was QT, Spike Lee. Everybody got their own lane. Nothing that QT has ever done suggests he's capable of making or producing the kinda film you're suggesting.

And Tyler Perry has gotten rich off of producing the fluffy crap that the masses eat up. Doing the same thing with real historical movies isn't as easy. Tell me, which has sold more ringtone rap or conscious rap. Who's more famous Drake or Dead Prez?

Well you have a point if sam was just in it for the money

But if he sincerely wanted to make a movie that tackles race and inspire change he could do it... with his connects and pedigree Im sure with enough will power he could go the independent route and get it done...like a dead prez

And qt has his lane...but we're talking about how sam contradicted himself...by accepting his role in django he became apart of the problem of which hes now rallying against...I dunno made these last 2, 3 yrs his views have changed
 
The Lonious Monk;6739827 said:
Allergens;6739810 said:
then build a film studio with other wealthy black actors and tell the story

It's not that simple. You can make the studio, but can you market the movies and will they be successful? George Lucas already spoke on it. He said that making good movies that show more of the history and truth for blacks and other minorities isn't hard because no one wants to tell those stories. It's hard because they believe they can't sell those stories to the general movie going public which is mostly white in this country and don't give a fuck about the real truth of the history of minorities.

I can understand George Lucas having that excuse, this shit ain't his problem, and he can't relate to whats at stake.

But black hollywood... they should be looking pass that.

Going with GL's logic, a black film staff won't do it because they can't make money off it. Given the state of things, and the fact that they know shit's bad out here, for them to let money be an issue, when they are already millionaires 5 times over, continuing to go along with hollywoods bullshit, and they won't tell the truth cause it has no monetary value?

If the only thing stopping them is not benefiting financially, they are sell outs. If they are concerned with appeasing white folks after all this bullshit, they are coons. If they don't give a fuck about staying true to their own roots and telling the truth, they are snakes.

So what if they don't make millions or the film isn't a worldwide blockbuster. This is just the right thing to do, cause it won't happen if we don't make it happen. Fuck the money, niggas having price tags is part of the reason we're in this shit.
 
Disciplined InSight;6739780 said:
fortyacres&amule;6739587 said:
But he would rather coon in Django Unchained

Whatever nigga

A valid point is made here...

Debatable. Django wasn't intended to have much of a message as far as I can see. It was just a gory story, like all of Tarantino's work. 12 years a slave seems like it was trying to have a message, and sam is just criticizing the relevance that message has for the 21st century.

 
this movie should make blacks look at themselves and change their mental thinking

hollywood mocked us for too long.now it's time for blacks to start making movies and shows that wont have us looking stupid.not all blacks live in the ghetto.not all of us kiss the ass of white people etc..
 
BlackJerryMaguire;6740850 said:
MR.CJ;6739642 said:
What about a nat turner movie?

Ppl always say this but. ....... . He wasn't successful. U know that right?

Nat Turner's Rebellion was a slave rebellion that took place in Southampton County, Virginia, during August 1831 Led by Nat Turner, rebel slaves killed anywhere from 55 to 65 people, the highest number of fatalities caused by any slave uprising in the American South. The rebellion was put down within a few days, but Turner survived in hiding for more than two months afterwards

Harriet Tubman didn't free every slave. Was she not successful?
 
BIGG WILL;6740876 said:
BlackJerryMaguire;6740850 said:
MR.CJ;6739642 said:
What about a nat turner movie?

Ppl always say this but. ....... . He wasn't successful. U know that right?

Nat Turner's Rebellion was a slave rebellion that took place in Southampton County, Virginia, during August 1831 Led by Nat Turner, rebel slaves killed anywhere from 55 to 65 people, the highest number of fatalities caused by any slave uprising in the American South. The rebellion was put down within a few days, but Turner survived in hiding for more than two months afterwards

Harriet Tubman didn't free every slave. Was she not successful?

Whites then killed over 200 slaves and passed laws that made slaves lives worse.

And you're not gonna sit there and say harriet Tubman was unsuccessful cmon.

North America never had a successful slave rebellion anyway
 
what? You sure the author didn't change some words around and shit? Cause this is the same dude on a interview for when he did Django Unchained, trying to get the interviewer to say nigga. Now the flip flop...I'm moving along here.

And yall niggas need to start putting this race shit in its proper forum...R and R. Shit is getting mad old. This is all you can talk about? Feminism and racism? You have nothing else to offer to the community besides that? Or yall don't want to deal with janklow's ass??? lol
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
58
Views
3
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…