rich white guy rapes his son and 3 year old daugther... gets probation.

[StoneColdMikey]

I really hope this becomes big. Put this bitxh head on a stick

 

[7figz]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

 

[mryounggun]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

 

[bossdon201]

I literally typed mad shit in response to this and stopped and just deleted it all. Can't be surprised by these crakkkers. There will never be justice in stolen land

 

[7figz]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

 

[KingFreeman]

Judge must've been paid off.

 

[mryounggun]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

Because they play a part in the shit. I'm sure the lawyer has a moral compass that says 'This man raped an infant and a toddler. He needs to be in prison.'. But that trust fund money made him turn against that and make a case for leniency.

 

[Stew]

Where the uncles at. They shouldve beat this nigga with a bat by now.

 

[mryounggun]

Judge must've been paid off.

Doubt it.

 

[7figz]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

Because they play a part in the shit. I'm sure the lawyer has a moral compass that says 'This man raped an infant and a toddler. He needs to be in prison.'. But that trust fund money made him turn against that and make a case for leniency.

All lawyers are doing is presenting the best defense they can for their client, they don't have any power at all. What would the shit be like if there weren't lawyers ?

You wouldn't want a MF to defend you if you were going to court ?

Judgement, in the court system, is supposed to be delegated - to only the judges and jury. If you had every other person along the pipeline passing their own moral judgement on the accused - the system would be even less effective.

Picture the cop saying "Hey I think you're a rapist, so I'll just ...." or the bailiff, or C.O., court reporter, etc....

The lawyer is supposed to use the law (and evidence), not his morals, to do his job.

 

[Black_Privilege]

It's his kids let him raise them how he wants

 

[mryounggun]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

Because they play a part in the shit. I'm sure the lawyer has a moral compass that says 'This man raped an infant and a toddler. He needs to be in prison.'. But that trust fund money made him turn against that and make a case for leniency.

All lawyers are doing is presenting the best defense they can for their client, they don't have any power at all. What would the shit be like if there weren't lawyers ?

You wouldn't want a MF to defend you if you were going to court ?

Judgement, in the court system, is supposed to be delegated - to only the judges and jury. If you had every other person along the pipeline passing their own moral judgement on the accused - the system would be even less effective.

Picture the cop saying "Hey I think you're a rapist, so I'll just ...." or the bailiff, or C.O., court reporter, etc....

The lawyer is supposed to use the law (and evidence), not his morals, to do his job.

But I didn't say that there should be lawyers, B. My point is that lawyers should have a moral compass and follow that moral compass, regardless of the payday, career advancement, etc.

I know it's not like that and will never be like that, so this ain't not fairy tell shit, but that's how it SHOULD be. That's all. *shrugs*

 

[SneakDZA]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

There is absolutely nothing vague about this...

Richards was initially indicted on two counts of second-degree child rape, felonies that translate to a 10-year mandatory jail sentence per count. He was released on $60,000 bail while awaiting his charges.

As mryounggun pointed out... it's past tense.

 

[7figz]

@SneakDZA‌ - so what do you understand from that quote ?

Was he convicted or not ?

 

[cainvelasquez]

Murica, baby! Ya'll idiots keep waving that good old stars and stripes. But me, i'm good in Europe.

 

[Dupac]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

you ever see the movie devil's advocate?

sometimes you gotta just say no

 

[Melqart]

well.. i guess this is what happens when you're the descendant of an industrial "illuminati" family. sad.

 

[7figz]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

you ever see the movie devil's advocate?

sometimes you gotta just say no

I hate to argue this point in a thread as despicable as this (based on those charges), but I think blaming lawyers is displaced.

Judges stay fucked up and fucked up laws keep getting made, BUT we don't blame those people - instead we point fingers at lawyers for taking a case ?

Just seems like people falling for the smokescreen.

 

[mryounggun]

Wow, this shit is sick.

But why does the article say "convicted" then says he is "awaiting charges" ?

Who's to say these aren't accusations just to build up the divorce case ?

The 'awaiting charges' is in reference to past tense shit. He was INITIALLY charged with XYZ and was released on bail while awaiting different charges. At this point, he got those charges and has been found guilty. Is the way I read it anyway.

You might be right but that shit is vague at best.

lawyers can really be the devil sometimes....

this another reason why people don't respect the system

I don't really understand why people fault lawyers. They don't make the decisions, they're job is to put up the best case for their client.

you ever see the movie devil's advocate?

sometimes you gotta just say no

I hate to argue this point in a thread as despicable as this (based on those charges), but I think blaming lawyers is displaced.

Judges stay fucked up and fucked up laws keep getting made, BUT we don't blame those people - instead we point fingers at lawyers for taking a case ?

Just seems like people falling for the smokescreen.

No one said that judges are not to blame. They are MORE to blame. But that doesn't absolve lawyers.

 

[5th Letter]

They play by a different set of rules than everybody else.